Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
BrLXXΚαὶ ἐκοιμήθη Ὀζίας μετὰ τῶν πατέρων αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἔθαψαν αὐτὸν μετὰ τῶν πατέρων αὐτοῦ ἐν τῷ πεδίῳ τῆς ταφῆς τῶν βασιλέων, ὅτι εἶπαν ὅτι λεπρός ἐστι· καὶ ἐβασίλευσεν Ἰωάθαμ υἱὸς αὐτοῦ ἀντʼ αὐτοῦ. (Kai ekoimaʸthaʸ Ozias meta tōn paterōn autou, kai ethapsan auton meta tōn paterōn autou en tōi pediōi taʸs tafaʸs tōn basileōn, hoti eipan hoti lepros esti; kai ebasileusen Yōatham huios autou antʼ autou. )
BrTrAnd Ozias slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial place of the kings, for they said, He is a leper; and Joatham his son reigned in his stead.
ULTAnd Uzziah laid down with his fathers. And they buried him with his fathers in the field of the grave that belonged to the kings, for they said, “Leprous is he.” And Jotham his son became king in his place.
USTBecause Uzziah was a leper, when he died they would not bury him in the royal tombs. Instead, they buried him in a nearby cemetery that the kings owned. Then his son Jotham became the king of Judah.
BSBAnd Uzziah rested with his fathers and was buried near them [fn] in a field of burial that belonged to the kings; for the people said, “He was a leper.” And his son Jotham reigned in his place.
WEBBESo Uzziah slept with his fathers; and they buried him with his fathers in the field of burial which belonged to the kings, for they said, “He is a leper.” Jotham his son reigned in his place.
NETUzziah passed away and was buried near his ancestors in a cemetery belonging to the kings. (This was because he had a skin disease.) His son Jotham replaced him as king.
LSVand Uzziah lies with his fathers, and they bury him with his fathers in the field of the burying-place that the kings have, for they said, “He [is] a leper”; and his son Jotham reigns in his stead.
FBVUzziah died and was buried near them in a cemetery belonging to the kings, for people said, “He was a leper.” His son Jotham took over as king.
T4TBecause Uzziah was a leper, when he died, they would not bury him in the tombs where the other kings were buried. Instead, he was buried in a nearby cemetery that the kings owned. Then his son Jotham became the king of Judah.
LEBAnd Uzziah slept with his ancestors,[fn] and they buried him with his ancestors[fn] in the burial field which belonged to the kings, because, they said, “He was leprous.” And Jotham his son reigned in his place.
BBESo Uzziah went to rest with his fathers; and they put his body into the earth in the field used for the resting-place of the kings, for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son became king in his place.
JPSSo Uzziah slept with his fathers; and they buried him with his fathers in the field of burial which belonged to the kings; for they said: 'He is a leper'; and Jotham his son reigned in his stead.
ASVSo Uzziah slept with his fathers; and they buried him with his fathers in the field of burial which belonged to the kings; for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son reigned in his stead.
DRAAnd Ozias slept with his fathers, and they buried him in the field of the royal sepulchres, because he was a leper: and Joatham his son reigned in his stead.
YLTand Uzziah lieth with his fathers, and they bury him with his fathers, in the field of the burying-place that the kings have, for they said, 'He [is] a leper;' and reign doth Jotham his son in his stead.
DrbyAnd Uzziah slept with his fathers; and they buried him with his fathers in the burial-ground of the kings, for they said, He is a leper. And Jotham his son reigned in his stead.
RVSo Uzziah slept with his fathers; and they buried him with his fathers in the field of burial which belonged to the kings; for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son reigned in his stead.
WbstrSo Uzziah slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial which belonged to the kings; for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son reigned in his stead.
KJB-1769So Uzziah slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial which belonged to the kings; for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son reigned in his stead. (So Uzziah slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial which belonged to the kings; for they said, He is a leper: and Jotham his son reignd in his stead. )
KJB-1611So Uzziah slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the buriall which belonged to the kings: for they saide, He is a leper: And Iotham his sonne reigned in his stead. (Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from capitalisation and punctuation)
BshpsAnd so Uzzia slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the fielde of the buriall which was beside the sepulchres of the kinges: for they saide, he is a leper: And Iotham his sonne raigned in his steade. (And so Uzzia slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial which was beside the sepulchres of the kings: for they said, he is a leper: And Yotham his son reignd in his stead.)
GnvaSo Vzziah slept with his fathers, and they buryed him with his fathers in the fielde of the burial, which perteined to the kings: for they said, He is a leper. And Iotham his sonne reigned in his steade. (So Vzziah slept with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the burial, which pertained to the kings: for they said, He is a leper. And Yotham his son reignd in his stead. )
CvdlAnd Osias fell on slepe wt his fathers, and they buryed him with his fathers in the pece of grounde beside ye kynges sepulcres: for they sayde: He is leporous. And Iotham his sonne was kynge in his steade. (And Osias fell on sleep with his fathers, and they buried him with his fathers in the piece of ground beside ye/you_all kings sepulcres: for they said: He is leporous. And Yotham his son was king in his stead.)
WyclAnd Ozie slepte with hise fadris, and thei birieden not hym in the feeld of the kyngis sepulcris, for he was leprouse; and Joathan, his sone, regnyde for hym. (And Ozie slept with his fathers, and they buried not him in the field of the kings sepulcris, for he was leprouse; and Yoathan, his son, reignd for him.)
LuthUnd Usia entschlief mit seinen Vätern, und sie begruben ihn bei seinen Vätern im Acker bei dem Begräbnis der Könige; denn sie sprachen: Er ist aussätzig. Und Jotham, sein Sohn, ward König an seiner Statt. (And Usia entschlief with his Vätern, and they/she/them buried him/it at his Vätern in_the Acker at to_him Begräbnis the/of_the kings/king; because they/she/them said: He is aussätzig. And Yotham, his son, what/which king at his Statt.)
ClVgDormivitque Ozias cum patribus suis, et sepelierunt eum in agro regalium sepulchrorum, eo quod esset leprosus: regnavitque Joatham filius ejus pro eo.[fn] (Dormivitque Ozias when/with patribus to_his_own, and they_buried him in agro regalium sepulchrorum, eo that was leprosus: reignedque Yoatham son his for by_him. )
26.23In agro regalium sepulcrorum. Non in regalibus sepulturis, non in civitate David. Hæretici enim atque schismatici indigni sunt societate et communione sanctæ Ecclesiæ, nec memoria eorum inter catholicos habetur: quia erroribus maculati, et vitiis squalidi ab eorum consortio separantur.
26.23In agro regalium sepulcrorum. Non in regalibus sepulturis, not/no in civitate David. Hæretici because atque schismatici indigni are societate and communione sanctæ Ecclesiæ, but_not memoria their between catholicos habetur: because erroribus maculati, and vitiis squalidi away their consortio separantur.
(Some words not found in UHB: and,slept ˊUzziyyāh with fathers,his and,buried DOM=him/it with fathers,his in/on/at/with,field the,burial which/who belonged_to_the,kings that/for/because/then/when said leprous he/it and,became_king Yōtām/(Jotham) his/its=son in_~_place,his )
This is polite way to say that he died. Alternate translation: “So Uzziah died”
(Occurrence 0) they buried him with his ancestors
(Some words not found in UHB: and,slept ˊUzziyyāh with fathers,his and,buried DOM=him/it with fathers,his in/on/at/with,field the,burial which/who belonged_to_the,kings that/for/because/then/when said leprous he/it and,became_king Yōtām/(Jotham) his/its=son in_~_place,his )
Alternate translation: “the people buried him near his ancestors” or “they buried him where his ancestors were buried”
(Occurrence 0) Jotham, his son, became king in his place
(Some words not found in UHB: and,slept ˊUzziyyāh with fathers,his and,buried DOM=him/it with fathers,his in/on/at/with,field the,burial which/who belonged_to_the,kings that/for/because/then/when said leprous he/it and,became_king Yōtām/(Jotham) his/its=son in_~_place,his )
Alternate translation: “Jotham, his son, became king after Uzziah”
The long, concurrent reigns of Jeroboam II of Israel and Uzziah (also called Azariah) of Judah marked a period of resurgence after their nations had suffered nearly sixty years of decline and unrest. By the time both kings ascended to the throne in 793 B.C. and 792 B.C., Moab had revolted from Israel and seized land belonging to the tribe of Reuben (2 Kings 1:1; see “The Nation of Moab and the Tribe of Reuben”), and Edom and Libnah had revolted from Judah (2 Kings 8:16-24; 2 Chronicles 21:1-11; see “Edom and Libnah Revolt”). Jehu then brutally overthrew Ahab’s dynasty, but he later suffered the loss of all Gilead to the rising power of Aram (2 Kings 1:1; 3:1-27; 8:12; 10:32-33; 2 Chronicles 21:8-10; see “Aram Captures Gilead”). Soon after this, however, the Assyrian king Adad-nirari III (who may be the “savior” of 2 Kings 13:5) attacked Aram, but then he withdrew, thus creating a power vacuum to the north. Jeroboam of Israel took advantage of this opportunity and captured much of Aram, though it is unclear how firmly he held Aram or for how long. During this same time, king Uzziah of Judah captured the Red Sea port city of Elath in the far south, which belonged to Edom, and he also attacked the Arabs of Gur, who were likely located nearby. He also attacked the Meunites who lived in Seir, the formerly Edomite region south of the Judean Negev, though the Meunites themselves do not appear to have been Edomites. The Meunites are probably the same as the “Maonites” mentioned in Judges 10:12, and they also joined the Moabite alliance that attacked king Jehoshaphat of Judah (2 Chronicles 20). About a century after Uzziah’s time, during the reign of Hezekiah, some Simeonites attacked some Meunites in the Negev and seized their land (1 Chronicles 4:41-43). According to the Septuagint, the Meunites also paid Uzziah tribute (2 Chronicles 26:7-8), and Uzziah likely captured some of the Meunites and gave them as servants for the Temple of the Lord, which appears to have been a common practice in Israel since the time of Moses and Joshua (see Numbers 31:30; Joshua 9:27; Ezra 8:20). Their descendants are listed among the “Nethinim,” who served at the Temple during time of Ezra and Nehemiah (Ezra 2:50; Nehemiah 7:52). Uzziah also attacked the Philistine cities of Gath, Ashdod, and Jabneh and established other cities throughout Philistia. He built towers in Jerusalem at the Corner Gate, the Valley Gate, and the Angle as well as towers in the wilderness. He also dug many cisterns to store water for his large herds, both in the Shephelah (the foothills near Gath) and in the plain. He also had large farms and vineyards and strengthened Judah’s army. As far as moral leadership, the writer of Kings deems Jeroboam as a bad king for allowing idolatry to continue in Israel, but Uzziah is deemed as good, though he later sinned and was afflicted with leprosy for making an offering on the altar of incense.
