Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key

OETOET-RVOET-LVULTUSTBSBBLBAICNTOEBWEBBEWMBBNETLSVFBVTCNTT4TLEBBBEMoffJPSWymthASVDRAYLTDrbyRVWbstrKJB-1769KJB-1611BshpsGnvaCvdlTNTWyclSR-GNTUHBBrLXXBrTrRelatedTopics Parallel InterlinearReferenceDictionarySearch

parallelVerse INTGENEXOLEVNUMDEUJOBJOSJDGRUTH1SA2SAPSAAMOSHOS1KI2KI1CH2CHPROECCSNGJOELMICISAZEPHABJERLAMYNANAHOBADANEZEEZRAESTNEHHAGZECMALYHNMARKMATLUKEACTsYACGAL1TH2TH1COR2CORROMCOLPHMEPHPHP1TIMTIT1PET2PET2TIMHEBYUD1YHN2YHN3YHNREV

Exo IntroC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28C29C30C31C32C33C34C35C36C37C38C39C40

Exo 17 V1V2V3V4V5V6V7V8V9V10V11V12V14V15V16

Parallel EXO 17:13

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

BI Exo 17:13 ©

Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clearImportance=normal(All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV)So this was how Yehoshua defeated Amalek and his army with their swords.

OET-LVAnd_defeated Yəhōshūˊa DOM ˊAmālēq and_DOM people_his with_edge of_[the]_sword.

UHBוַ⁠יַּחֲלֹ֧שׁ יְהוֹשֻׁ֛עַ אֶת־עֲמָלֵ֥ק וְ⁠אֶת־עַמּ֖⁠וֹ לְ⁠פִי־חָֽרֶב׃פ
   (va⁠yyaḩₐlosh yəhōshuˊa ʼet-ˊₐmālēq və⁠ʼet-ˊamm⁠ō lə⁠fī-ḩāreⱱ.◊)

Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).

BrLXXΚαὶ ἐτρέψατο Ἰησοῦς τὸν Ἀμαλὴκ, καὶ πάντα τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ ἐν φόνῳ μαχαίρας.
   (Kai etrepsato Yaʸsous ton Amalaʸk, kai panta ton laon autou en fonōi maⱪairas. )

BrTrAnd Joshua routed Amalec and all his people with the slaughter of the sword.

ULTAnd Joshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

USTIn this way Joshua and the men with him defeated the Amalekite king and his army in battle.

BSB  § So Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his army with the sword.


OEBNo OEB EXO book available

WEBBEJoshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

WMBB (Same as above)

NETSo Joshua destroyed Amalek and his army with the sword.

LSVand Joshua weakens Amalek and his people by the mouth of the sword.

FBVAs a result Joshua defeated the Amalekite army.

T4TSo Joshua and the men with him completely defeated the Amalek people-group, using their swords to fight against them.

LEBAnd Joshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.[fn]


17:13 Literally “mouth of the sword”

BBEAnd Joshua overcame Amalek and his people with the sword.

MoffNo Moff EXO book available

JPSAnd Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

ASVAnd Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

DRAAnd Josue put Amalec and his people to flight, by the edge of the sword.

YLTand Joshua weakeneth Amalek and his people by the mouth of the sword.

DrbyAnd Joshua broke the power of Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

RVAnd Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

WbstrAnd Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

KJB-1769And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

KJB-1611And Ioshua discomfited Amalek, and his people, with the edge of the sword.
   (Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from punctuation)

BshpsAnd Iosua discomforted Amelec and his people with the edge of the sworde.
   (And Yoshua discomforted Amelec and his people with the edge of the sword.)

GnvaAnd Ioshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.
   (And Yoshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. )

CvdlAnd Iosua discomfited Amalek, & his people thorow the edge of the swerde.
   (And Yoshua discomfited Amalek, and his people through the edge of the sword.)

WyclAnd Josue droof a wey Amalech and his puple, in `the mouth of swerd, that is, bi the scharpnesse of the swerd.
   (And Yosue droof a wey Amalech and his people, in `the mouth of sword, that is, by the scharpnesse of the sword.)

LuthUnd Josua dämpfte den Amalek und sein Volk durch des Schwerts Schärfe.
   (And Yosua dämpfte the Amalek and his people through the Schwerts Schärfe.)

ClVgFugavitque Josue Amalec, et populum ejus in ore gladii.
   (Fugavitque Yosue Amalec, and the_people his in ore gladii. )


TSNTyndale Study Notes:

17:8-16 Israel was enabled to defeat the Amalekites only by God’s blessing and providential care.


UTNuW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy

לְ⁠פִי־חָֽרֶב

with,edge sword

The sword represents battle. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use an equivalent expression or plain language. Alternate translation: “in combat”


BMMBibleMapper.com Maps:

Map

Map

The Route of the Exodus

Exodus 13-19; Numbers 33

Like several other events recorded in Scripture, the Bible’s account of the Israelites’ journey from Egypt to Mount Sinai includes an abundance of geographical references, yet it remains one of the most hotly debated topics among scholars, and numerous theories have been offered. The vast majority of geographical references provided in the story are disputed, including the place where the Israelites crossed the Red Sea, the location of Mount Sinai (see Proposed Locations for Mount Sinai map), and the various stops along the Israelites’ journey. A few locations have been established with some degree of scholarly consensus, but even these are not without opposing viewpoints. Amidst this incredible diversity of opinion, however, a single verse provides one of the most helpful clues for weighing the merits of one viewpoint over another: “By the way of Mount Seir it takes eleven days to reach Kadesh-barnea from Horeb” (Deuteronomy 1:2). For those who assume the Bible’s account to be trustworthy, this verse appears to require the following for any theory to be considered viable: 1) Kadesh-barnea and Mount Sinai must have been located at a distance from each other that could reasonably have been expected to take eleven days for an entire nation of people with small children, flocks, equipment, and perhaps even elderly members to travel on foot; and 2) the pace established by this distance over eleven days should most likely be considered the typical pace for the Israelites as they traveled from place to place along the other parts of the journey. This two-pronged test clearly strains many of the theories put forth to this point, especially when one factors in the time references given for the start of the journey (Exodus 12:6; Numbers 33:3), the middle of the journey (Exodus 16:1; Numbers 33:8), and the end of the journey (Exodus 19:1). In short, the journey from Rameses to the Wilderness of Sin took 31 days, since it included the 15th day of the second month, and the rest of the journey took another 16 days, assuming they arrived at Mount Sinai on the 15th day (not the first day, etc.) of the third month. Along with these criteria, a theory’s overall congruence with other established geographical and archeological data should bolster its credibility over other proposals. Another consideration is the extreme similarity between the events at Rephidim (Exodus 17) and the events at Kadesh-barnea (Numbers 20:1-13; 27:12-14; Deuteronomy 32:51; Ezekiel 47:19; 48:28), raising the question of whether Rephidim (meaning “resting places”) is in fact Kadesh-barnea. With these things in mind, the map below proposes a route for the exodus that meets virtually all of these criteria. A careful analysis and explanation of all the elements of the map is far beyond the scope of this article, but a few key points should be noted. The term Red Sea, in addition to referring to what we now regard it, must have also applied to the interconnected lakes and marshlands that lay along what is now the Suez Canal. Also, the portion of the journey that passed through the wilderness for three days without water (Exodus 15:22; Numbers 33:8) may have been comprised of a partial first day, a full second day, and a partial third day, much like Jesus’ time in the tomb is reckoned as three days in Matthew 12:40. Most notably, Mount Sinai is placed on this map at Gebel Khashm et-Tarif, which is appropriately located near, but not in, Midian (Exodus 3:1; 18:5; Numbers 10:29-30). It is also located 89 miles from Kadesh-barnea (assuming Kadesh is at Tall al-Quderat), which establishes a reasonable pace of 7.6 miles (12.2 km) per day to travel between them in 11 days. This lines up well with several known sources of water along that route (e.g., `Ain Qedeis [Hazar-addar?], Tamilat Suwelima [Hor-haggiggad?], and the spring at Kuntillet al-Girafi [unknown ancient identification]). This general pace then synchronizes very well with the timetable and distances required by this map for the other parts of the journey. The distance from Rameses to the Wilderness of Sin (where it is located here) could be completed in under 26 days, leaving an acceptable buffer of about 5 days for the parting of the Red Sea and perhaps a slower pace through the Wilderness of Shur/Etham. The entire journey took about 60 days, and the journey from the Wilderness of Sin to Mount Sinai took about 29 days. This leaves an acceptable buffer of time to complete the rest of the journey (about 16 days of travel) with a very adequate two weeks of extra time for Jethro to visit Moses and the Israelites to do battle with the Amalekites (Exodus 17-18). It should be noted that this timetable generally assumes (but does not necessarily require) that travel continued on sabbath days, but Scripture does not make clear whether travel was prohibited as work prior to the giving of the law at Mount Sinai.

BI Exo 17:13 ©