Verse List for MAT 12:5

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

B I ◄ ← Mat 12:5 ↓ → ► ═ ©

Text critical issues=small word differences Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Yeshua (All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV) Or haven’t you understood that when the priests work in the temple on the rest day, it’s against the law, and yet they’re innocent?

OET-LV Or you _all_ not _read in the law that on _the days _of _rest the priests in the temple are _profaning the day _of _rest, and they _are innocent?

ULT Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbaths the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, but are innocent?

UST Likewise, consider the laws in the Scriptures that permit priests to work during the Jewish days of rest because they are serving in the Jewish sanctuary.

BSB & MSB Or haven ’t you read in the Law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and yet are innocent?

BLB Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are guiltless?

AICNT “Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are guiltless?

OEB And haven’t you read in the law that, on the Sabbath, the priest in the Temple break the Sabbath and yet are not guilty?

WEBBE & WMBB Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath day the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are guiltless?

NET Or have you not read in the law that the priests in the temple desecrate the Sabbath and yet are not guilty?

LSV Or did you not read in the Law that on the Sabbaths the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless?

FBV Haven't you read in the law that on the Sabbath day the priests in the Temple break the Sabbath but are not considered guilty?

TCNT Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and yet are guiltless?

T4T Also, think about the laws that Moses wrote [RHQ]. He said that even though the priests, by working in the Temple on our Jewish day of rest, are not obeying the Jewish day of rest laws, they are not guilty. You have surely read that, but you do not understand what it means.

LEB Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple violate the sanctity of the Sabbath and are guiltless?

BBE Or is it not said in the law, how the Sabbath is broken by the priests in the Temple and they do no wrong?

Moff Have you not read in the Law that the priests in the temple are not guilty when they desecrate the sabbath?

Wymth And have you not read in the Law how on the Sabbath the priests in the Temple break the Sabbath without incurring guilt?

ASV Or have ye not read in the law, that on the sabbath day the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are guiltless?

DRA Or have ye not read in the law, that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple break the sabbath, and are without blame?

YLT 'Or did ye not read in the Law, that on the sabbaths the priests in the temple do profane the sabbath, and are blameless?

Drby Or have ye not read in the law that on the sabbaths the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?

RV Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath day the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are guiltless?
(Or have ye/you_all not read in the law, how that on the sabbath day the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are guiltless?)

SLT Or have ye not read in the law, that in the sabbaths, the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are innocent?

Wbstr Or have ye not read in the law, that on the sabbath the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?

KJB-1769 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
(Or have ye/you_all not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?)

KJB-1611 Or haue yee not read in the law, how that on the Sabbath dayes the Priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath, and are blamelesse?
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from capitalisation)

Bshps Or haue ye not read in the lawe, howe that on the Sabbath dayes the priestes in the temple prophane the Sabbath, and are blamelesse?
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from capitalisation)

Gnva Or haue ye not read in the Lawe, how that on the Sabbath dayes the Priestes in the Temple breake the Sabbath, and are blameles?
(Or have ye/you_all not read in the Law, how that on the Sabbath days the Priests in the Temple break the Sabbath, and are blameles?)

Cvdl Or haue ye not red in the lawe how that the prestes in the temple breake the Sabbath, and yet are blamelesse?
(Or have ye/you_all not red in the law how that the priests in the temple break the Sabbath, and yet are blameless?)

TNT Or have ye not reed in the lawe how that the prestes in the temple breake the saboth daye and yet are blamlesse?
(Or have ye/you_all not red in the law how that the priests in the temple break the sabbath day and yet are blamlesse?)

Wycl Or whether ye han not red in the lawe, that in sabotis prestis in the temple defoulen the sabotis, and thei ben with oute blame?
(Or whether ye/you_all have not red in the law, that in sabotis priests in the temple defiling the sabotis, and they been without blame?)

Luth Oder habt ihr nicht gelesen im Gesetz, wie die Priester am Sabbat im Tempel den Sabbat brechen und sind doch ohne Schuld?
(Or have you(pl)/their/her not read in_the law, as/like the priest(s) in/at/on_the sabbath in_the temple the sabbath break(v) and are though/but without fault/blame(n)?)

ClVg aut non legistis in lege quia sabbatis sacerdotes in templo sabbatum violant, et sine crimine sunt?[fn]
(or not/no have_you_read in/into/on lawfully because sabbaths priests in/into/on temple sabbath violant, and without crime are?)

SR-GNT Ἢ οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε ἐν τῷ νόμῳ ὅτι τοῖς Σάββασιν οἱ ἱερεῖς ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ τὸ Σάββατον βεβηλοῦσιν, καὶ ἀναίτιοί εἰσιν; ‡

UGNT ἢ οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε ἐν τῷ νόμῳ, ὅτι τοῖς Σάββασιν οἱ ἱερεῖς ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ τὸ Σάββατον βεβηλοῦσιν, καὶ ἀναίτιοί εἰσιν?

SBL-GNT ἢ οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε ἐν τῷ νόμῳ ὅτι τοῖς σάββασιν οἱ ἱερεῖς ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ τὸ σάββατον βεβηλοῦσιν καὶ ἀναίτιοί εἰσιν;

RP-GNT Ἢ οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε ἐν τῷ νόμῳ, ὅτι τοῖς σάββασιν οἱ ἱερεῖς ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ τὸ σάββατον βεβηλοῦσιν, καὶ ἀναίτιοί εἰσιν;

TC-GNT ἢ οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε ἐν τῷ νόμῳ, ὅτι τοῖς σάββασιν οἱ ἱερεῖς ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ τὸ σάββατον βεβηλοῦσι, καὶ ἀναίτιοί εἰσι;