OET interlinear REV 4:11

uW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / abstractnouns

ἄξιος εἶ, ὁ Κύριος καὶ ὁ Θεὸς ἡμῶν, λαβεῖν τὴν δόξαν καὶ τὴν τιμὴν καὶ τὴν δύναμιν

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Ἄξιος εἶ ὁ Κύριος καί ὁ Θεός ἡμῶν λαβεῖν τήν δόξαν καί τήν τιμήν καί τήν δύναμιν ὅτι σύ ἔκτισας τά παντᾶ καί διά τό θέλημα σοῦ ἦσαν καί ἐκτίσθησαν)

If your language does not use abstract nouns for the idea of glory, honor, and power, you could express the same ideas in another way. The UST models one way to do this.

Note 2 topic: writing-pronouns

σὺ ἔκτισας

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Ἄξιος εἶ ὁ Κύριος καί ὁ Θεός ἡμῶν λαβεῖν τήν δόξαν καί τήν τιμήν καί τήν δύναμιν ὅτι σύ ἔκτισας τά παντᾶ καί διά τό θέλημα σοῦ ἦσαν καί ἐκτίσθησαν)

For emphasis, the elders are stating the pronoun you, whose meaning is already present in the verb have created. If your language can state implied pronouns explicitly for emphasis, you may want to use that construction here in your translation. Other languages may have other ways of expressing this emphasis. Alternate translation: [it was you who created]

Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / doublet

ἦσαν, καὶ ἐκτίσθησαν

˱they˲_were (Some words not found in SR-GNT: Ἄξιος εἶ ὁ Κύριος καί ὁ Θεός ἡμῶν λαβεῖν τήν δόξαν καί τήν τιμήν καί τήν δύναμιν ὅτι σύ ἔκτισας τά παντᾶ καί διά τό θέλημα σοῦ ἦσαν καί ἐκτίσθησαν)

The expressions existed and were created mean similar things. The elders are using the two expressions together for emphasis. If it would be clearer for your readers, you could express the emphasis with a single phrase. Alternate translation: [they came into being]