Verse List for ROM 9:21

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

B I ◄ ← Rom 9:21 ↓ → ► ═ ©

Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Narrator (All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV) Doesn’t the potter have the right to split the lump of clay and make a beautiful bowl out of half and a chamber pot out of the other half?

OET-LV Or not is _having authority the potter over _the clay, out _of the same lump to _make one on _one _hand to honour vessel, on _the _other _hand one to dishonour?

ULT Or does the potter not have authority over the clay to make from the same lump not only what, is a vessel for honor, but also what, is for dishonor?

UST God can surely do whatever he wants to do with what he has made. In the same way, someone who makes containers can do whatever he wants to do with his materials. From the same material he can make both containers for special use and containers for ordinary use.

BSB & MSB {Does} not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and [another] for common use?

BLB Or does the potter not have authority over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel unto honor, but one unto dishonor?

AICNT Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?

OEB Has not the potter absolute power over their clay, so that out of the same lump they make one thing for better, and another for common, use?

WEBBE & WMBB Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

NET Has the potter no right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special use and another for ordinary use?

LSV Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?

FBV Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?[fn]

TCNT Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

T4T Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.

LEB Or does the potter not have authority over the clay, to make from the same lump a vessel that is for _⌊honorable use_⌋[fn] and one that is for _⌊ordinary use_⌋[fn]?

BBE Or has not the potter the right to make out of one part of his earth a vessel for honour, and out of another a vessel for shame?

Moff What! has the potter no right over the clay? Has he no right to make out of the same lump one vessel for a noble purpose and another for a menial?

Wymth Or has not the potter rightful power over the clay to make out of the same lump one vessel for more honourable and another for less honourable uses?

ASV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

DRA Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

YLT hath not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make the one vessel to honour, and the one to dishonour?

Drby Or has not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?

RV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
(Or hath/has not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?)

SLT Or has not the potter power over the clay, of the same mixture truly to make one vessel for honour, and one for dishonour.

Wbstr Hath not the potter power over the clay of the same lump to make one vessel to honor, and another to dishonor?

KJB-1769 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

KJB-1611 Hath not the potter power ouer the clay, of the same lumpe, to make one vessell vnto honour, and another vnto dishonour?
(Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lumpe, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?)

Bshps Hath not the potter power ouer the clay, euen of the same lumpe to make one vessel vnto honour, and another vnto dishonour?
(Hath not the potter power over the clay, even of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?)

Gnva Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
(Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lump one vessel to honour, and another unto dishonour?)

Cvdl Hath not the potter power, out of one lompe of claye to make one vessell vnto honoure, and another vnto dishonoure?
(Hath not the potter power, out of one lompe of clay to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonoure?)

TNT Hath not the potter power over the claye even of the same lompe to make one vessell vnto honoure and a nother vnto dishonoure?
(Hath not the potter power over the clay even of the same lompe to make one vessel unto honour and another unto dishonoure?)

Wycl Whether a potter of cley hath not power to make of the same gobet o vessel in to honour, an othere in to dispit?
(Whether a potter of clay hath/has not power to make of the same gobet o vessel in to honour, anothere in to dispit?)

Luth Hat nicht ein Töpfer Macht, aus einem Klumpen zu machen ein Faß zu Ehren und das andere zu Unehren?
(Has not a potter power(n), out_of on Klumpen to/for make a Faß to/for honour(n) and the other/different to/for Unehren?)

ClVg an non habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa facere aliud quidem vas in honorem, aliud vero in contumeliam?[fn]
(or not/no has power figulus luti from the_same lump/block(n) to_do something_else indeed vessel/utensil in/into/on honour, something_else indeed/however in/into/on insult?)

SR-GNT Ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ, ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος, ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν; ‡

UGNT ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ, ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος, ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν?

SBL-GNT ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν;

RP-GNT Ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ, ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος, ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν;

TC-GNT ἢ οὐκ ἔχει ἐξουσίαν ὁ κεραμεὺς τοῦ πηλοῦ ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ φυράματος ποιῆσαι ὃ μὲν εἰς τιμὴν σκεῦος ὃ δὲ εἰς ἀτιμίαν;