InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEUT JOB YEHO (JOS) HERO (JDG) RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG YOEL (JOEL) MIC ISA ZEP HAB YIR (JER) LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBAD DAN EZEK EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL 2 PS WIS TOB MAN BAR G DAN G ESD L ESD ESG JDT 3 MAC SIR 1 MAC 2 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL LAOD PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
InterlinearVerse Dan C1 C2 C3 C4 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12
Dan 5 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V31
People tagged in the matching LV passage: Belshazzar
OET-LV On_it on_the_night he_was_killed Bēləshaʼʦʦar Oh/the_king the_Kasdaye[fn].
5:30 OSHB variant note: כשדי/א: (x-qere) ’כַשְׂדָּאָֽ/ה’: lemma=3779 n=0 morph=ANgmsd/Td id=27Ade כַשְׂדָּאָֽ/ה
The author continued to write in the Aramaic language. He wrote about how King Belshazzar gave a big banquet and made use of the sacred treasures from the Jerusalem temple. Belshazzar saw a hand writing a mysterious message on the wall. Only Daniel was able to explain the message, that God was about to punish Belshazzar. That same night an army of Medes and Persians conquered the city and killed Belshazzar.
English versions give different headings to Daniel 5. These include:
The Handwriting on the Wall (GW)
The Writing on the Wall (NIV)
King Belshazzar’s Banquet (CEV)
In some languages it may be more natural to write the heading in the form of a clause. For example, you could say:
King Belshazzar saw a hand write on the wall.
King Belshazzar had/gave a banquet/feast.
Some versions give headings to the subsections of Daniel 5. For example, the NLT has two headings:
The Writing on the Wall (5:1)
Daniel explains the writing (5:13)
The NRSV has three headings:
Belshazzar’s Feast (5:1)
The Writing on the Wall (5:5)
The Writing on the Wall Interpreted (5:13)
You should decide the number of headings that is best in your translation. The purpose of headings is to help readers to follow the events of the story. Headings also help the reader understand the relationships between the different parts of the story. You should try not to have more headings than necessary.
Historical Background:
Nabonidus was the king of Babylon from 556 to 539 B.C. Historical records indicate that he married Nitocris, the daughter of Nebuchadnezzar, and that Belshazzar was their oldest son.See the ancient Greek historian Herodotus and the Nabonidus Chronicles. While Nabonidus was absent from Babylon during the last ten years of his reign, Belshazzar acted as king in his place.
Daniel 5 describes the last night of the Babylonian empire. From other historic sources we know that Cyrus, the king of Persia, attacked the Babylonian army during the 7th month of the year 539 B.C. On the 15th day of that month, they attacked the town of Sippar and King Nabonidus fled. The next day Cyrus’ army entered the city of Babylon without any battle and killed its ruler, Belshazzar. Daniel 5 describes what Belshazzar was doing on the last day of the Babylonian empire.
A new topic begins at 5:30. The text summarizes what happened later that evening. The Medes and Persians attacked Babylon and killed King Belshazzar.
That very night Belshazzar king of the Chaldeans was slain,
¶ That same night, Belshazzar, the king of the Babylonians, was killed.
¶ That night enemy soldiers killed Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians.
¶ That was the night that the Medes and Persians attacked Babylon and killed King Belshazzar.
That very night: The Aramaic expression that the BSB translates That very night refers to the night following the celebration feast/banquet (5:1–4).
Belshazzar king of the Chaldeans was slain: The Aramaic word that the BSB translates as was slain means “was killed.” The same verb occurs in 5:19b This is a passive clause. If an active clause is more natural in your language, you can say:
they (indefinite) killed Belshazzar, the Chaldean king.
enemies attacked Babylon and killed Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians.
the Medes and the Persians attacked Babylon and killed King Belshazzar
king of the Chaldeans: In this context, the Aramaic word that the BSB literally translates as Chaldeans, refers to people from Chaldea, that is, Babylon.HALOT, 1903. There are several ways to translate this:
Use the more general name that refers to these people. For example:
Babylonian king (NLT)
king of Babylonia (GNT)
king of the Babylonian people (NCV)
Use a name that is based on the name Chaldeans. For example:
king of the Chald-people
king of the Chaldeans (REB)
the Chaldean king (RSV)
Include a reference to both of the names above. For example,
king of the Chaldeans, that is, the Babylonians.
Since Babylon has been mentioned previously, a reference to “Babylonians” here may be the best choice. However, if the church in your area prefers the name “Chaldean,” you may want to include it in a footnote. The footnote should explain that these two names refer to the same people.
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / activepassive
קְטִ֕יל
killed
The expression was killed is a passive verbal form. If it would be unnatural to use that form, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. Alternate translation: [met his death]
OET-LV On_it on_the_night he_was_killed Bēləshaʼʦʦar Oh/the_king the_Kasdaye[fn].
5:30 OSHB variant note: כשדי/א: (x-qere) ’כַשְׂדָּאָֽ/ה’: lemma=3779 n=0 morph=ANgmsd/Td id=27Ade כַשְׂדָּאָֽ/ה
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.