Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
ParallelVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT ESA WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
2 Ki Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25
2 Ki 3 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for Bible-translators and others doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still early looks into the drafted texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
This chapter describes how King Jehoram of Israel led an attack to reconquer Moab, a former vassal state that had rebelled against him, with the help of King Jehoshaphat of Judah and the king of Edom.
In 3:8, Jehoram asks Jehoshaphat what route their armies should take to reconquer Moab. Jehoshaphat replies that they should go through Edom. There were two main advantages to this route. First, while the northern route across the Jordan River was shorter, it led to a border of Moab that was heavily fortified. While the southern route through the desert was longer and more difficult and dangerous, it led to a border of Moab that was less defended. That made it a strategic route for a surprise attack that caught the Moabites unprepared. Second, this route led through Edom, allowing the two kings to pick up the king of Edom and his army as a further ally along the way, since Edom was a vassal state under Judah’s influence. This strengthened their army and ensured Edom’s loyalty during the campaign.
King Jehoram of Israel probably did not ask Elisha to accompany his army. Their relationship was strained and marked by mutual distrust. Jehoram was an idolatrous king who continued in the sinful ways of his father, Ahab. Elisha openly rebuked him for following false gods. However, Elisha, as Yahweh’s prophet, did not need to have the king’s approval or invitation to accompany the army. His authority came from Yahweh, and so he came and acted as a spiritual guide to the Israelite soldiers. In the end, his presence was necessary to bring Yahweh’s help to the campaign, including the miraculous provision of water in the desert. As a prophet, Elisha’s authority and purpose enabled him to join the military expedition and represent Yahweh.
In 3:15, when the kings ask him for direction from Yahweh, Elisha tells them to bring him a harpist. He probably wanted to listen to soft, beautiful music to help prepare his mind and spirit to receive Yahweh’s word clearly. This may have been especially helpful on this occasion, since Elisha had just sternly rebuked King Jehoram (3:13). Elisha may have become agitated, and he may have needed to still his thoughts and calm his emotions in order to hear a prophetic message from Yahweh.
In 3:26, the author says that as a final desperate tactic to escape the siege in Kir Hareseth, the king of Moab led 700 swordsmen to try to break through the enemy lines surrounding the city. The author says that he was specifically trying to reach the place where the Edomite army was. He may have done this because he believed the Edomite contingent was the weakest or most vulnerable part of the allied army that was attacking him. He may also have hoped that he could turn the Edomites against the Judeans and Israelites, since Edom was a vassal state of Judah that had rebelled against it in the past, just as he had now rebelled against Israel. However, his attempt was not successful.
In 3:27, the author says that after the Moabite king sacrificed his firstborn son publicly on the city wall, “great wrath was against Israel,” and the invading army abandoned its siege of Kir Haraseth and left Moab. Interpreters have suggested many different understandings of what this might mean. The following are some of the possibilities. However, since the meaning is so uncertain, we recommend that you leave this as a general statement in your translation. The UST models one way to do that.- The statement could mean that the Moabite king’s sacrifice of his firstborn son made the Moabite soldiers so angry with the Israelites that they fought very hard against them.- It could mean that the Judean and Edomite kings and their soldiers became angry with the Israelite king for starting a war against Moab that had led to such an outrage, so they refused to keep helping him.- It could mean that this sacrifice unleashed the evil forces that lie behind idol worship (as the Bible explains in places such as [1 Corinthians 10:20–21](../1co/10/20.md)) and, because the war against Moab had been instigated by Jehoram, who worshiped Baal, Yahweh would not help him and his allies overcome those forces (compare what Elisha says in [3:14](../03/14.md)).