InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEUT JOB YEHO (JOS) HERO (JDG) RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG YOEL (JOEL) MIC ISA ZEP HAB YIR (JER) LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBAD DAN EZEK EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL 2 PS WIS TOB MAN BAR G DAN G ESD L ESD ESG JDT 3 MAC SIR 1 MAC 2 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL LAOD PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
InterlinearVerse 2 Ki C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25
2 Ki 18 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V28 V29 V30 V31 V32 V33 V34 V35 V36 V37
OET-LV And_he/it_said to the_Rab-_of shaqeh to master(s)_of_your and_to_you(ms) has_he_sent_me my_master to_speak DOM the_words/messages the_these not to the_men who_are_sitting on the_wall to_eat DOM[fn] mmm[fn] and_to_drink DOM mmm[fn][fn][fn] with_you(pl).
18:27 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
18:27 OSHB variant note: חרי/הם: (x-qere) ’צוֹאָתָ֗/ם’: lemma=6675 n=0.0.1 morph=HNcfsc/Sp3mp id=1247T צוֹאָתָ֗/ם
18:27 OSHB variant note: שיני/הם: (x-qere) ’מימֵ֥י’: lemma=4325 morph=HNcmpc id=12cPo מימֵ֥י ’רַגְלֵי/הֶ֖ם’: lemma=7272 n=0.0 morph=HNcfdc/Sp3mp id=12HCo רַגְלֵי/הֶ֖ם
18:27 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
18:27 OSHB note: Marks an anomalous form.
OET (OET-RV) “Ha ha, do you think my master sent this message just to you three and your king?” he replied. “No, don’t you think that this message is also for the hungry people sitting on the wall who’ll soon have to eat their own dung and drink their own urine along with you?”
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / rquestion
הַעַ֨ל אֲדֹנֶ֤יךָ וְאֵלֶ֨יךָ֙ שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲדֹנִ֔י לְדַבֵּ֖ר אֶת־הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה הֲלֹ֣א עַל־הָאֲנָשִׁ֗ים הַיֹּֽשְׁבִים֙ עַל־הַ֣חֹמָ֔ה לֶאֱכֹ֣ל אֶת חריהם וְלִשְׁתּ֛וֹת אֶת־שיניהם עִמָּכֶֽם
?,to master(s)_of,your and=to=you(ms) (Some words not found in UHB: and=he/it_said to, great//chief/captain שָׁקֵה ?,to master(s)_of,your and=to=you(ms) has,he_sent_me my=master to,speak DOM the,words the=these ?,not on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,men [who,are]_sitting on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,wall to,eat DOM חרי,הם and,to,drink DOM שיני,הם with,you(pl) )
The Rabshakeh is using the question form for emphasis. If a speaker of your language would not use the question form for that purpose, you could translate this as a statement or as an exclamation. Alternate translation: [My master did not send me to speak these words only to your master and to you! He also sent me to speak them to the men sitting on the wall, who will eat their dung and drink their urine with you!]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
אֶת־הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה
DOM DOM DOM (Some words not found in UHB: and=he/it_said to, great//chief/captain שָׁקֵה ?,to master(s)_of,your and=to=you(ms) has,he_sent_me my=master to,speak DOM the,words the=these ?,not on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,men [who,are]_sitting on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,wall to,eat DOM חרי,הם and,to,drink DOM שיני,הם with,you(pl) )
See how you translated the similar expression in 1:7. Alternate translation: [this message]
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / yousingular
הַעַ֨ל אֲדֹנֶ֤יךָ וְאֵלֶ֨יךָ֙ & עִמָּכֶֽם
?,to master(s)_of,your and=to=you(ms) & (Some words not found in UHB: and=he/it_said to, great//chief/captain שָׁקֵה ?,to master(s)_of,your and=to=you(ms) has,he_sent_me my=master to,speak DOM the,words the=these ?,not on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,men [who,are]_sitting on/upon/above/on_account_of//he/it_went_in the,wall to,eat DOM חרי,הם and,to,drink DOM שיני,הם with,you(pl) )
Even though the author says that the Rabshakeh spoke to them, the word your and the word you in its first instance are singular because the Rabshakeh is replying directly to Eliakim, who spoke on behalf of all three Judean officials. The word you in its second instance is plural because the Rabshakeh is including Shebnah and Joah in what he says will happen. Use the appropriate singular and plural forms in your translation if your language marks that distinction.
OET-LV And_he/it_said to the_Rab-_of shaqeh to master(s)_of_your and_to_you(ms) has_he_sent_me my_master to_speak DOM the_words/messages the_these not to the_men who_are_sitting on the_wall to_eat DOM[fn] mmm[fn] and_to_drink DOM mmm[fn][fn][fn] with_you(pl).
18:27 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
18:27 OSHB variant note: חרי/הם: (x-qere) ’צוֹאָתָ֗/ם’: lemma=6675 n=0.0.1 morph=HNcfsc/Sp3mp id=1247T צוֹאָתָ֗/ם
18:27 OSHB variant note: שיני/הם: (x-qere) ’מימֵ֥י’: lemma=4325 morph=HNcmpc id=12cPo מימֵ֥י ’רַגְלֵי/הֶ֖ם’: lemma=7272 n=0.0 morph=HNcfdc/Sp3mp id=12HCo רַגְלֵי/הֶ֖ם
18:27 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
18:27 OSHB note: Marks an anomalous form.
OET (OET-RV) “Ha ha, do you think my master sent this message just to you three and your king?” he replied. “No, don’t you think that this message is also for the hungry people sitting on the wall who’ll soon have to eat their own dung and drink their own urine along with you?”
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.