Parallel 1COR 9:10

---

BSB Isn’t He actually speaking on our behalf? Indeed, this was written for us, because when the plowman plows and the thresher threshes, they should also expect to share in the harvest.

BLB Or is He speaking because of us entirely? For it was written for us, because in hope the one plowing ought to plow, and the one threshing, in hope to partake.

AICNT Or is he saying this certainly for us? For it was written for us that the one who plows should plow in hope, and the one threshing in hope should partake [[in hope]].

OEB Or is not is said entirely for our sakes? Surely it was written for our sakes, for the ploughman ought not to plough, nor the thrasher to thrash, without expecting a share of the grain.

WEB or does he say it assuredly for our sake? Yes, it was written for our sake, because he who plows ought to plow in hope, and he who threshes in hope should partake of his hope.

NET Or is he not surely speaking for our benefit? It was written for us, because the one plowing and threshing ought to work in hope of enjoying the harvest.

LSV Or by all means does He say [it] because of us? Yes, because of us it was written, because in hope ought the plower to plow, and he who is treading [ought] of his hope to partake in hope.

FBV Wasn't he directing this at us? Surely this was written for us—for anyone who plows should plow in hope and anyone who threshes should hope to share in the harvest.

TCNT Or does he speak entirely for our sake? Yes, this was written for our sake, because he who plows ought to plow in hope, and he who threshes in hope ought to partake of his hope.

T4T No, he was [RHQ] concerned about us, also! Yes, God caused Moses to write those words because he is concerned about us! Those who plow the ground confidently expect to eat some of the crop that grows. Those who thresh grain confidently expect to eat some of the grain that they thresh. Similarly, we who proclaim the message about Christ have the right to confidently expect to receive financial help for our work.

LEB Or doubtless does he speak for our sake? For it is writtenfor our sake, because the one who plows ought to plow in hope and the one who threshesought to do so in hope of a share.

BBE Or has he us in mind? Yes, it was said for us; because it is right for the ploughman to do his ploughing in hope, and for him who is crushing the grain to do his work hoping for a part in the fruits of it.

MOF No MOF 1COR book available

ASV or saith he it assuredly for our sake? Yea, for our sake it was written: because he that ploweth ought to plow in hope, and he that thresheth, to thresh in hope of partaking.

DRA Or doth he say this indeed for our sakes? For these things are written for our sakes: that he that plougheth, should plough in hope; and he that thrasheth, in hope to receive fruit.

YLT or because of us by all means doth He say [it]? yes, because of us it was written, because in hope ought the plower to plow, and he who is treading [ought] of his hope to partake in hope.

DBY or does he say [it] altogether for our sakes? For for our sakes it has been written, that the plougher should plough in hope, and he that treads out corn, in hope of partaking of [it].

RV or saith he it altogether for our sake? Yea, for our sake it was written: because he that ploweth ought to plow in hope, and he that thresheth, to thresh in hope of partaking.

WBS or saith he it altogether for our sake? Yea, for our sake it was written: because he that ploweth ought to plow in hope, and he that thresheth, to thresh in hope of partaking.

KJB Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope.

BB Either sayth he it not altogether for our sakes? For our sakes no doubt this is written, that he which eareth, should eare in hope: & that he which tressheth in hope, should be partaker of his hope.
  (Either saith/says he it not altogether for our sakes? For our sakes no doubt this is written, that he which eareth, should eare in hope: and that he which tressheth in hope, should be partaker of his hope.)

GNV Either saith hee it not altogether for our sakes? For our sakes no doubt it is written, that he which eareth, should eare in hope, and that he that thresheth in hope, should be partaker of his hope.
  (Either saith he it not altogether for our sakes? For our sakes no doubt it is written, that he which eareth, should eare in hope, and that he that thresheth in hope, should be partaker of his hope.)

CB Or sayeth he it not alltogether for oure sakes? For no doute it is wrytte for oure sakes. For he that eareth, shulde eare vpon hope: and he yt throssheth, shulde trosshe vpon hope, yt he mighte be partaker of his hope.
  (Or sayeth he it not alltogether for our sakes? For no doute it is written for our sakes. For he that eareth, should eare upon hope: and he it throssheth, should trosshe upon hope, it he mighte be partaker of his hope.)

TNT Ether sayth he it not all to gedder for oure sakes? For oure sakes no doute this is written: that he which eareth shuld eare in hope: and that he which thressheth in hope shuld be parttaker of his hope.
  (Ether saith/says he it not all together for our sakes? For our sakes no doute this is written: that he which eareth should eare in hope: and that he which thressheth in hope should be parttaker of his hope.)

WYC Whether for vs he seith these thingis? For whi tho ben writun for vs; for he that erith, owith to ere in hope, and he that threischith, in hope to take fruytis.
  (Whether for us he saith/says these things? For why tho been written for us; for he that erith, owith to ere in hope, and he that threischith, in hope to take fruytis.)

LUT Oder sagt er‘s nicht allerdinge um unsertwillen? Denn es ist ja um unsertwillen geschrieben. Denn der da pflüget, soll auf Hoffnung pflügen, und der da drischt, soll auf Hoffnung dreschen, daß er seiner Hoffnung teilhaftig werde.
  (Oder says er‘s not allerdinge around/by/for unsertwillen? Because it is ja around/by/for unsertwillen written. Because the there pflüget, should on Hoffnung pflügen, and the there drischt, should on Hoffnung dreschen, that he his Hoffnung teilhaftig become.)

CLV an propter nos utique hoc dicit? Nam propter nos scripta sunt: quoniam debet in spe qui arat, arare: et qui triturat, in spe fructus percipiendi.
  (an propter nos utique hoc dicit? Nam propter nos scripta sunt: quoniam debet in spe who arat, arare: and who triturat, in spe fructus percipiendi.)

UGNT ἢ δι’ ἡμᾶς πάντως λέγει? δι’ ἡμᾶς γὰρ ἐγράφη, ὅτι ὀφείλει ἐπ’ ἐλπίδι ὁ ἀροτριῶν ἀροτριᾶν, καὶ ὁ ἀλοῶν ἐπ’ ἐλπίδι τοῦ μετέχειν.
  (aʸ di’ haʸmas pantōs legei? di’ haʸmas gar egrafaʸ, hoti ofeilei ep’ elpidi ho arotriōn arotrian, kai ho aloōn ep’ elpidi tou meteⱪein.)

SBL-GNT ἢ διʼ ἡμᾶς πάντως λέγει; διʼ ἡμᾶς γὰρ ἐγράφη, ὅτι ⸂ὀφείλει ἐπʼ ἐλπίδι⸃ ὁ ἀροτριῶν ἀροτριᾶν, καὶ ὁ ἀλοῶν ⸂ἐπʼ ἐλπίδι τοῦ μετέχειν⸃.
  (aʸ diʼ haʸmas pantōs legei? diʼ haʸmas gar egrafaʸ, hoti ⸂ofeilei epʼ elpidi⸃ ho arotriōn arotrian, kai ho aloōn ⸂epʼ elpidi tou meteⱪein⸃.)

TC-GNT Ἢ δι᾽ ἡμᾶς πάντως λέγει; Δι᾽ ἡμᾶς γὰρ ἐγράφη, ὅτι ἐπ᾽ ἐλπίδι ὀφείλει ὁ ἀροτριῶν ἀροτριᾷν, καὶ ὁ ἀλοῶν τῆς ἐλπίδος αὐτοῦ μετέχειν ἐπ᾽ ἐλπίδι.
  (Aʸ di᾽ haʸmas pantōs legei? Di᾽ haʸmas gar egrafaʸ, hoti ep᾽ elpidi ofeilei ho arotriōn arotrian, kai ho aloōn taʸs elpidos autou meteⱪein ep᾽ elpidi.)

Key for above GNTs: yellow:punctuation differs, red:words differ (from our SR-GNT base).