Strongs G203

← G203 ↑ →

ἀκροβυστία (akrobystía) from G206 and probably a modified form of (the penis or male sexual organ); the prepuce; by implication, an uncircumcised (i.e. gentile, figuratively, unregenerate) state or person:--not circumcised, uncircumcised (with G2192), uncircumcision.

Appears in a total of 17 verses:

ROM 2:27

OET-LV: 27 And will _be _judging the by nature uncircumcision, the law finishing, you who through the_letter and circumcision are a_transgressor of _law. (ROM_2:27)

OET-RV: 27 Yes, those peoples who are not circumcised but keep the law, will be judging you who were given the law in writing and are circumcised, yet break those laws. (ROM 2:27)

ACT 11:3

OET-LV: 3 saying, that He _came _in to men, having uncircumcision, and ate _with with _them. (ACT_11:3)

OET-RV: 3 saying that he had gone into the home of uncircumcised pagans and even eaten with them. (ACT 11:3)

ROM 4:12

OET-LV: 12 and father of _circumcision to _the ones not of circumcision only, but also to _the ones aligning in _the steps which in uncircumcision of _faith, of _the father of _us Abraʼam/(ʼAⱱrāhām). (ROM_4:12)

OET-RV: 12 So our ancestor Abraham is the ancestor of us as a circumcised people, not just because we’re circumcised, but also as we follow his steps of faith while uncircumcised. (ROM 4:12)

GAL 2:7

OET-LV: 7 But instead having _seen that I _have _been _entrusted the good _message of _the uncircumcision, as Petros of _the circumcision (GAL_2:7)

OET-RV: 7 Instead, they saw that I’ve been entrusted with taking the good message to the non-Jews, just like Peter was entrusted to take it to the Jews, (GAL 2:7)

EPH 2:11

OET-LV: 11 Therefore be _remembering that once you _all the pagans in the_flesh, the ones being _called the_uncircumcision by the being _called circumcision in the_flesh handmade, (EPH_2:11)

OET-RV: 11 Because of that, don’t forget that you all were once fleshly unbelievers (nicknamed ‘the uncircumcised ones’ by circumcised Jews who mark the bodies of their males with human hands). (EPH 2:11)

COL 2:13

OET-LV: 13 And you _all being dead in the transgressions and in _the uncircumcision of _the flesh of _you _all, he _made_ us _alive _together with him, having _forgiven all our transgressions to _us, (COL_2:13)

OET-RV: 13 You all were dead in your disobedience and because your bodies were ‘uncircumcised’. Then he made us alive together with him after he forgave us for all our disobedience. (COL 2:13)

ROM 3:30

OET-LV: 30 if _indeed one the god is, who will _be _justifying the_circumcision by faith, and the_uncircumcision through the faith. (ROM_3:30)

OET-RV: 30 Indeed, there’s only one God and he declares people guiltless by faith whether they’re circumcised Jews, or non-Jews. (ROM 3:30)

ROM 4:9

OET-LV: 9 The therefore is blessing this on the circumcision, or also on the uncircumcision? For/Because we _are _saying: ˓Was˒_counted to_ the _Abraʼam the faith for righteousness. (ROM_4:9)

OET-RV: 9 Is this favour shown to circumcised Jews or is it also for non-Jews? Because we were saying that Abraham was considered guiltless because of his faith. (ROM 4:9)

COL 3:11

OET-LV: 11 where there _is not Hellaʸn and Youdaios, circumcision and uncircumcision, foreigner, Skuthaʸs, slave, free, but chosen _one /messiah is all things and in all things. (COL_3:11)

OET-RV: 11 where there’s no distinctions between ethnicities or religion, locals and foreigners, slaves or free, but Messiah is everything and in all of us. (COL 3:11)

CO1 7:19

OET-LV: 19 The circumcision nothing is, and the uncircumcision nothing is, but keeping of_the_commands of_god. (CO1_7:19)

OET-RV: 19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing, but obeying God’s commands is what counts. (CO1 7:19)

CO1 7:18

OET-LV: 18 Having _been _circumcised anyone was _called? Not him _let _be _uncircumcised. In uncircumcision has _been _called anyone? Not him _let _be _being _circumcised. (CO1_7:18)

OET-RV: 18 Anyone who was called and who was previously circumcised, shouldn’t become ‘uncircumcised’. Anyone who was called who was uncircumcised, shouldn’t get circumcised. (CO1 7:18)

ROM 2:26

OET-LV: 26 Therefore if the uncircumcision, the just _acts of _the law may _be _keeping, not the uncircumcision of _him for circumcision will _be _being _counted? (ROM_2:26)

OET-RV: 26 so if uncircumcised peoples act justly according to the law, even though they’re not physically circumcised, God will consider them as his people. (ROM 2:26)

ROM 2:25

OET-LV: 25 Circumcision for on _one _hand is _benefiting, if the_law you _may _be _practicing, on _the _other _hand if a_transgressor of _law you _may _be _may _be, the circumcision of _you, uncircumcision has _become. (ROM_2:25)

OET-RV: 25 Circumcision is of value if you’re keeping the law, but if you’re breaking the laws, then your circumcision is just the same as if you’re uncircumcised, (ROM 2:25)

GAL 5:6

OET-LV: 6 For/Because in chosen _one /messiah Yaʸsous/(Yəhōshūˊa), neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is _prevailing anything, but faith working through love. (GAL_5:6)

OET-RV: 6 because in the messiah Yeshua, it’s not circumcision that achieves anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith worked out through love. (GAL 5:6)

ROM 4:11

OET-LV: 11 and the_sign he _received of _circumcision, a_seal of _the righteousness of _the faith which in the uncircumcision, in _order that to _be him father of _all the ones believing through uncircumcision, in _order that to _be _counted to _them the righteousness, (ROM_4:11)

OET-RV: 11 He received circumcision as a sign—proof of the righteousness that he gained from his faith while he was still uncircumcised—becoming the father of everyone who’s uncircumcised but believes so that they’ll be declared guiltless. (ROM 4:11)

GAL 6:15

OET-LV: 15 For/Because neither circumcision is anything, nor uncircumcision, but new creation. (GAL_6:15)

OET-RV: 15 because obeying Mosheh’s law is nothing, and not needing to obey it is nothing, but being a new creation is everything. (GAL 6:15)

ROM 4:10

OET-LV: 10 Therefore how it _was _counted? In circumcision being, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision, (ROM_4:10)

OET-RV: 10 So how did that happen? Because he was circumcised or when he was still uncircumcised? No, it was before he was circumcised. (ROM 4:10)

View on BibleHub.