Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key

OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Parallel Simple Interlinear Topics Reference Dictionary Search

InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT ESA WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV

Heb C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13

Heb 7 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28

OET interlinear HEB 7:20

◄ ← HEB 7:20 ↓ → ► ║ ≡ ©

SR Greek word order (including unused variant words in grey)

    1. Greek word
    2. Greek lemma
    3. OET-LV words
    4. OET-RV words
    5. Strongs
    6. Role/Morphology
    7. OET Gloss
    8. VLT Gloss
    9. CAPS codes
    10. Confidence
    11. OET tags
    12. OET word #
    1. Καί
    2. kai
    3. And
    4. -
    5. 25320
    6. C·······
    7. and
    8. and
    9. PS
    10. Y64
    11. 143107
    1. καθʼ
    2. kata
    3. to
    4. -
    5. 25960
    6. P·······
    7. to
    8. to
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143108
    1. ὅσον
    2. hosos
    3. as much as
    4. -
    5. 37450
    6. R····ANS
    7. as_much_as
    8. as_much_as
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143109
    1. οὒ
    2. ou
    3. not
    4. -
    5. 37560
    6. D·······
    7. not
    8. not
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143110
    1. χωρίς
    2. χōris
    3. apart from
    4. -
    5. 55650
    6. P·······
    7. apart_from
    8. apart_from
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143111
    1. ὁρκωμοσίας
    2. horkōmosia
    3. oath
    4. -
    5. 37280
    6. N····GFS
    7. oath
    8. oath
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143112
    1. εἰσίν
    2. eimi
    3. -
    4. -
    5. 15100
    6. VIPA3··P
    7. are
    8. are
    9. -
    10. -
    11. 143113
    1. ἱερεῖς
    2. iereus
    3. -
    4. -
    5. 24090
    6. N····NMP
    7. priests
    8. priests
    9. -
    10. -
    11. 143114
    1. οἱ
    2. ho
    3. the ones
    4. -
    5. 35880
    6. R····NMP
    7. the ‹ones›
    8. the ‹ones›
    9. -
    10. Y64; R142922
    11. 143115
    1. μέν
    2. men
    3. on one hand
    4. -
    5. 33030
    6. C·······
    7. on_one_hand
    8. on_one_hand
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143116
    1. γάρ
    2. gar
    3. for
    4. -
    5. 10630
    6. C·······
    7. for
    8. for
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143117
    1. χωρίς
    2. χōris
    3. without
    4. -
    5. 55650
    6. P·······
    7. without
    8. without
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143118
    1. ὁρκωμοσίας
    2. horkōmosia
    3. +an oath
    4. -
    5. 37280
    6. N····GFS
    7. ˓an˒ oath
    8. ˓an˒ oath
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143119
    1. εἰσίν
    2. eimi
    3. are
    4. -
    5. 15100
    6. VIPA3··P
    7. are
    8. are
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143120
    1. ἱερεῖς
    2. iereus
    3. priests
    4. priests
    5. 24090
    6. N····NMP
    7. priests
    8. priests
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143121
    1. γεγονότες
    2. ginomai
    3. having become
    4. become
    5. 10960
    6. VPEA·NMP
    7. ˓having˒ become
    8. ˓having˒ become
    9. -
    10. Y64
    11. 143122

OET (OET-LV) And to as_much_as not apart_from oath, the ones for on_one_hand without an_oath are priests having_become,

OET (OET-RV) And it wasn’t done without an oath, because although men become priests without an oath,

None
uW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: translate-versebridge

To help your readers understand the author’s main point in this verse and the next one, you could combine both verses into a verse bridge. You could put in a first sentence the background information about how the Israelite priests were not appointed with an oath, while Jesus was appointed with an oath. Then, you could put the comparison between how Jesus was appointed with an oath and how he is the guarantor of a better covenant in a second sentence. Alternate translation: [For indeed they, without swearing an oath, are become priests, but he with an oath-taking, through God saying to him, “The Lord swore and will not change his mind: ‘You are a priest forever.’” So, by as much as not without swearing an oath,]

Note 2 topic: grammar-connect-words-phrases

καθ’ ὅσον

to as_much_as

The phrase by as much as introduces the first half a comparison that the author will complete in [7:22](../07/22.md). The point is that, just as swearing an oath is more guaranteed than not using an oath, so Jesus’ priesthood and covenant are better than the priesthood of the descendants of Levi. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use a form that introduces a comparison between two situations or concepts. Alternate translation: [just as it was] or [in the same way that it was]

Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / doublenegatives

οὐ χωρὶς ὁρκωμοσίας

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Καί καθʼ ὅσον οὒ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας οἱ μέν γάρ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσίν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες)

The phrase not without swearing an oath uses two negative words to emphasize that there was definitely an oath involved. If it would be helpful in your language, you could express the meaning with positive words, emphasizing the importance of swearing an oath. Alternate translation: [with swearing an oath]

Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / explicit

οὐ χωρὶς ὁρκωμοσίας

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Καί καθʼ ὅσον οὒ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας οἱ μέν γάρ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσίν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες)

The author again refers to [Psalm 110:4](../../psa/110/004.md), which states that the Lord “swears” that “you are a priest forever.” The author quotes this psalm again in the following verse. If it would be helpful in your language, you could make the content of the oath explicit. Alternate translation: [not without swearing an oath about the priesthood of the Messiah]

Note 5 topic: figures-of-speech / infostructure

ὁρκωμοσίας, οἱ μὲν γὰρ χωρὶς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσὶν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες

oath the_‹ones› ˓an˒_oath (Some words not found in SR-GNT: Καί καθʼ ὅσον οὒ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας οἱ μέν γάρ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσίν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες)

The author begins a comment about the oath and priests. This comment continues to the end of [7:21](../07/21.md). The ULT has used em-dashes to make it clear that these words are extra information that explain not without swearing an oath. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use a form that indicates that the author is about to give extra explanatory information. If you do, make sure that you properly signal the end of this extra information at the end of [7:22](../07/22.md). Alternate translation: [swearing an oath—by the way, they indeed without swearing an oath are become priests]

Note 6 topic: grammar-connect-words-phrases

μὲν γὰρ

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Καί καθʼ ὅσον οὒ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας οἱ μέν γάρ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσίν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες)

The word for introduces an explanation of about why it is important that there was an oath. The word indeed signals to the audience that this explanation has two parts. The second part begins with “but” in [7:21a](../07/21.md). If it would be helpful in your language, you could use words that introduce a two-part explanation. Alternate translation: [now on the one hand]

Note 7 topic: writing-pronouns

οἱ

the_‹ones›

The word they refers to the priests who are descended from Levi, about whom God gave laws through Moses. If it would be helpful in your language, you could make explicit that the pronoun refers to Levitical priests. Alternate translation: [the Levitical priests] or [the Levites]

Note 8 topic: figures-of-speech / explicit

χωρὶς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσὶν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες

(Some words not found in SR-GNT: Καί καθʼ ὅσον οὒ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας οἱ μέν γάρ χωρίς ὁρκωμοσίας εἰσίν ἱερεῖς γεγονότες)

The author points out that God did not “swear” an oath when he appointed the descendants of Levi to be priests. Instead, he gave laws and regulations through Moses. If it would be helpful in your language, you could make this idea more explicit. Alternate translation: [are appointed priests by God without him swearing an oath]

OET-LV English word order (‘Reverse’ interlinear)

    1. OET-LV words
    2. OET-RV words
    3. Strongs
    4. Greek word
    5. Greek lemma
    6. Role/Morphology
    7. OET Gloss
    8. VLT Gloss
    9. CAPS codes
    10. Confidence
    11. OET tags
    12. OET word #
    1. And
    2. -
    3. 25320
    4. PS
    5. kai
    6. C-·······
    7. and
    8. and
    9. PS
    10. Y64
    11. 143107
    1. to
    2. -
    3. 25960
    4. kata
    5. P-·······
    6. to
    7. to
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143108
    1. as much as
    2. -
    3. 37450
    4. hosos
    5. R-····ANS
    6. as_much_as
    7. as_much_as
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143109
    1. not
    2. -
    3. 37560
    4. ou
    5. D-·······
    6. not
    7. not
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143110
    1. apart from
    2. -
    3. 55650
    4. χōris
    5. P-·······
    6. apart_from
    7. apart_from
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143111
    1. oath
    2. -
    3. 37280
    4. horkōmosia
    5. N-····GFS
    6. oath
    7. oath
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143112
    1. the ones
    2. -
    3. 35880
    4. ho
    5. R-····NMP
    6. the ‹ones›
    7. the ‹ones›
    8. -
    9. Y64; R142922
    10. 143115
    1. for
    2. -
    3. 10630
    4. gar
    5. C-·······
    6. for
    7. for
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143117
    1. on one hand
    2. -
    3. 33030
    4. men
    5. C-·······
    6. on_one_hand
    7. on_one_hand
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143116
    1. without
    2. -
    3. 55650
    4. χōris
    5. P-·······
    6. without
    7. without
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143118
    1. +an oath
    2. -
    3. 37280
    4. horkōmosia
    5. N-····GFS
    6. ˓an˒ oath
    7. ˓an˒ oath
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143119
    1. are
    2. -
    3. 15100
    4. eimi
    5. V-IPA3··P
    6. are
    7. are
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143120
    1. priests
    2. priests
    3. 24090
    4. iereus
    5. N-····NMP
    6. priests
    7. priests
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143121
    1. having become
    2. become
    3. 10960
    4. ginomai
    5. V-PEA·NMP
    6. ˓having˒ become
    7. ˓having˒ become
    8. -
    9. Y64
    10. 143122

OET (OET-LV) And to as_much_as not apart_from oath, the ones for on_one_hand without an_oath are priests having_become,

OET (OET-RV) And it wasn’t done without an oath, because although men become priests without an oath,

Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.

Acknowledgements: The SR Greek text, lemmas, morphology, and VLT gloss are all thanks to the CNTR.

OET logo mark

◄ ← HEB 7:20 ↑ → ► ║ ≡ ©