InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEUT JOB YEHO (JOS) HERO (JDG) RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG YOEL (JOEL) MIC ISA ZEP HAB YIR (JER) LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBAD DAN EZEK EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL 2 PS WIS TOB MAN BAR G DAN G ESD L ESD ESG JDT 3 MAC SIR 1 MAC 2 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL LAOD PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
InterlinearVerse Deu C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34
Deu 17 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V17 V18 V19 V20
People tagged in the matching LV passage: God
Places tagged in the matching LV passage: Egypt
OET-LV Only not he_will_increase for_him/it horses and_not he_will_make_return DOM the_people to_Miʦrayim/(Egypt) so_as to_increase horse[s] and_YHWH he_has_said to/for_you(pl) not you(pl)_will_repeat to_return on_way the_this again.
OET (OET-RV) However, he mustn’t acquire a large number of horses for himself, and he should never send people to Mitsrayim (Egypt) to buy horses, because Yahweh has told you all to never go back that way again.
Note 1 topic: grammar-connect-logic-contrast
רַק֮
only
Moses uses the word Only here to indicate a strong contrast between what is allowed and not allowed for Israel’s king. In your translation, indicate this strong contrast in a way that is natural in your language. Alternate translation: [But]
לְמַ֖עַן הַרְבּ֣וֹת ס֑וּס
to acquire_many horses
This could mean that the king must not (1) send people to Egypt to buy horses for him as is modeled in the UST, or (2) sell Israelites to the Egyptians in exchange for horses. Alternate translation: [in exchange for horses for him]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / quotesinquotes
וַֽיהוָה֙ אָמַ֣ר לָכֶ֔ם לֹ֣א תֹסִפ֗וּן לָשׁ֛וּב בַּדֶּ֥רֶךְ הַזֶּ֖ה עֽוֹד
and=YHWH he/it_had_said to/for=you(pl) not you(pl),will_repeat to,return (Some words not found in UHB: only not acquire_many for=him/it horses and=not cause_~_to_return DOM the,people to,Egypt to acquire_many horses and=YHWH he/it_had_said to/for=you(pl) not you(pl),will_repeat to,return on,way the=this again/more )
If it would be clearer in your language, you could translate this so that there is not a quotation within a quotation, as modeled by the UST.
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / explicitinfo
לֹ֣א תֹסִפ֗וּן לָשׁ֛וּב בַּדֶּ֥רֶךְ הַזֶּ֖ה עֽוֹד
not you(pl),will_repeat to,return (Some words not found in UHB: only not acquire_many for=him/it horses and=not cause_~_to_return DOM the,people to,Egypt to acquire_many horses and=YHWH he/it_had_said to/for=you(pl) not you(pl),will_repeat to,return on,way the=this again/more )
The expression no longer return that way again contains extra information that would be unnatural to express in some languages. If this is true of your language, you could shorten the expression. Alternate translation: [You will not return that way]
OET-LV Only not he_will_increase for_him/it horses and_not he_will_make_return DOM the_people to_Miʦrayim/(Egypt) so_as to_increase horse[s] and_YHWH he_has_said to/for_you(pl) not you(pl)_will_repeat to_return on_way the_this again.
OET (OET-RV) However, he mustn’t acquire a large number of horses for himself, and he should never send people to Mitsrayim (Egypt) to buy horses, because Yahweh has told you all to never go back that way again.
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.