Open English Translation (OET)

Hebrew wordlink #229503

OSHB Est 3:1 הַמְּדָתָא (hammədātāʼ) Strongs=4099 Lemma=‘הַמְּדָתָא’
contextual word gloss=‘of_Hammedatha’ word gloss=‘Hammedatha’
Morphology=Np PoS=proper_noun
Person=Hammedatha Year=-453

Note: These word pages enable you to click through to the Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (OSHB) that the Open English Translation Old Testament is translated from. The OSHB is based on the Westminster Leningrad Codex (WLC). (We are still searching for a digitized facsimile of the Leningradensis manuscript that we can easily link to. See this list and this archive for now.) This is all part of the commitment of the Open English Translation team to be transparent about all levels of the Bible translation process right back to the original manuscripts.

Other uses (4) of identical word form הַמְּדָתָא (Morphology=Np PoS=proper_noun) in the Hebrew originals

The word form ‘הַמְּדָתָא’ (Morphology=Np PoS=proper_noun) is always and only glossed as ‘of_Hammedatha’.

EST 3:10 contextual word gloss=‘of_Hammedatha’ word gloss=‘Hammedatha’ OSHB EST 3:10 word 10

OET-LV: 10 And_he _removed the_king DOM signet-ring _of_his from_under his/its_hand and_he_gave _it to_Haman the _son _of Hammedatha the_Agagite the _harasser _of the _Yəhūdī. (EST_3:10)

OET-RV: 10 This seemed sensible to the king so he removed his signet ring from his finger and he gave it to Haman (the son of Hammedatha, the Agagite, the adversary of the Jews). (EST 3:10)

EST 8:5 contextual word gloss=‘of_Hammedatha’ word gloss=‘Hammedatha’ OSHB EST 8:5 word 24

OET-LV: 5 And_she/it _said if is_on the_king good and_if I _have _found favour before_him and_it _is _proper the_matter to_(the)_face _of/in _front _of/before the_king and_am_good I in_his _of_eyes let _it _be _written to_revoke DOM the_letters the _plan _of Haman the _son _of Hammedatha the_Agagite which he _wrote to_destroy DOM the_Yəhūdī/(Jews) who in_all the _provinces _of the _king. (EST_8:5)

OET-RV: 5 “Your majesty,” she said, “if you think that it’s the right thing to do, and if you’re pleased with me, please write a new letter revoking the letters that Haman (the son of Hammedatha, the Agagite) sent out instructing the people to destroy all the Jews throughout your empire. (EST 8:5)

EST 9:10 contextual word gloss=‘of_Hammedatha’ word gloss=‘Hammedatha’ OSHB EST 9:10 word 5

OET-LV: 10 The _ten _of the _sons _of Haman the _son _of Hammedatha the _harasser _of the _Yəhūdī they _killed and_on_plunder not they _stretched _out DOM hand _of_their. (EST_9:10)

OET-RV: 10 Those were the ten sons of Haman (son of Hammedatha), the enemy of the Jews, but the Jews didn’t take their possessions. (EST 9:10)

EST 9:24 contextual word gloss=‘of_Hammedatha’ word gloss=‘Hammedatha’ OSHB EST 9:24 word 4

OET-LV: 24 If/because Haman the _son _of Hammedatha the_Agagite the _harasser _of all _of the_Yəhūdī/(Jews) he _had _planned on the_Yəhūdī to_destroy_them and_he _had _throw Pur that is_the_lot to_disturb_them and_to_destroy_them. (EST_9:24)

OET-RV: 24 Yes, Haman (the son of Hammedatha, the Agagite), the enemy of all the Jews, had plotted to annihilate them, and he had thrown a ‘Pur’ (which is ‘lot’ or perhaps ‘dice’) choose the date to crush them and to destroy them. (EST 9:24)