Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key  Downloads

OET OET-RV OET-LV GHT ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Parallel Simple Interlinear Topics Reference Dictionary Search

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W XY Z

Tyndale Open Bible Dictionary

Intro ← Index → ©

RUTH, Book of

Preview

• Author and Date

• Purpose

• Content

• Message

Author and Date

The author of the book is unknown. The question of authorship has particular connection with the date of writing, and a few clues provide at least an educated guess. The book must have been written sometime after the beginning of David’s reign. The information in Ruth 4:18-22, which pertains to the historical significance of Ruth as David’s great-grandmother, bears this out. Since foreign marriages were not approved in the book of Ruth, it scarcely could have been written during the period in which Solomon began his policy of foreign marriages. Also, David’s close friendship with Moab might have prompted someone in his kingdom to write the book, thus presenting objective rationale for David’s actions (see 1 Sm 22:3-5). Consequently, the author may have been someone close to David, possibly Samuel, Nathan, or Abiathar.

Show passage in OET: RUT 4:18–22

OET-RV RUT 4:18

18 Here is a list of the descendants of Perets: Perets’s son was Hetsron.

OET-RV RUT 4:19

19 Hetsron’s son was Ram and Ram’s son was Aminadav.

OET-RV RUT 4:20

20 Aminadav’s son was Nahshon and Nahshon’s son was Salmon.

OET-RV RUT 4:21

21 Salmon’s son was Boaz and Boaz’s son was Oved.

OET-RV RUT 4:22

22 Oved’s son was Yishay and Yishay’s son was King David.

OET-LV RUT 4:18

18 And_these are_the_descendants_of Pereʦ Pereʦ he_fathered DOM Ḩeʦrōn.

OET-LV RUT 4:19

19 And_Ḩeʦrōn he_fathered DOM Rām and_Rām he_fathered DOM ˊAmminādāⱱ.

OET-LV RUT 4:20

20 And_ˊAmminādāⱱ he_fathered DOM Naḩshōn and_Naḩshōn he_fathered DOM Salmah.

OET-LV RUT 4:21

21 And_Salmōn he_fathered DOM Boˊaz and_Boˊaz he_fathered DOM ˊŌⱱēd.

OET-LV RUT 4:22

22 And_ˊŌⱱēd he_fathered DOM Yishay and_Yishay he_fathered DOM Dāvid.
Show passage in OET: SA1 22:3–5

OET-RV SA1 22:3

3 From there, David went to Mitspah in Moav (Moab), and he asked the king of Moav, “Please let my parents stay here in the palace with you until I find out what God will do for me.”

OET-RV SA1 22:4

4 So he took them to the king where they stayed with him the entire time that David lived in the fortress.

OET-RV SA1 22:5

5 Then the prophet Gad told David, “Don’t stay in the fortress. Leave it and come back to Yehudah’s (Judah’s) region.” So David left and went to the Heret forest in Yehudah.

OET-LV SA1 22:3

3 And_ Dāvid _he/it_went from_there Miʦpāh of_Mōʼāⱱ and_he/it_said to the_king_of Mōʼāⱱ let_him_go_out please father_of_my and_mother_of_my with_you(pl) until that I_will_know what will_he_do to/for_me god.

OET-LV SA1 22:4

4 And_he_led_them with the_presence_of the_king_of Mōʼāⱱ and_they_lived with_him/it all_of the_days_of the_being of_Dāvid in_stronghold.

OET-LV SA1 22:5

5 And_ Gād the_prophet _he/it_said to Dāvid not you_must_remain in_stronghold go and_you_will_go (for)_yourself the_land_of Yəhūdāh/(Judah) and_ Dāvid _he/it_went and_he_came the_forest_of Ḩeret.

Jump to OET RUT 4:18–22 section.

Jump to OET SA1 22:3–5 section.

The time of the narrative is indicated by the opening statement: “In the days when the judges ruled. . . .” The dates of the judges probably comprise a period of about 300 years, beginning with the judgeship of Othniel and concluding with that of Samson, though Samuel also served as a judge. If the genealogical information is complete in Ruth 4:18-22, the events took place during the life of David’s great-grandfather and mark the birth of his grandfather. Allowing a 35-year generation span, the events would have taken place somewhere about the turn of the 11th century BC, or about 100 years before David’s birth.

Purpose

The book’s purpose is closely related to its date of composition. Assuming an early date, that is, one close to David’s lifetime, its principal thrust must be the authentication of the Davidic line. The book may be considered as a justification for including the godly Moabitess in the nation of Israel.

Content

Introduction (1:1-5)

Show passage in OET: RUT 1:1–5

OET-RV RUT 1:1

1 Back in the time when the tribal leaders ruled Yisrael (Israel), there was a drought which caused a shortage of food, so a man from the town of Beyt-Lehem (Bethlehem) in the Yehudah (Judah) region went to live in the country of Moav (Moab) for a while, taking his wife and their two sons.

OET-RV RUT 1:2

2 The man’s name was Elimelek and he was married to No’omi (Naomi), and their sons’ names were Mahlon and Kilyon. (They were part of the Efratah clan from Beyt-Lehem in Yehudah.) They travelled to the Moav countryside and lived there.

OET-RV RUT 1:3

3 Then No’omi’s husband Elimelek died, and she was left with her two sons.

OET-RV RUT 1:4

4 Eventually they married women from there in Moav—Orpah and Ruth. But after No’omi and her sons had lived in Moav for about then years,

OET-RV RUT 1:5

5 Mahlon and Kilyon both also died, and No’omi was left without her husband or her two sons.

OET-LV RUT 1:1

1 And_he/it_was in_the_days_of the_judges of_the_judging and_he/it_was a_famine on_the_earth and_he/it_went a_man from_Bēyt- food/grain/bread Yəhūdāh/(Judah) to_sojourn in_the_region(s)_of Mōʼāⱱ he and_his/its_woman/wife and_the_two_of sons_of_his.

OET-LV RUT 1:2

2 And_name_of the_man was_ʼElīmelek and_name_of his/its_wife/woman was_Noˊₒmī and_name_of the_two_of sons_of_his was_Maḩlōn and_Kilion ʼEfrātī from_Bēyt- food/grain/bread Yəhūdāh and_they_came the_region(s)_of Mōʼāⱱ and_they_were there.

OET-LV RUT 1:3

3 And_ ʼElīmelek the_husband_of Noˊₒmī _he/it_died and_ she and_the_two_of sons_of_her _she_was_left.

OET-LV RUT 1:4

4 And_they_took to/for_them wives Mōʼāⱱites the_name_of the_one(f) was_Orpah and_name_of the_second(fs) was_Rūt and_they_lived there about_ten years.

OET-LV RUT 1:5

5 And_ also both_of_them Maḩlōn and_Kilion _they_died and_ the_woman _she_was_left from_both_of children_of_her and_from_husband_of_her.

Jump to OET RUT 1:1–5 section.

Driven by famine, Elimelech, with his wife, Naomi, and his two sons, Mahlon and Chilion, cross the Jordan to stay for a period of time in Moab, where there is sufficient provision. The two sons, after marrying Moabite women, die, and their father dies as well. Naomi is left a widow, with two foreign daughters-in-law.

The Story of Ruth

Elimelech, Naomi, and their two sons went to the land of Moab. Naomi returned to Bethlehem after her husband and sons died.

Return to Bethlehem (1:6-22)

Hearing reports from Bethlehem that the famine has ended, Naomi makes preparations to return. Both of her daughters-in-law, Orpah and Ruth, accompany her for at least a portion of the journey. Probably thinking of the problems they might encounter as foreigners in Judah, Naomi strongly urges the girls to stay in their own land. Both of the young widows refuse, but Naomi presents the facts. First, she is not pregnant, so the chance of a younger brother fulfilling the levirate responsibility is not imminent. Second, she has no prospects of remarriage and consequently no prospect of further children. Then she also notes that even if the first two conditions were met immediately, the possibility of their waiting was impossible. Orpah is persuaded and kisses her mother-in-law good-bye.

But Ruth “clung to her” (1:18). The verb, having the connotation of being glued to something, is the same verb used of marriage (Gn 2:24). Ruth demonstrated her serious intentions by making five commitments (Ru 1:16-17). In essence, Ruth renounced her former life in order to gain a life that she considered of greater value. She decided to follow the God of Israel and his laws. Ruth’s appeal to the God of Israel was more than equal to Naomi’s pleas, and the two of them returned together.

Show passage in OET: RUT 1:18

OET-RV RUT 1:18

18 When No’omi saw that Ruth was determined to go with her, she didn’t say any more.

OET-LV RUT 1:18

18 And_she/it_saw if/because_that she was_determined to_go with_her and_she_ceased to_speak to_her.
Show passage in OET: GEN 2:24

OET-RV GEN 2:24

24 So that’s why a man leaves his father and mother, and becomes united to his wife, and the two of them become one being.

OET-LV GEN 2:24

24 Therefore yes/correct/thus/so a_man he_leaves DOM his/its_father and_DOM his/its_mother and_he/it_clings in/on_his/its_woman/wife and_they_will_be to/for_flesh/body one.
Show passage in OET: RUT 1:16–17

OET-RV RUT 1:16

16 But Ruth replied, “Please don’t insist that I leave you and go back, because wherever you go, I’ll go with you and wherever you live, I’ll live there too. Your people are my people, and your god is my god.

OET-RV RUT 1:17

17 Wherever you die, I’ll die there too and be buried there. May Yahweh punish me severely if anything other than death separates the two of us.”

OET-LV RUT 1:16

16 And_ Rūt _she/it_said do_not entreat (on)_me to_abandon_you to_turn_back from_after_you if/because to where you_will_go I_will_go and_at_where you_will_lodge I_will_lodge people_of_your people_of_my and_god_of_your god_of_my.

OET-LV RUT 1:17

17 At_where you_will_die I_will_die and_there I_will_be_buried thus YHWH may_he_do to_me and_thus may_he_add if/because (the)_death it_will_separate between_me and_between_you.

Jump to OET RUT 1:18 section.

Jump to OET GEN 2:24 section.

Jump to OET RUT 1:16–17 section.

Their arrival in Bethlehem was traumatic for Naomi. Having left Bethlehem with a husband and two sons, she returned empty. She told her friends to call her “Mara” (bitter). But she had returned at a propitious time, the beginning of the harvest season.

Reaping in the Fields of Boaz (2:1-23)

The first verse of the chapter provides the setting for the narrative that follows by introducing Boaz, a wealthy relative of Elimelech.

In the second verse, Ruth volunteered to glean the fields by following the reapers and picking up the small amounts left behind. Gleaners were also permitted to harvest the grain in the corners of the fields—a provision for the poor contained in the law (Lv 19:9-10).

Show passage in OET: LEV 19:9–10

OET-RV LEV 19:9

9 When you all harvest your crops off your land, you mustn’t cut the grain right to the very edge of your field, and nor can you all pick up any dropped stalks.

OET-RV LEV 19:10

10 In your vineyards, you must not pick every last grape or pick up any that fall on the ground, because they must be left for the poor and for the foreigners. I am your god Yahweh.

OET-LV LEV 19:9

9 And_when_harvest_you(pl) DOM the_harvest_of your_land_of_your(pl) not you_will_finish the_side_of your_field_of_your to_harvest and_the_remnant_of your_harvest_of_your not you_will_gather.

OET-LV LEV 19:10

10 And_vineyard_of_your not you_will_glean and_the_fallen_grape[s]_of your_vineyard_of_your not you_will_gather for_person and_for_sojourner you_will_leave DOM_them I am_YHWH god_of_your(pl).

Jump to OET LEV 19:9–10 section.

Ruth happened to come to the field of Boaz. When he visited this field, he noticed Ruth, inquired about her, and learned her identity. His overseer reported that she had industriously worked the fields from early morning until that time. Boaz, attracted to her because of her loyalty and concern for Naomi, graciously made additional provisions for her. She was given a favored position in reaping, directly behind the main body of reapers. Further, she was to receive water that had been drawn for her by the young men—an unorthodox arrangement.

Ruth, falling before Boaz in a gesture of great humility and respect, asked why she—as a foreigner—should receive such favor. Boaz gave two reasons: her kindness to her mother-in-law, and her spiritual insight, which led her to seek after Israel’s God, “under whose wings you have come to take refuge” (Ru 2:12, NLT).

Show passage in OET: RUT 2:12

OET-RV RUT 2:12

12 May Yahweh reward your hard work. Since you’ve come here for protection under Yisrael’s (Israel’s) god Yahweh, may he reward you in full.”

OET-LV RUT 2:12

12 YHWH may_he_reward deed[s]_of_your and_may_it_be wage[s]_of_your complete from_with YHWH the_god_of Yisrāʼēl/(Israel) whom you_have_come to_take_refuge under wings_of_his.

Jump to OET RUT 2:12 section.

She was also given a place at the reapers’ table and, upon Boaz’s orders, returned to the fields, this time to reap from the unharvested grain. At the end of the day she returned home to Naomi and told her of the day’s events. Naomi informed Ruth that Boaz had the right of redemption (see discussion below). Ruth returned to his fields until the end of the harvest season.

Relying upon the Kinsman (3:1-18)

Naomi advised Ruth to approach Boaz as a go’el, or kinsman-redeemer. The plan suggested by Naomi seems peculiar, yet some thoughts may give a certain coloring to it. (1) Naomi seems to have believed that Boaz was the nearest kinsman, being ignorant of the yet nearer one (3:12). Consequently, according to Israelite law (Dt 25:5ff.), it would be the duty of Boaz to marry Ruth to produce offspring, since her husband died. (2) The general presentation of Naomi’s character in this book is that of a God-fearing woman. It is certain that, however curious in its external form, there can be nothing counseled here that is repugnant to God’s law or shocking to a virtuous man such as Boaz. Otherwise, Naomi would have been frustrating her own purpose.

Show passage in OET: RUT 3:12

OET-RV RUT 3:12

12 It is true that I have a responsibility towards your family, but there’s another man who’s more closely related to you all than me.

OET-LV RUT 3:12

12 And_now if/because truly if/because wwww am_a_kinsman-redeemer I and_also there_is a_kinsman-redeemer near more_than_I.

Jump to OET RUT 3:12 section.

Boaz’s response to Ruth’s actions demonstrated his gentlemanly concerns for her. He explained to her that he was not the nearest kinsman but promised that he would take care of the necessary procedures the next day. Protecting her reputation, Boaz sent her home before daylight. Naomi predicted that Boaz would settle the matter that very day.

Redeeming the Inheritance (4:1-22)

Boaz went to the place of business, the city gate. The city gate area comprised the forum where the public affairs of the city were discussed. Boaz indicated that he wished to discuss a matter of business with the nearer kinsman. Ten of the city elders acted as witnesses. The first matter at hand was to deal with the issue of property. Boaz asked this nearer kinsman if he was willing to acquire property for Naomi. This is stated in the traditional stipulation: “Your purchase of the land from Naomi also requires that you marry Ruth, the Moabite widow” (4:5, NLT). The nearer kinsman was unwilling to marry Ruth because this would inevitably cost him some financial loss, since he would have to divide his own property with any son of his born to Ruth. Thus he relinquished his rights by the custom of taking off his shoe. (The shoe was symbolic of the land rights that belonged to the inheritance.) So Boaz took the part of being the kinsman-redeemer. The marriage of Boaz and Ruth produced a son who, under Israel’s laws, was reckoned as Naomi’s child and heir.

Show passage in OET: RUT 4:5

OET-RV RUT 4:5

5 “When you buy the land from No’omi,” Boaz continued, “you will also need to marry Ruth, our deceased relative’s widow from Moav, so that she’ll have a son who will inherit the property and continue Elimelek’s family line.”

OET-LV RUT 4:5

5 And_ Boˊaz _he/it_said in/on_day acquire_you the_field from_the_hand_of Noˊₒmī and_from_with Rūt the_Mōʼāⱱite_woman the_wife_of the_dead_man you_have_acquired to_raise_up the_name_of the_dead_man over inheritance_of_his.

Jump to OET RUT 4:5 section.

Message

First, the book of Ruth traces the lineage of Ruth to David. The completion of that line is in Matthew 1 and finds its fulfillment in Jesus.

A second teaching is the beauty of God’s grace. A foreigner, even a Moabitess, can be linked with Israel’s blessing.

Theologically, the concept of kinsman-redeemer as a type of Messiah is clearly evident. He must be a blood relative, have the ability to purchase, be willing to buy the inheritance, and be willing to marry the widow of the deceased kinsman.

And finally, the love that Ruth showed to Naomi provides a pattern of devotion. The women of Bethlehem told Naomi, “Your daughter-in-law . . . loves you so much and [is] better to you than seven sons!” (4:15, NLT).

Show passage in OET: RUT 4:15

OET-RV RUT 4:15

15 ⇔Your daughter-in-law, who loves you and who’s been better to you than if you had seven sons, has given birth to him. Now he’ll make you feel young again and he’ll take care of you when you get old.”

OET-LV RUT 4:15

15 And_it_was to/for_you(fs) (into)_one_who_restores life and_to_sustain DOM age_of_your_old if/because daughter-in-law_of_your who she_loves_you she_has_given_birth_to_him who she is_good to/for_you(fs) more_than_seven sons.

Jump to OET RUT 4:15 section.