Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
Dan C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12
Dan 5 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V30 V31
OET (OET-LV) then were_going_in[fn] all_of the_wise_men_of Oh/the_king and_not they_were_able the_writing to_read_aloud and_its_interpretation[fn] to_make_known to_the_king.
OET (OET-RV) When all the king’s wise men of the king got there, none of them could read the writing or tell the king what it meant.
The author continued to write in the Aramaic language. He wrote about how King Belshazzar gave a big banquet and made use of the sacred treasures from the Jerusalem temple. Belshazzar saw a hand writing a mysterious message on the wall. Only Daniel was able to explain the message, that God was about to punish Belshazzar. That same night an army of Medes and Persians conquered the city and killed Belshazzar.
English versions give different headings to Daniel 5. These include:
The Handwriting on the Wall (GW)
The Writing on the Wall (NIV)
King Belshazzar’s Banquet (CEV)
In some languages it may be more natural to write the heading in the form of a clause. For example, you could say:
King Belshazzar saw a hand write on the wall.
King Belshazzar had/gave a banquet/feast.
Some versions give headings to the subsections of Daniel 5. For example, the NLT has two headings:
The Writing on the Wall (5:1)
Daniel explains the writing (5:13)
The NRSV has three headings:
Belshazzar’s Feast (5:1)
The Writing on the Wall (5:5)
The Writing on the Wall Interpreted (5:13)
You should decide the number of headings that is best in your translation. The purpose of headings is to help readers to follow the events of the story. Headings also help the reader understand the relationships between the different parts of the story. You should try not to have more headings than necessary.
Historical Background:
Nabonidus was the king of Babylon from 556 to 539 B.C. Historical records indicate that he married Nitocris, the daughter of Nebuchadnezzar, and that Belshazzar was their oldest son.See the ancient Greek historian Herodotus and the Nabonidus Chronicles. While Nabonidus was absent from Babylon during the last ten years of his reign, Belshazzar acted as king in his place.
Daniel 5 describes the last night of the Babylonian empire. From other historic sources we know that Cyrus, the king of Persia, attacked the Babylonian army during the 7th month of the year 539 B.C. On the 15th day of that month, they attacked the town of Sippar and King Nabonidus fled. The next day Cyrus’ army entered the city of Babylon without any battle and killed its ruler, Belshazzar. Daniel 5 describes what Belshazzar was doing on the last day of the Babylonian empire.
The king summoned his advisers to interpret the writing on the wall. A number of English versions begin a new paragraph at this verse.
So all the king’s wise men came in,
All the king’s wise/expert advisers entered the banquet hall/room,
Although all the king’s scholars/experts came forward,
So: The Aramaic connector that the BSB translates as So here introduces a new stage in the action in an emphatic way.
all the king’s wise men came in: The Aramaic verb that the BSB translates as came in is literally “were going in. It probably refers to the entrance of the various wise men into the very room where the lamp was shining and the words were visible. Perhaps the king had got up from the banquet hall and gone outside the room to wait for and speak to the wise men in the previous verse. Now they entered the dining hall to see what the writing was. There is implied information here: after entering, the wise men looked at the writing on the wall. In some languages it may be natural to imply this by indicating that the wise men approached the writing. For example:
The royal advisers came forward (GNT)
but they could not read the inscription or interpret it for him.
but they were unable to read the writing or explain what the words meant.
none of them could read the words on the wall and none of them could interpret/explain their meaning.
but: The Aramaic connector that the BSB translates as but here introduces a contrast. Although all the wise advisers came and looked at the writing, none of them could read the message. Translate this contrast in a way that is natural in your language.
they could not read the inscription: The text does not say why the king and his guests could not read the writing. Possibly the letters on the wall were only consonants, with no vowel marks. Or possibly they were in a script that those present did not know, rather than the usual Aramaic script.
or interpret it for him: The Aramaic text says literally “and make known to the king the interpretation.” The Aramaic verb meaning “make known” is different from the verb in 5:7c, but it has the same meaning, “inform, cause to know.” Other ways to translate this include:
or tell him what it meant (NLT)
or explain its meaning
or interpret its message
5:8 As before, the Babylonian wise men were unable to interpret the omen (cp. 2:4-11; 4:7; 5:15).
OET (OET-LV) then were_going_in[fn] all_of the_wise_men_of Oh/the_king and_not they_were_able the_writing to_read_aloud and_its_interpretation[fn] to_make_known to_the_king.
OET (OET-RV) When all the king’s wise men of the king got there, none of them could read the writing or tell the king what it meant.
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.