Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key

OETOET-RVOET-LVULTUSTBSBMSBBLBAICNTOEBWEBBEWMBBNETLSVFBVTCNTT4TLEBBBEMoffJPSWymthASVDRAYLTDrbyRVSLTWbstrKJB-1769KJB-1611BshpsGnvaCvdlTNTWyclSR-GNTUHBBrLXXBrTrRelatedParallelInterlinear Simple TopicsReferenceDictionarySearch

VerseList GENEXOLEVNUMDEUJOBJOSJDGRUTH1 SAM2 SAMPSAAMOSHOS1 KI2 KI1 CHR2 CHRPROVECCSNGJOELMICISAZEPHABJERLAMYNA (JNA)NAHOBADANEZEEZRAESTNEHHAGZECMALLAOGESLESESGDNG2 PSTOBJDTESAWISSIRBARLJEPAZSUSBELMAN1 MAC2 MAC3 MAC4 MACYHN (JHN)MARKMATLUKEACTsYAC (JAM)GAL1 TH2 TH1 COR2 CORROMCOLPHMEPHPHP1 TIMTIT1 PET2 PET2 TIMHEBYUD (JUD)1 YHN (1 JHN)2 YHN (2 JHN)3 YHN (3 JHN)REV

Jos IntroC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C23C24

Jos 22 V1V2V3V4V5V6V7V8V9V10V11V12V13V14V15V16V17V18V19V21V22V23V24V25V26V27V28V29V30V31V32V33V34

Verse List for JOS 22:20

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

BI Jos 22:20 ©

Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Narrator (All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV) Didn’t Akan act unfaithfully taking something that was forbidden and all of us suffered as a result of it? It wasn’t just him alone that died because of that.’ ”OET logo mark

OET-LVAm_not ˊĀkān the_son_of Zeraḩ did_he_act_unfaithfully unfaithfulness in_thing[s] and_towards all_of the_congregation_of Yisrāʼēl/(Israel) anger it_was and_he was_a_man one not did_he_die for_iniquity_of_his.OET logo mark

ULTDid not Achan, the son of Zerah, act unfaithfully in unfaithfulness with the devoted thing, and wrath was on all of the congregation of Israel? And he did not perish, one man, in his iniquity!’ ”

USTRecall how Achan son of Zerah was so disloyal to Yahweh and kept some things from Jericho even though we were supposed to destroy everything there. This made Yahweh angry with all of us Israelites. Because of what that one man did wrong, many other Israelites died.”

BSB & MSBWas not Achan[fn] son of Zerah unfaithful regarding what was set apart for destruction,[fn] bringing wrath upon the whole congregation of Israel? Yet it was not only [Achan] who perished because of his sin!’ ”

OEBWasn’t Achan the son of Zerah guilty of a breach of faith in the matter of the spoil which was dedicated to God, until God”s anger fell upon the whole community? He was not the only one to die for his crime.’

WEBBE & WMBBDidn’t Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the devoted thing, and wrath fell on all the congregation of Israel? That man didn’t perish alone in his iniquity.’ ”

NETWhen Achan son of Zerah disobeyed the command about the city’s riches, the entire Israelite community was judged, though only one man had sinned. He most certainly died for his sin!’ ”

LSVDid Achan son of Zerah not commit a trespass in the devoted thing, and there was wrath on all the congregation of Israel? And he alone did not expire in his iniquity.”

FBVWhen Achan, son of Zerah, acted disloyally in taking consecrated things,[fn] didn't the whole of Israel suffer punishment? He wasn't the only one who died because of his sin!’ ”

T4TDo you remember what happened when Zerah’s son Achan refused to obey Yahweh’s command to destroy everything in Jericho? That one man disobeyed God’s command, but many [HYP] other Israelis were punished. Achan died because of his sin, but other Israelis also died.”

LEBDid not Achan son of Zerah commit treachery with devoted things,[fn] and wrath fell on all the congregation of Israel? And he alone[fn] did not perish because of his iniquity.’ ”

BBEDid not Achan, the son of Zerah, do wrong about the cursed thing, causing wrath to come on all the people of Israel? And not on him only came the punishment of death.

MoffWas not Achan the son of Zerah guilty of a breach of faith in the matter of doomed spoil, till God’s anger fell upon the whole community ? He did not perish alone in his iniquity.”

JPSDid not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass concerning the devoted thing, and wrath fell upon all the congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquity.'

ASVDid not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the devoted thing, and wrath fell upon all the congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquity.

DRADid not Achan the son of Zare transgress the commandment of the Lord, and his wrath lay upon all the people of Israel? And he was but one man, and would to God he alone had perished in his wickedness.

YLTDid not Achan son of Zerah commit a trespass in the devoted thing, and on all the company of Israel there was wrath? and he alone expired not in his iniquity.'

DrbyDid not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the accursed thing? and wrath fell on all the assembly of Israel, and he perished not alone in his iniquity.

RVDid not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the devoted thing, and wrath fell upon all the congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquity.

SLTDid not Achan transgress a transgression in the devoted thing, and upon all the assembly of Israel was wrath? and that man died not alone in his iniquity.

WbstrDid not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the accursed thing, and wrath fall on all the congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquity.

KJB-1769Did not Achan the son of Zerah commit a trespass in the accursed thing, and wrath fell on all the congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquity.

KJB-1611Did not Achan the sonne of Zerah commit a trespasse in the accursed thing, and wrath fell on all the Congregation of Israel? and that man perished not alone in his iniquitie.
   (Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from capitalisation)

BshpsDyd not Achan the sonne of Zareth trespasse greeuouslie in the accursed thyng, and wrath fell on all the congregation of Israel? and this man alone perished not in his wickednes.
   (Did not Achan the son of Zareth trespass grievouslie in the accursed thing, and wrath fell on all the congregation of Israel? and this man alone perished not in his wickedness.)

GnvaDid not Achan ye sonne of Zerah trespasse grieuously in the execrable thing, and wrath fell on all the Congregation of Israel? and this man alone perished not in his wickednesse.
   (Did not Achan ye/you_all son of Zerah trespass grievously in the execrable thing, and wrath fell on all the Congregation of Israel? and this man alone perished not in his wickedness.)

CvdlDid not Achan the sonne of Serah trespace in the thinge that was damned, and the wrath came ouer ye whole congregacion of Israel and he wente not downe alone for his mysdede?
   (Did not Achan the son of Serah trespass in the thing that was damned, and the wrath came over ye/you_all whole congregation of Israel and he went not down alone for his mysdede?)

WyclWhether not Achar, the sone of Zare, passide the comaundement of the Lord, and his ire felde on al the puple of Israel? And he was o man; and we wolden that he aloone hadde perischid in his trespas.
   (Whether not Achar, the son of Zare, passed the commandment of the Lord, and his ire field on all the people of Israel? And he was o man; and we wanted that he alone had perished in his trespass.)

LuthVersündigte sich nicht Achan, der Sohn Serahs, am Verbanneten, und der Zorn kam über die ganze Gemeine Israel, und er ging nicht allein unter über seiner Missetat?
   (Versündigte itself/yourself/themselves not Achan, the/of_the son Serahs, in/at/on_the Verbanneten, and the/of_the anger came above the whole/all community Israel, and he went not alone/only under above his misdeed/iniquity?)

ClVgNonne Achan filius Zare præteriit mandatum Domini, et super omnem populum Israël ira ejus incubuit? et ille erat unus homo, atque utinam solum periisset in scelere suo.
   (Isn’t_it Achan son Zare passed command(n) Master, and over all the_people Israel anger/rage his/her incubuit? and he/that_one was one man, and_yet I_wish only periisset in/into/on criminally his_own.)

UHBהֲ⁠ל֣וֹא ׀ עָכָ֣ן בֶּן־זֶ֗רַח מָ֤עַל מַ֨עַל֙ בַּ⁠חֵ֔רֶם וְ⁠עַֽל־כָּל־עֲדַ֥ת יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל הָ֣יָה קָ֑צֶף וְ⁠הוּא֙ אִ֣ישׁ אֶחָ֔ד לֹ֥א גָוַ֖ע בַּ⁠עֲוֺנֽ⁠וֹ׃פ

BrLXXΟὐκ ἰδοὺ Ἄχαρ ὁ τοῦ Ζαρᾶ πλημμελείᾳ ἐπλημμέλησεν ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀναθέματος, καὶ ἐπὶ πᾶσαν συναγωγὴν Ἰσραὴλ ἐγενήθη ὀργή; καὶ οὗτος εἷς αὐτὸς ἀπέθανε τῇ ἑαυτοῦ ἁμαρτίᾳ.

BrTrLo! did not Achar the son of Zara commit a trespass taking of the accursed thing, and there was wrath on the whole congregation of Israel? and he himself died alone in his own sin.

BI Jos 22:20 ©