Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB BLB AICNT OEB WEB WMB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE MOF JPS ASV DRA YLT DBY RV WBS KJB BB GNV CB TNT WYC SR-GNT UHB Related Parallel Interlinear Dictionary Search
parallelVerse INT GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOS JDG RUTH 1SA 2SA 1KI 2KI 1CH 2CH EZRA NEH EST JOB PSA PRO ECC SNG ISA JER LAM EZE DAN HOS JOEL AMOS OBA YNA MIC NAH HAB ZEP HAG ZEC MAL YHN MARK MAT LUKE ACTs ROM 1COR 2COR GAL EPH PHP COL 1TH 2TH 1TIM 2TIM TIT PHM HEB YAC 1PET 2PET 1YHN 2YHN 3YHN YUD REV
Lev Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27
Lev 11 V1 V3 V5 V9 V11 V13 V15 V17 V19 V21 V23 V25 V27 V29 V31 V33 V35 V37 V39 V41 V43 V45 V47
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. This view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on the version abbreviation to see the verse in more of its context.
The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
OET (OET-RV) No OET-RV LEV 11:7 verse available
OET-LV And_DOM the_pig DOM [is]_dividing_in_two a_hoof it and_has_a_split a_cleft of_a_hoof and_he cud not it_ruminates [is]_unclean it for_you_all.
UHB וְאֶת־הַ֠חֲזִיר כִּֽי־מַפְרִ֨יס פַּרְסָ֜ה ה֗וּא וְשֹׁסַ֥ע שֶׁ֨סַע֙ פַּרְסָ֔ה וְה֖וּא גֵּרָ֣ה לֹֽא־יִגָּ֑ר טָמֵ֥א ה֖וּא לָכֶֽם׃ ‡
(vəʼet-haḩₐzīr ⱪiy-mafriyş parşāh hūʼ vəshoşaˊ sheşaˊ parşāh vəhūʼ gērāh loʼ-yiggār ţāmēʼ hūʼ lākem.)
Key: yellow:verbs, red:negative.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
ULT And the pig, because it is dividing the hoof and splitting the cleft of the hoof, but it itself does not chew the cud. It is unclean to you.
UST Pigs are likewise unacceptable to eat because, while they have hooves (and those hooves are completely cloven), they do not chew cud. Because of this, the people of Israel should also consider any animal like a pig to be impure and not acceptable to eat.
BSB • And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you.
OEB No OEB LEV book available
WEB The pig, because it has a split hoof, and is cloven-footed, but doesn’t chew the cud, is unclean to you.
NET The pig is unclean to you because its hoof is divided (the hoof is completely split in two ), even though it does not chew the cud.
LSV and the sow, though it is dividing the hoof, and cleaving the cleft of the hoof, yet it does not bring up the cud—it [is] unclean to you.
FBV The pig, which though it has a divided hoof doesn't chew the cud, so it is unclean for you.
T4T Pigs have completely split hooves but they do not chew their cuds, so they are unacceptable for you to eat.
LEB and the pig, because it has a divided hoof and has a split cleft in[fn] the hoof but it does not chew cud—itis unclean for you.
?:? Hebrew “of”
BBE And the pig is unclean to you, because though the horn of its foot is parted, its food does not come back.
MOF No MOF LEV book available
JPS And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is cloven-footed, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you.
ASV And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you.
DRA And the swine, which, though it divideth the hoof, cheweth not the cud.
YLT and the sow, though it is dividing the hoof, and cleaving the cleft of the hoof, yet the cud it bringeth not up — unclean it [is] to you.
DBY and the swine, for it hath cloven hoofs, and feet quite split open, but it cheweth not the cud — it shall be unclean unto you.
RV And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you.
WBS And the swine, though he divideth the hoof, and is cloven-footed, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.
KJB And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.
(And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you. )
BB And agayne the Swyne, though he deuide the hoofe, and is clouen footed, yet he chaweth not the cud, he is vncleane to you.
(And again the Swyne, though he deuide the hoofe, and is cloven footed, yet he chaweth not the cud, he is unclean to you.)
GNV And the swine, because he parteth ye hoofe and is clouen footed, but cheweth not the cud, he shalbe vncleane to you.
(And the swine, because he parteth ye/you_all hoofe and is cloven footed, but cheweth not the cud, he shall be unclean to you. )
CB And the Swyne deuydeth ye hoffe in to two clawes, but cheweth not the cud, therfore is it vncleane vnto you.
(And the Swyne deuydeth ye/you_all hoffe in to two clawes, but cheweth not the cud, therefore is it unclean unto you.)
WYC and a swiyn, that chewith not code, thouy he departith the clee.
(and a swiyn, that chewith not code, though he departith the clee.)
LUT Und ein Schwein spaltet wohl die Klauen, aber es wiederkäuet nicht; darum soll es euch unrein sein.
(And a Schwein spaltet wohl the Klauen, but it againkäuet nicht; therefore should it you unclean sein.)
CLV Et sus: qui cum ungulam dividat, non ruminat.
(And sus: who when/with ungulam dividat, not/no ruminat. )
BRN And the swine, because this animal divides the hoof, and makes claws of the hoof, and it does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.
BrLXX Καὶ τὸν ὗν, ὅτι διχηλεῖ ὁπλὴν τοῦτο, καὶ ὀνυχίζει ὄνυχας ὁπλῆς, καὶ τοῦτο οὐκ ἀνάγει μηρυκισμὸν, ἀκάθαρτον τοῦτο ὑμῖν.
(Kai ton ὗn, hoti diⱪaʸlei hoplaʸn touto, kai onuⱪizei onuⱪas hoplaʸs, kai touto ouk anagei maʸrukismon, akatharton touto humin. )
11:1–15:33 These chapters detail the regulations pertaining to purity. The mixing of types of animals was forbidden (see Deut 22:9-11) because it represented a violation of the normal created order. “Abnormal” creatures—such as fish without fins and scales, carnivores, crawling insects, and animals without split hooves—cross boundaries between “normal” types and were unfit for food or offerings (see also Deut 14:1-21). The dietary laws were meant to distinguish Israel as a holy people from the surrounding nations (Lev 11:44-45).
Note 1 topic: grammar-connect-logic-result
וְאֶת־הַ֠חֲזִיר כִּֽי
and=DOM the,pig that/for/because/then/when
The word because indicates that what follows is a reason for what came before. Use a connector in your language that makes it clear that what follows is a reason for what came before. Alternate translation: “Likewise, you shall not eat the pig. This is because”
Note 2 topic: translate-unknown
וְאֶת־הַ֠חֲזִיר
and=DOM the,pig
This pig is a hoofed swine with a flat snout for rooting in the soil. If your readers would not be familiar with this type of animal, you could use the name of something similar in your area or you could use a more general term.
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / genericnoun
וְאֶת־הַ֠חֲזִיר
and=DOM the,pig
The expression the pig does not refer to a specific animal. It describes any pig that an Israelite might encounter in their daily life. Express this in the way that would be most natural in your language. Alternate translation: “And a pig”
Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / explicit
כִּֽי־מַפְרִ֨יס פַּרְסָ֜ה ה֗וּא וְשֹׁסַ֥ע שֶׁ֨סַע֙ פַּרְסָ֔ה וְה֖וּא גֵּרָ֣ה לֹֽא־יִגָּ֑ר
that/for/because/then/when divided hoof he/it and,has_a_split cleft hoof and=he cud not chew
Like rock badgers and rabbits, pigs meet one condition, but not both. While it possesses a completely cloven hoof, it does not chew cud. Because of this, pigs should be considered unclean. It may be helpful to clarify this for your readers in a footnote or in the text of your translation.
Note 5 topic: figures-of-speech / parallelism
כִּֽי־מַפְרִ֨יס פַּרְסָ֜ה ה֗וּא וְשֹׁסַ֥ע שֶׁ֨סַע֙ פַּרְסָ֔ה
that/for/because/then/when divided hoof he/it and,has_a_split cleft hoof
These two phrases mean basically the same thing. The second emphasizes the meaning of the first by repeating the same idea with different words. If it would be helpful to your readers, you could connect the phrases with a word other than and in order to show that the second phrase is repeating the first one, not saying something additional. Alternate translation: “because it is dividing the hoof in a way that splits the cleft of the hooves completely”
Note 6 topic: writing-poetry
מַפְרִ֨יס פַּרְסָ֜ה ה֗וּא
divided hoof he/it
See how you translated these repeated words in 11:5.
Note 7 topic: writing-poetry
וְשֹׁסַ֥ע שֶׁ֨סַע֙ פַּרְסָ֔ה
and,has_a_split cleft hoof
Here, words are being repeated for emphasis. The verb splitting comes from the same root as the noun cleft. You may be able to use the same construction in your language to express the meaning here. Alternatively, your language may have another way of showing the emphasis. Alternate translation: “and its hooves are completely divided”
Note 8 topic: writing-poetry
וְה֖וּא גֵּרָ֣ה לֹֽא־יִגָּ֑ר
and=he cud not chew
Here, words are being repeated for emphasis. Here, the verb chew comes from the same root as the noun cud. You may be able to use the same construction in your language to express the meaning here. Alternatively, your language may have another way of showing the emphasis. Alternate translation: “but it itself does not chew cud”
Note 9 topic: figures-of-speech / rpronouns
וְה֖וּא גֵּרָ֣ה לֹֽא־יִגָּ֑ר
and=he cud not chew
This expression the word itself to emphasize that pig does not chew the cud. Use a way that is natural in your language to indicate this significance. Alternate translation: “but it itself never chews cud”