Hebrew root (lemma) ‘חֲרַךְ’ (ḩₐrak)

← חֲרַךְ ↑ →

Have 1 use of Hebrew root (lemma) ‘חֲרַךְ’ (ḩₐrak) in the Hebrew originals

DAN 3:27 הִתְחָרַךְ (hitḩārak) VMp3ms contextual word gloss=‘it_was_singed’ word gloss=‘singed’ OSHB DAN 3:27 word 18

OET-LV: 27 the_satraps And_were_gathered the_prefects and_the_governors and_the _counsellors _of Oh/the_king they_were_seeing DOM_the_men these that not it _had _had _power the_fire over_their _of_body and_the _hair _of their _head not it _was _singed and_their _of_mantles not they _were _changed and_the_smell _of fire not it _had _touched on_them. (DAN_3:27)

OET-RV: 27 All the king’s officials gathered around them and saw that the fire hadn’t harmed them—their hair wasn’t even singed, their cloaks weren’t damaged, and they didn’t even smell like smoke. (DAN 3:27)

Lemmas with same root consonants as ‘חרך’ (ḩrk)

It's possible that this might not have any actual semantic connection to the main root above—use with caution.

Have 1 use of Hebrew root (lemma) ‘חָרַךְ’ (ḩārak) in the Hebrew originals

PROV 12:27 יַחֲרֹךְ (yaḩₐrok) Vqi3ms contextual word gloss=‘he_roasts’ word gloss=‘roast’ OSHB PROV 12:27 word 2

OET-LV: 27 Not slackness he _roasts game _of_his _hunted and_the_wealth a _person precious a _diligent_person. (PRO_12:27)

OET-RV: 27 A slack hunter doesn’t roast his kill,
⇔ ^ but a diligent person values all their possessions. (PRO 12:27)