Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
Hos C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
Hos 4 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19
OET (OET-RV) ⇔ The more the priests multiplied, the more they sinned against me.
⇔ → I will change their high status into shame.
In this section, the LORD promised to punish the priests more severely than anyone else, because they were the ones who led the people to worship false gods.
Here are some other examples of section headings:
The Lord Accuses the Priests (GNT)
Against the Priests (NJB)
In this paragraph, the LORD gave more details about the sinful behavior of the priests (4:7–8). He then described his response to that behavior (4:9–11a).
As in chapter 2, the Hebrew pronouns alternate between “you” and “she.” In 4:4–6 the LORD used “you” when speaking to the priests, but in 4:7–10, he referred to the same priests as “they.” The BSB uses the pronoun “they.” The GNT continues to use “you.” Use a natural way in your language to refer to the priests. Be consistent throughout this paragraph. It should be clear in your translation that the LORD is speaking here to the same group of priests as in 4:4–6.
The more they multiplied, the more they sinned against Me;
¶ “As the priests increased, their sins against me also increased.
¶ “Whenever you(plur) priests became more numerous and more important, you also sinned more against me.
The more they multiplied, the more they sinned against Me: There is a close connection here between the priests increasing and their sins increasing.
Here are some other ways to express this connection:
Whenever the priests increased, their sins also increased.
The priests kept increasing. When that happened, they also sinned more and more.
they: The pronoun they refers to the priests.
multiplied: The word multiplied refers partly to an increase in the number of priests. Some versions make this idea explicit. For example:
The more of you priests there are, the more you sin against me (GNT)
However, the word multiplied probably also refers to an increase in their prestige and power. As their power grew, so did their sin and so did their influence to corrupt the people.Stuart (pages 78–79) and Macintosh (pages 141–142).
Here is another way to express their increase in both numbers and prestige:
The more their numbers and influence grew, the more their sins against me grew.
sinned: In Hebrew, the form of the verb sinned indicates here that the sinful behavior of the priests was habitual. Some versions, such as the BSB, use past tense to indicate this. Other versions use present tense. For example:
the more they sin against me (NLT)
Use a natural way in your language to indicate that the sinful pattern of behavior of the priests was already established.
they exchanged their Glory for a thing of disgrace.
I will take away their high status as my priests, and they will be humiliated/disgraced.
So I will change your(plur) dignity/honor into shame/disgrace.
This verse part is the result of 4:7a. The result of the priests’ increasing sinfulness is that the LORD will humiliate them. For example:
therefore will I change their glory into shame (KJV)
So I’ll turn their honor into disgrace (Voice)
Most versions leave this relationship implied.
The ESV has been used as the source line for 4:7b, because it follows the textual recommendation regarding the pronoun “I” or “they.” It also follows the recommended interpretation regarding “glory” or “Glory.” Notice that the NET and NRSV followed textual option (2), but chose interpretation (1).
(ESV) I will change their glory into shame: There is a textual issue here:
The Masoretic Text has “I will exchange their glory.”The MT is supported by Hubbard (page 102), Keil (page 78), Macintosh (page 141), and Pusey (page 49). Wood (page 186) and McComiskey (page 63) follow the MT, but do not discuss the textual issue. This statement continues the pattern that was set in 4:6. The pattern is that the LORD responds to the sin of the priests with a statement of judgment. Here the LORD’s judgment is that he will take away the glory of the priests and give them something disgraceful instead. (CEV, ESV, GNT, GW, KJV, NASB, NCV, NJPS, REB, RSV)
An ancient scribal tradition has “They have exchanged their glory.”According to the NET footnote on this verse, the Masoretic scribes intentionally made this change, because they believed that the received consonantal text was corrupt. This variant is also supported by Andersen and Freedman (page 355) and Stuart (page 72). This tradition is followed by the Targum and by the ancient Syriac translation. In this context, it indicates that the priests rejected their Glory (God) and accepted something disgraceful instead. (BSB, NET, NIV, NJB, NLT, NRSV)
It is recommended that you follow option (1) along with most versions and commentaries. The MT makes good sense and fits the overall context of the LORD’s punishment of the priests.
(ESV) their glory: There are two main ways to interpret this phrase:
It refers to the glory or honor of the priests. It may refer to their wealth and power or to the high status they enjoyed in the eyes of the people. For example:
their dignity (NJPS)
your honor (GNT) (CEV, ESV, GNT, GW, KJV, NASB, NCV, NET, NJPS, NRSV, REB)Notice that the NRSV preferred “their” to “I” in the textual issue, but here it followed “glory” (small g). The NET also changed their preference in the interpretation issue. It has “their glorious calling.”
It refers to God, the Glory of Israel. This is the way this phrase is understood in Psalm 106:20 and Jeremiah 2:11. For example:
their Glory (NIV)
the glory of God (NLT) (BSB, NIV, NJB, NLT)
It is recommended that you follow interpretation (1) along with most versions and commentaries. This interpretation better fits the context, because the previous high status of the priests contrasts with their shameful removal from the priesthood.
(ESV) shame: In Hebrew, this word here means disgrace, humiliation, or dishonor. It is the opposite of glory and honor.TWOT (#2024a, qalon). See also BDB (#3519, page 459). It identifies sense 3 “honour, dignity of position” as being an antithesis to qalon in Hosea 4:7.
Here are some other ways to translate this whole verse part:
I will take away their honor and give them shame. (NCV)
and so I will turn your honor into disgrace (GNT)
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
(Occurrence 0) They exchanged their honor for shame
(Some words not found in UHB: as,increased,they yes/correct/thus/so sinned to=me glory_of,their for,shame change )
This could mean: (1) “honor” is a metonym that represents Yahweh, and “shame” is a metonym that represents idols. Alternate translation: “They have stopped worshiping me, their honorable God, and now worship shameful idols” or (2) some Bible versions translate this as “I will exchange their honor for shame.” This means Yahweh will take away the things which the priests honor and cause the priests to be ashamed.
OET (OET-RV) ⇔ The more the priests multiplied, the more they sinned against me.
⇔ → I will change their high status into shame.
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.