OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Parallel Interlinear Simple Topics Reference Dictionary Search
VerseList GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT ESA WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
Job Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42
Job 22 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V30
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Text critical issues=small word differences Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Elifaz (All still tentative.)
OET (OET-RV) If he didn’t destroy our enemies, MEANING? ⇔ and fire has destroyed what was left. MEANING?![]()
OET-LV If not he_has_been_destroyed adversary_of_our and_abundance_of_their it_has_consumed fire.![]()
ULT ‘If our enemy is not cut off? ⇔ And fire has devoured their possessions!’
UST Those good people say, ‘Now God has destroyed our enemies! ⇔ It is as if a fire has burned up everything they owned.’
BSB & MSB ‘Surely our foes are destroyed, ⇔ and fire has consumed their excess.’
OEB No OEB JOB book available
WEBBE & WMBB saying, ‘Surely those who rose up against us are cut off. ⇔ The fire has consumed their remnant.’
NET ‘Surely our enemies are destroyed, ⇔ and fire consumes their wealth.’
LSV Surely our substance has not been cut off,
And fire has consumed their excellence.
FBV saying, ‘Our enemies are destroyed, and fire has burned up all that's left of them.’
T4T They say, ‘Now our enemies have been destroyed, ⇔ and all their possessions that were left have been burned in a fire.’
LEB •
Surely[fn] our foe perishes,
•
and fire has consumed their remainder.[fn]
BBE Saying, Truly, their substance is cut off, and their wealth is food for the fire.
Moff shouting, ‘Our* foes are now effaced, ⇔ and what they leave the flames will bum!’
JPS 'Surely their substance is cut off, and their abundance the fire hath consumed.'
ASV Saying, Surely they that did rise up against us are cut off, ⇔ And the remnant of them the fire hath consumed.
DRA Is not their exaltation cut down, and hath not fire devoured the remnants of them?
YLT 'Surely our substance hath not been cut off, And their excellency hath fire consumed.'
Drby Is not he who rose against us destroyed, and doth not the fire consume his residue?
RV Saying, Surely they that did rise up against us are cut off, and the remnant of them the fire hath consumed.
(Saying, Surely they that did rise up against us are cut off, and the remnant of them the fire hath/has consumed.)
SLT If our adversaries were not destroyed, and their remnant the fire shall devour.
Wbstr Whereas our substance is not cut down, but the remnant of them the fire consumeth.
KJB-1769 Whereas our substance is not cut down, but the remnant of them the fire consumeth.[fn][fn]
KJB-1611 Whereas our [fn]substance is not cut downe, but the [fn]remnant of them the fire consumeth.
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above apart from footnotes)
Bshps Is our substaunce bewen downe? As for the remnaunt of them the fire hath consumed.
(Is our substance bewen down? As for the remnant of them the fire hath/has consumed.)
Gnva Surely our substance is hid: but the fire hath deuoured the remnant of them.
(Surely our substance is hid: but the fire hath/has devoured the remnant of them.)
Cvdl that their increase shal be hewen downe, & their posterite consumed with the fyre.
(that their increase shall be hewn/chopped down, and their posterity consumed with the fire.)
Wycl Whether the reisyng of hem is not kit doun, and fier schal deuoure the relifs of hem?
(Whether the raising of hem is not cut down, and fire shall devour the remains/fragments of hem?)
Luth Was gilt‘s, ihr Wesen wird verschwinden und ihr Übriges das Feuer verzehren!
(What does_it_apply, you(pl)/their/her beings becomes disappear/vanish and you(pl)/their/her Übriges the fire(n) consume!)
ClVg nonne succisa est erectio eorum? et reliquias eorum devoravit ignis?[fn]
(isn’t_it succisa it_is erectio their? and remains their he_devoured fire?)
UHB אִם־לֹ֣א נִכְחַ֣ד קִימָ֑נוּ וְ֝יִתְרָ֗ם אָ֣כְלָה אֵֽשׁ׃ ‡
BrLXX Εἰ μὴ ἠφανίσθη ἡ ὑπόστασις αὐτῶν, καὶ τὸ κατάλειμμα αὐτῶν καταφάγεται πῦρ.
BrTr Verily their substance has been utterly destroyed, and the fire shall devour what is left of their property.