OET OET-RV OET-LV GHT ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Parallel Simple Interlinear Topics Reference Dictionary Search
ParallelVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
Jos Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24
Jos 16 V1 V2 V3 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not necessarily natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for Bible-translators and others doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal Speaker(s)=Narrator (All still tentative.)
OET (OET-RV) So Yosef’s sons Menashsheh and Efrayim received an inheritance.![]()
OET-LV And_ the_descendants_of _they_received_their_inheritance of_Yōşēf Mənashsheh and_ʼEfrayim.![]()
UHB וַיִּנְחֲל֥וּ בְנֵי־יוֹסֵ֖ף מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה וְאֶפְרָֽיִם׃ ‡
(vayyinḩₐlū ⱱənēy-yōşēf mənashsheh vəʼefrāyim.)
Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
BrLXX Καὶ ἐκληρονόμησαν οἱ υἱοὶ Ἱωσὴφ, Ἐφραῒμ καὶ Μανασσή.
(Kai eklaʸronomaʸsan hoi huioi Hiōsaʸf, Efraim kai Manassaʸ.)
BrTr And the sons of Joseph, Ephraim and Manasse, took their inheritance.
ULT And the sons of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, inherited.
UST That was the territory that the descendants of Joseph, the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim, received as their permanent possession.
BSB & MSB So Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph, received their inheritance.
OEB Such was the property received by the Josephites, that is Manasseh and Ephraim, as their inheritance.
WEBBE & WMBB The children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
NET Joseph’s descendants, Manasseh and Ephraim, were assigned their land.
LSV And the sons of Joseph—Manasseh and Ephraim—inherit.
FBV This was the allocation received by the descendants of Joseph, Ephraim and Manasseh.
T4T That is the land that the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh were allotted.
LEB And the descendants[fn] of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, received their inheritance.
16:4 Or “sons”
BBE And the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their heritage.
Moff Such was the property received by the Josephites, Manasseh and Ephraim, as their inheritance.
JPS And the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
ASV And the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
DRA And Manasses and Ephraim the children of Joseph possessed it.
YLT And the sons of Joseph — Manasseh and Ephraim — inherit.
Drby And the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
RV And the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
SLT And the sons of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, will inherit.
Wbstr So the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
KJB-1769 So the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.
KJB-1611 So the children of Ioseph, Manasseh, and Ephraim, tooke their inheritance.
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from punctuation)
Bshps And so the children of Ioseph, Manasses, & Ephraim, toke their inheritaunce.
(And so the children of Yoseph, Manasses, and Ephraim, took their inheritance.)
Gnva So the children of Ioseph, Manasseh and Ephraim tooke their inheritance.
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from punctuation)
Cvdl This the children of Ioseph (Manasses & Ephraim) receaued to enheritaunce.
(This the children of Yoseph (Manasses and Ephraim) received to inheritance.)
Wycl whiche cuntreis Manasses and Effraym, the sones of Joseph, weldiden.
(which countries Manasses and Ephraim, the sons of Yoseph, possessed.)
Luth Das haben zum Erbteil genommen die Kinder Josephs, Manasse und Ephraim.
(The have for_the inheritance taken the children Joseph’s, Manasseh and Ephraim.)
ClVg possederuntque filii Joseph, Manasses et Ephraim.
(and_they_possessed children Yoseph, Manasses and Ephraim.)
This section describes the boundaries of the land given to Ephraim and to Manasseh, and the towns within each of their lands.
So Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph, received their inheritance.
So the descendants of Joseph, that is the clans of Ephraim and Manasseh, received this land as their inheritance.
The sons of Joseph, which were the clans of Ephraim and Manasseh, received their land according to the boundary lines given above.
So Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph, received their inheritance: This verse is the conclusion to the paragraph. It may be helpful to add a conjunction or a phrase which shows that this is a conclusion, like the BSB does with So. For another example:
The people of Joseph, namely Manasseh and Ephraim, received their land according to the boundary lines given above
Ephraim and Manasseh: It may be helpful to state that the clans of Ephraim and Manasseh are the descendants of Joseph. For example:
the descendants of Joseph, that is, the clans of Ephraim and Manasseh
Manasseh: Manasseh was the first son of Joseph so he is listed first in the Hebrew. In the paragraph that follows, the land that Ephraim received is described before that of Manasseh. This reflects the story in Genesis 48, in which Joseph blessed Ephraim before he blessed Manasseh.Woudstra p.256.
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metaphor
בְנֵי־יוֹסֵ֖ף מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה וְאֶפְרָֽיִם
sons_of Yōşēf/(Joseph) (Some words not found in UHB: and,they_received_their_inheritance sons_of Yōşēf/(Joseph) Mənashsheh and,Ephraim )
The author is speaking as if the people of the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh were actually the sons of Joseph. Alternate translation: [And the descendants of Joseph, the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
וַיִּנְחֲל֥וּ
(Some words not found in UHB: and,they_received_their_inheritance sons_of Yōşēf/(Joseph) Mənashsheh and,Ephraim )
As the Introduction to Joshua discusses, here and throughout this chapter, the author is using the idea of inheriting by association to mean receiving a lasting possession that would be passed down to future generations. Alternate translation: [And … received territory as a lasting possession]
After the Israelites had conquered portions of the Promised Land and Joshua had grown old, the Lord directed him to divide the rest of the land among the tribes of Israel as their inheritance (Joshua 13-20). The eastern tribes had already been allotted their land under Moses’ leadership (Numbers 32), but they continued to help the other tribes drive out the Canaanites from land west of the Jordan River. The Lord also instructed the Israelites to designate several cities of refuge, where someone could flee for protection from an avenger if they accidentally killed someone (Numbers 35; Joshua 20).
Though Manasseh’s descendants formed only half the tribe of Joseph (the other half being Ephraim) and its population was surpassed by Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, and Asher (Numbers 26) at the time of their entry in Canaan, Manasseh occupied one of the largest allotments among the tribes of Israel, rivaling even the royal tribe of Judah. Half of Manasseh’s allotted territory was located technically outside the Promised Land of Canaan in the region commonly referred to as the Transjordan (“across the Jordan”), which was seized from King Og as the Israelites approached Canaan from the southeast and prepared to enter the land (Numbers 32:33; Deuteronomy 3:13; Joshua 13; see “Israel Defeats Og and Sihon” map). The other half of its territory (often referred to as West Manasseh) lay in the central region of the Promised Land, and the tribe of Manasseh, sometimes referred to by the name of Machir, Manasseh’s son, was involved in several key events in the early life of Israel. They participated in the victory of Deborah and Barak over Sisera (Judges 5:14; see “Deborah and Barak Defeat Sisera” map) as well as the victory of Gideon (who was from Manasseh) over the Midianites (Judges 7:23; see “Gideon Defeats the Midianites” map). After Gideon died, his son Abimelech briefly made himself king over Shechem and also attacked the town of Thebez in the territory of Manasseh (Judges 9). Manassites were among those who joined David before the battle at Mount Gilboa and also among those who came to make him king at Hebron (1 Chronicles 12; see “The Battle at Mount Gilboa” map and “David and Ish-bosheth” map). Many Manassites were also among those who humbled themselves and accepted Hezekiah’s invitation to attend the Passover in Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 30:11).
West Manasseh’s boundaries eventually stretched from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River, and that is how they are drawn on virtually all maps of the tribe’s territory. But this author is convinced that a careful reading of Joshua 16-17 (particularly Joshua 17:7-12) indicates that, technically speaking, Manasseh’s initial allotment included only the western portion of their full allotment, that is, the land to the west of Tappuah, Shechem, and En-gannim and to the south of Asher (see “Poster Map of the Tribe of Zebulun and Its Surroundings circa 1200 B.C.” map and its discussion regarding southern Asher), as shown on this map (see also 1 Kings 4:10). But the tribe of Joseph (that is, Manasseh and Ephraim) complained to Joshua that their allotted territory in Canaan was not large enough for their growing populations (Joshua 17:14-18). So Joshua responded: “If you are a numerous people, go up to the forest, and clear ground there for yourselves in the land of the Perizzites and the Rephaim” (Joshua 17:15). Then it appears that the tribe of Joseph complained further that even this additional hill country would not be enough, yet they were not confident that they could take land from the Canaanites in the Jezreel Valley (Joshua 17:16). But Joshua assured them, “Since you are so large and strong, you will be given more than one portion. The forests of the hill country will be yours as well. Clear as much of the land as you wish, and take possession of its farthest corners. And you will drive out the Canaanites from the valleys, too, even though they are strong and have iron chariots” (Joshua 17:17-18, NLT). This additional allotment–the forested hill country of the Perizzites and the Rephaim–was likely the mountainous region just north of Shechem and the surrounding towns of Tirzah, Thebez, and Bezek. This is supported by Jacob’s comment in Genesis 34:30 that Simeon and Levi had made him “odious to the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites and the Perizzites” when they slaughtered the men of Shechem for assaulting their sister. Judges 1:4-5 also references a battle fought against the Canaanites and the Perizzites at Bezek. Prior to the Israelites’ entry into Canaan, Perizzites apparently lived in the hill country near Bethel and Ai as well (Genesis 13:7). The Rephaim, while predominantly associated with the lands across the Jordan River (Genesis 14:5; Deuteronomy 2:11-20; 3:11-13), apparently also lived in Canaan, because the Israelites wiped out many Anakim, who were descendants of the Rephaim, as they were conquering Judah (Deuteronomy 2:11; Joshua 11:21-22; 14:12-15). It should also be noted that Ephraim was included in this promise of an additional lot as well (Joshua 17:17), and the stories of Gideon and Jephthah indicate that by their time Ephraim, not Manasseh, was progressively gaining control over the lower Jordan Valley as far north as Zaphon (Judges 7:23-24; 12:1). Manasseh also began to occupy territory belonging to the surrounding Israelite tribes, including the towns and surrounding villages of Beth-shan, Ibleam, Dor, Endor, Taanach, and Megiddo, though they never fully drove out the Canaanites living there (Joshua 17:11-12; Judges 1:27-28; 1 Chronicles 7:29). As a result, the territory occupied by Manasseh and Ephraim by the completion of the book of Joshua and Judges is notably larger than the land originally allotted to them.
Joshua also records that Manasseh’s tribal allotment was further divided among ten clans of Manasseh, including the families of the daughters of Zelophehad (Joshua 17:1-6). During the Israelites’ wandering in the wilderness, Moses granted Zelophehad’s daughters, whose father had no sons, the right to inherit land, though this was not the normal practice in Israel (Numbers 27). The discovery of the Samaria Ostraca in the palace of Ahab in 1910 has enabled scholars to deduce the likely area in which several of these clans settled within Manasseh’s territory, including Noah, Shemida, Abiezer, Asriel, Shechem, Helek, Hoglah, and Tirzah. This author also suspects that the location of the clan of Mahlah may be preserved in the name of the ruins at Khirbat al Milkh (identified as Abel-meholah on this map) and the nearby stream of Wadi el Maleh. Likewise, this author also suspects the location of the clan of Milcah may be preserved in name of the ruins at Khirbat Malihim and the nearby spring of `Ein el Ma`lqa.