Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT ESA WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
2 Sam C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24
2 Sam 20 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26
OET (OET-LV) and_there a_man_of he_was_met worthlessness and_his/its_name was_Sheⱱaˊ the_son_of Bicri a_man a_Jaminite and_he_gave_a_blast on_trumpet and_he/it_said there_is_not to/for_us a_portion in_Dāvid and_not an_inheritance to/for_us in_the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) everyone to_tents_of_his Oh_Yisrāʼēl/(Israel).
OET (OET-RV) Now there was a good-for-nothing Benyaminite man named Sheva who was Bikri’s son, and he blasted on the trumpet, then said,
⇔ “We have no interest in David,
⇔ ≈ and no claim in Yishay’s son.
⇔ Go home every man from Yisrael.”
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / idiom
וְשָׁ֨ם נִקְרָ֜א אִ֣ישׁ בְּלִיַּ֗עַל
(Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
See how you translated the similar expression in [18:9](../18/09.md). Alternate translation: [And a man of wickedness happened to be there]
Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / abstractnouns
אִ֣ישׁ בְּלִיַּ֗עַל
(a)_man (a)_man (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea of wickedness, you could express the same idea in another way. Alternate translation: [a wicked man]
Note 3 topic: writing-participants
וּשְׁמ֛וֹ שֶׁ֥בַע בֶּן־בִּכְרִ֖י אִ֣ישׁ יְמִינִ֑י
(Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
Here the author is introducing Sheba, the son of Bichri, a man of Benjamin as a new participant in the story. Your language may have its own way of introducing new participants that you can use in your translation.
Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / exclusive
אֵֽין־לָ֨נוּ חֵ֜לֶק בְּדָוִ֗ד וְלֹ֤א נַֽחֲלָה־לָ֨נוּ֙ בְּבֶן־יִשַׁ֔י
not to/for=us portion (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
If Sheba were speaking to the Judeans with whom he and his fellow Israelites have been disputing, the word us would not include them, so it would be appropriate to use the exclusive form of that word if your language marks that distinction. That is one interpretive possibility. However, since he directly addresses his fellow Israelites in the next sentence, he may well also be addressing them here, in which case it would be appropriate to use the inclusive form. Decide as a translation team which interpretation you wish to follow.
Note 5 topic: figures-of-speech / parallelism
אֵֽין־לָ֨נוּ חֵ֜לֶק בְּדָוִ֗ד וְלֹ֤א נַֽחֲלָה־לָ֨נוּ֙ בְּבֶן־יִשַׁ֔י
not to/for=us portion (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
These two phrases There is no portion to us in David and no inheritance is to us in the son of Jesse mean basically the same thing. The second emphasizes the meaning of the first by repeating the same idea with different words. If it would be helpful to your readers, you could combine them and express the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: [We will have no part of David son of Jesse]
Note 6 topic: figures-of-speech / metaphor
אֵֽין־לָ֨נוּ חֵ֜לֶק בְּדָוִ֗ד וְלֹ֤א נַֽחֲלָה־לָ֨נוּ֙ בְּבֶן־יִשַׁ֔י
not to/for=us portion (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
Sheba is speaking as if David were actually land or property of which the Israelites could have a portion that they would receive as an inheritance. If it would be helpful in your language, you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: [We want nothing to do with David son of Jesse]
Note 7 topic: figures-of-speech / synecdoche
אִ֥ישׁ לְאֹהָלָ֖יו יִשְׂרָאֵֽל
(a)_man to,tents_of,his (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
Sheba is using a man to his tent as a common expression of his culture that often described soldiers stopping a military campaign altogether and each one going back to his home and family. In this particular context, Sheba is using the expression to mean that the soldiers from the other tribes will not obey David as their military commander. If this phrase does not have that meaning in your language, you could use a comparable expression from your language that does have that meaning, or you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: [Abandon the army and go home, Israel!]
Note 8 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy
אִ֣ישׁ & אִ֥ישׁ לְאֹהָלָ֖יו יִשְׂרָאֵֽל
(a)_man & (a)_man to,tents_of,his (Some words not found in UHB: and=there happened_to_be (a)_man worthless and=his/its=name seven son_of Bikrī (a)_man Jamite and,he_gave_a_blast on,trumpet and=he/it_said not to/for=us portion in,David and=not inheritance to/for=us in,the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) (a)_man to,tents_of,his Yisrael )
Here, tents represents homes or dwelling places. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use an equivalent expression or plain language. Alternate translation: [Each of you return to his own home, you Israelites]
OET (OET-LV) and_there a_man_of he_was_met worthlessness and_his/its_name was_Sheⱱaˊ the_son_of Bicri a_man a_Jaminite and_he_gave_a_blast on_trumpet and_he/it_said there_is_not to/for_us a_portion in_Dāvid and_not an_inheritance to/for_us in_the_son_of Yishay/(Jesse) everyone to_tents_of_his Oh_Yisrāʼēl/(Israel).
OET (OET-RV) Now there was a good-for-nothing Benyaminite man named Sheva who was Bikri’s son, and he blasted on the trumpet, then said,
⇔ “We have no interest in David,
⇔ ≈ and no claim in Yishay’s son.
⇔ Go home every man from Yisrael.”
Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.
Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.