Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
interlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1SA 2SA PSA AMOS HOS 1KI 2KI 1CH 2CH PRO ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL YHN MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC GAL 1TH 2TH 1COR 2COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1TIM TIT 1PET 2PET 2TIM HEB YUD 1YHN 2YHN 3YHN REV
1Sa C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31
1Sa 13 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V23
OET (OET-LV) And_it_was in/on_day battle and_not a_sword it_was_found and_spear in/on/at/with_hand_of all_of the_people which was_with Shāʼūl and_DOM Yōnātān/(Jonathan) and_had with_Shāʼūl and_with_Yōnātān his/its_son.
OET (OET-RV) So on the day of battle, Sha’ul and his son Yonatan had a sword and spear each, but none of the warriors with them had any.
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
בְּי֣וֹם מִלְחֶ֔מֶת
in/on=day battle
The author is using the term day by association to mean a specific time, the time of this conflict. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use an equivalent expression or plain language. Alternate translation: [at the time of this conflict]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / idiom
וְלֹ֨א נִמְצָ֜א חֶ֤רֶב וַחֲנִית֙ & וַתִּמָּצֵ֣א לְשָׁא֔וּל וּלְיוֹנָתָ֖ן בְּנֽוֹ
and=not he/it_was_found sword and,spear & and,had with,Saul and,with,Jonathan his/its=son
See how you translated the term found in [13:15](../13/15.md) and [13:19](../13/19.md). Alternate translation: [that there was no sword or spear … but Saul and his son Jonathan did have one]
Note 3 topic: grammar-collectivenouns
וְלֹ֨א נִמְצָ֜א חֶ֤רֶב וַחֲנִית֙ & וַתִּמָּצֵ֣א לְשָׁא֔וּל וּלְיוֹנָתָ֖ן בְּנֽוֹ
and=not he/it_was_found sword and,spear & and,had with,Saul and,with,Jonathan his/its=son
Since the author is referring to weapons in general, it might be more natural in your language to use plural forms. Alternate translation: [that there were no swords or spears … but Saul and his son Jonathan did have them]
Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
בְּיַ֣ד
in/on/at/with,hand_of
The author is using the term hand by association to mean possession or ownership. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use an equivalent expression or plain language. Alternate translation: [in the possession of]
13:19-22 no blacksmiths: The Philistines kept the Israelites unarmed by gaining a monopoly on the iron necessary to make weapons. Iron technology had not existed long in Canaan; it might have developed in the Aegean area, and metalworking skills were possibly introduced into Canaan through seafaring peoples, including the Philistines.
OET (OET-LV) And_it_was in/on_day battle and_not a_sword it_was_found and_spear in/on/at/with_hand_of all_of the_people which was_with Shāʼūl and_DOM Yōnātān/(Jonathan) and_had with_Shāʼūl and_with_Yōnātān his/its_son.
OET (OET-RV) So on the day of battle, Sha’ul and his son Yonatan had a sword and spear each, but none of the warriors with them had any.
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.