Verse List for ROM 2:26

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

B I ◄ ← Rom 2:26 ↓ → ► ═ ©

Text critical issues=minor/spelling Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Narrator (All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV) so if uncircumcised people groups behave justly according to the law, even though they’re not physically circumcised, God will consider them as his people.

OET-LV Therefore if the uncircumcision, the just _acts of _the law may _be _keeping, not the uncircumcision of _him for circumcision will _be _being _counted?

ULT If, then, the uncircumcision keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be considered as circumcision?

UST So then, if uncircumcised people obey what God requires in the laws he gave the Jews, God will regard those uncircumcised people as being circumcised.

BSB If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, {will} not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

MSB If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, {will} not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

BLB Therefore if the uncircumcision keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

AICNT So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, {will not}[fn] his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

OEB If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the Law, won’t he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?

WEBBE & WMBB If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won’t his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

NET Therefore if the uncircumcised man obeys the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

LSV If, therefore, the uncircumcision may keep the righteousness of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

FBV If a man who is not circumcised[fn] keeps the law, he should be considered as being circumcised even though he's not.

TCNT If then an uncircumcised man keeps the ordinances of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

T4T This means that God will certainly consider that even non-Jews who are not circumcised can become his people if they obey the things that he commanded in his laws. [RHQ]

LEB Therefore, if the uncircumcised person follows the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?

BBE If those who have not circumcision keep the rules of the law, will it not be credited to them as circumcision?

Moff (If then the uncircumcised observe the requirements of the Law, shall not their uncircumcision be reckoned equivalent to circumcision?

Wymth In the same way if an uncircumcised man pays attention to the just requirements of the Law, shall not his lack of circumcision be overlooked, and,

ASV If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

DRA If, then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

YLT If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?

Drby If therefore the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision,

RV If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
(If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckon/counted/counted for circumcision?)

SLT Therefore if uncircumcision watch the justification of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

Wbstr Therefore, if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJB-1769 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

KJB-1611 Therefore, if the vncircumcision keepe the righteousnesse of the Law, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for Circumcision?
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from capitalisation and punctuation)

Bshps Therefore if the vncircumcisio kepe the ordinaunces of the law, shall not his vncircumcisio be counted for circumcisio?
(Therefore if the uncircumcisio keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcisio be counted for circumcisio?)

Gnva Therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the Lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
(Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?)

Cvdl Therfore yf the vncircumcision kepe the righte thinges conteyned in the lawe, shal not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
(Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the right things contained in the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?)

TNT Therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
(Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the right things contayned in the law: shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?)

Wycl Therfor if prepucie kepe the riytwisnessis of the lawe, whethir his prepucie schal not be arettid in to circumcisioun?
(Therefore if prepucie keep the riytwisnessis of the law, whether his prepucie shall not be reckoned/counted in to circumcision?)

Luth So nun die Vorhaut das Recht im Gesetz hält, meinest du nicht, daß seine Vorhaut werde für eine Beschneidung gerechnet?
(So now the foreskin the law/right in_the law holds, my you(sg) not, that his foreskin become for/in_favour_of a/one clipping/trimming(n) calculated?)

ClVg Si igitur præputium justitias legis custodiat, nonne præputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur?[fn]
(When/But_if therefore foreskin justices law keep/guard, isn’t_it foreskin of_that in/into/on circumcision will_be_considered?)

SR-GNT Ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία, τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται; ‡

UGNT ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία, τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται?

SBL-GNT ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, ⸀οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

RP-GNT Ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχὶ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

TC-GNT ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, [fn]οὐχὶ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;