InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEUT JOB YEHO (JOS) HERO (JDG) RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG YOEL (JOEL) MIC ISA ZEP HAB YIR (JER) LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBAD DAN EZEK EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL 2 PS WIS TOB MAN BAR G DAN G ESD L ESD ESG JDT 3 MAC SIR 1 MAC 2 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL LAOD PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
InterlinearVerse Ecc C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12
Ecc 2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26
OET-LV And_ I _I_turned to_see wisdom and_madness(es) and_folly if/because what the_humankind who_he_will_come after the_king DOM that_which already people_have_done_it.
OET (OET-RV) Then I changed direction to investigate wisdom and madness and folly,
⇔ because what could any future king do that hasn’t already been done?
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / abstractnouns
חָכְמָ֔ה וְהוֹלֵל֖וֹת וְסִכְל֑וּת
wisdom and,madness(es) and,folly
If your language does not use abstract nouns for the ideas of wisdom and madness and folly, you could express the same ideas in other ways. Alternate translation: [what is wise and what is mad and what is foolish]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / doublet
וְהוֹלֵל֖וֹת וְסִכְל֑וּת
and,madness(es) and,folly
Solomon is using the question form to assert that no future king could do more than what has already been done. If a speaker of your language would not use the question form for that purpose, you could translate this as a statement or as an exclamation. Alternate translation: [and foolishness, because no one who comes after the king can do more than what he has already done]
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / rquestion
The pronoun he refers to the person who will come after the king, that is, Solomon’s successor. It may be helpful to clarify this for your readers. Alternate translation: [there is nothing the person who will come after the king can do beyond what that successor has already done]
Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / ellipsis
Solomon is speaking of his investigation of wisdom and folly as if he physically turned to look at them. Your language may have a comparable expression that you can use in your translation, or you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: [what more can the person do who will come after the king than that which he has already done]
Note 5 topic: writing-pronouns
וּפָנִ֤יתִֽי אֲנִי֙
and,I_turned I
Solomon is stating the pronoun I separately, even though the verb translated as turned already includes this meaning. He is doing that to emphasize that he himself is the one evaluating these matters. If a speaker of your language would use an explicit pronoun for the same purpose, you may want to use that construction in your translation. If not, your language may have other ways of showing the meaning here.
OET-LV And_ I _I_turned to_see wisdom and_madness(es) and_folly if/because what the_humankind who_he_will_come after the_king DOM that_which already people_have_done_it.
OET (OET-RV) Then I changed direction to investigate wisdom and madness and folly,
⇔ because what could any future king do that hasn’t already been done?
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.