InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEUT JOB YEHO (JOS) HERO (JDG) RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG YOEL (JOEL) MIC ISA ZEP HAB YIR (JER) LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBAD DAN EZEK EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL 2 PS WIS TOB MAN BAR G DAN G ESD L ESD ESG JDT 3 MAC SIR 1 MAC 2 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL LAOD PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
InterlinearVerse Num C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36
Num 26 V1 V4 V7 V10 V13 V16 V19 V22 V25 V28 V31 V34 V37 V40 V43 V46 V49 V52 V55 V58 V61 V64
People tagged in the matching LV passage: Hepher (NUM 26:32) · Hoglah · Mahlah · Milcah (daughter of Zelophehad) · Noah (daughter of Zelophehad) · Tirzah (NUM 26:33) · Zelophehad
OET-LV And_Tsəlofḩād/(Zelophehad) the_son_of Ḩēfer not they_belonged to_him/it sons if/because (if) daughters and_name_of the_daughters_of Tsəlofḩād was_Maḩlāh and_Noˊāh Ḩoglāh Milkāh and_Tirʦāh.
OET (OET-RV) Hefer’s son Tselofehad had no sons—only daughters named Mahlah, Noa, Hoglah, Milkah, and Tirtsah.
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / infostructure
וּצְלָפְחָ֣ד בֶּן־חֵ֗פֶר לֹא־הָ֥יוּ ל֛וֹ בָּנִ֖ים
and,Zelophehad son_of Ḩēfer not they_were to=him/it sons
If it would be more natural in your language, you may want to put the information about Zelophehad the son of Hepher with the information about there were not sons for him. Alternate translation: [And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons]
Note 2 topic: writing-participants
וּצְלָפְחָ֣ד בֶּן־חֵ֗פֶר
and,Zelophehad son_of Ḩēfer
Here the author is introducing Zelophehad the son of Hepher and his daughters as new participants in the story. Your language may have its own way of introducing new participants that you can use in your translation. Alternate translation: [Now as for a certain man named Zelophehad the son of Hepher]
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / explicit
לֹא הָ֥יוּ ל֛וֹ בָּנִ֖ים
not they_were to=him/it sons
The implication is that Zelophehad had no sons who could receive a share of the land after him. You could include this information if that would be helpful to your readers. Alternate translation: [there were no sons for him to inherit a share of the land]
Note 4 topic: grammar-collectivenouns
וְשֵׁם֙ בְּנ֣וֹת צְלָפְחָ֔ד
and=name_of daughters_of Tsəlāfəḩād/(Zelophehad)
In this verse, the word name is singular in form, but it refers to all five daughters of Zelophehad as a group. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use the plural form of “name.” Alternate translation: [the names of the daughters of Zelophehad]
Note 5 topic: translate-names
מַחְלָ֣ה וְנֹעָ֔ה חָגְלָ֥ה מִלְכָּ֖ה וְתִרְצָֽה
Maḩlāh and,Noah Ḩāgəlāh Milkah and,Tirzah
The words Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah are the names of women.
OET-LV And_Tsəlofḩād/(Zelophehad) the_son_of Ḩēfer not they_belonged to_him/it sons if/because (if) daughters and_name_of the_daughters_of Tsəlofḩād was_Maḩlāh and_Noˊāh Ḩoglāh Milkāh and_Tirʦāh.
OET (OET-RV) Hefer’s son Tselofehad had no sons—only daughters named Mahlah, Noa, Hoglah, Milkah, and Tirtsah.
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.