Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
parallelVerse INT GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOS JDG RUTH 1SA 2SA PSA AMOS HOS 1KI 2KI 1CH 2CH PRO ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL JOB YHN MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC GAL 1TH 2TH 1COR 2COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1TIM TIT 1PET 2PET 2TIM HEB YUD 1YHN 2YHN 3YHN REV
2Ch Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36
2Ch 25 V1 V2 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance=normal (All still tentative.)
OET-LV And_he/it_was just_as it_was_secure the_kingdom on/upon/above_him/it and_killed DOM servants_his the_killed DOM the_king his/its_father.
UHB וַיְהִ֕י כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר חָזְקָ֥ה הַמַּמְלָכָ֖ה עָלָ֑יו וַֽיַּהֲרֹג֙ אֶת־עֲבָדָ֔יו הַמַּכִּ֖ים אֶת־הַמֶּ֥לֶךְ אָבִֽיו׃ ‡
(vayəhiy kaʼₐsher ḩāzəqāh hammamlākāh ˊālāyv vayyahₐrog ʼet-ˊₐⱱādāyv hammakkim ʼet-hammelek ʼāⱱiyv.)
Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
BrLXX Καὶ ἐγένετο ὡς κατέστη ἡ βασιλεία ἐν χειρὶ αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἐθανάτωσε τοὺς παῖδας αὐτοῦ τοὺς φονεύσαντας τὸυ βασιλέα πατέρα αὐτοῦ·
(Kai egeneto hōs katestaʸ haʸ basileia en ⱪeiri autou, kai ethanatōse tous paidas autou tous foneusantas tou basilea patera autou; )
BrTr And it came to pass, when the kingdom was established in his hand, that he slew his servants who had slain the king his father.
ULT And it happended when the kingdom was strong upon him, then he killed his servants, the ones who struck down the king, his father.
UST As soon as he was in complete control of his kingdom, he caused others to execute the officials who had murdered his father.
BSB § As soon as the kingdom was firmly in his grasp, Amaziah executed the servants who had murdered his father the king.
OEB No OEB 2CH book available
WEBBE Now when the kingdom was established to him, he killed his servants who had killed his father the king.
WMBB (Same as above)
NET When he had secured control of the kingdom, he executed the servants who had assassinated his father.
LSV And it comes to pass, when the kingdom has been strong on him, that he slays his servants, those striking his father the king,
FBV After he had made sure his rule was secure, he executed the officers who had murdered his father the king.
T4T As soon as he was in complete control of his kingdom, he caused to be executed the officials who had murdered his father.
LEB And it happened that as his reign was strengthened, he killed his servants who had killed his father the king.
BBE Now when he became strong in the kingdom, he put to death those men who had taken the life of the king his father.
Moff No Moff 2CH book available
JPS Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established unto him, that he slew his servants who had killed the king his father.
ASV Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established unto him, that he slew his servants that had killed the king his father.
DRA And when he saw himself strengthened in his kingdom, he put to death the servants that had slain the king his father.
YLT And it cometh to pass, when the kingdom hath been strong upon him, that he slayeth his servants, those smiting the king his father,
Drby And it came to pass when the kingdom was established unto him, that he killed his servants who had smitten the king his father.
RV Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established unto him, that he slew his servants which had killed the king his father.
Wbstr Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established to him, that he slew his servants that had killed the king his father.
KJB-1769 ¶ Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established to him, that he slew his servants that had killed the king his father.[fn]
(¶ Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established to him, that he slew/killed his servants that had killed the king his father. )
25.3 established…: Heb. confirmed upon him
KJB-1611 ¶ [fn]Now it came to passe when the kingdome was established to him, that he slew his seruants, that had killed the king his father.
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from punctuation and footnotes)
25:3 Heb. confirmed vpon him.
Bshps And assoone as he was setled in the kingdome, he slue his seruauntes that had killed the king his father.
(And as soon as he was settled in the kingdom, he slew/killed his servants that had killed the king his father.)
Gnva And when the kingdome was established vnto him, he slewe his seruants, that had slaine the King his father.
(And when the kingdom was established unto him, he slew/killed his servants, that had slain/killed the King his father. )
Cvdl Now whan his kingdome was in stregth, he slewe his seruautes which had slayne the kinge his father.
(Now when his kingdom was in stregth, he slew/killed his servants which had slain/killed the king his father.)
Wycl And whanne he siy the empire strengthid to hym silf, he stranglide the seruauntis, that killiden the kyng, his fadir;
(And when he saw the empire strengthened to himself, he strangled the servants, that killed the king, his father;)
Luth Da nun sein Königreich bekräftiget war, erwürgete er seine Knechte, die den König, seinen Vater, geschlagen hatten.
(So now his kingreich bekräftiget was, stranglede he his servant(s), the the king, his Vater, geschlagen hatten.)
ClVg Cumque roboratum sibi videret imperium, jugulavit servos qui occiderant regem patrem suum,
(Cumque roboratum sibi videret government, yugulavit servos who occiderant regem patrem his_own, )
25:3-4 Amaziah . . . executed the officials to avenge his father and carry out the justice prescribed in the Law.
(Occurrence 0) It came about that
(Some words not found in UHB: and=he/it_was just=as firmly the,kingdom on/upon/above=him/it and,killed DOM servants,his the,killed DOM the=king his/its=father )
This phrase is used here to mark the beginning of a new part of the story. If your language has a way for doing this, you could consider using it here.
While the location of Mount Sinai is arguably the most significant unresolved debate remaining in Bible geography, it is this author’s estimation that the borders of Edom and Seir (also called “Mount Seir” and “the highlands of Seir”) have actually led to a greater amount of confusion regarding where related events took place. This confusion stems primarily from a key misunderstanding widely held about Edom and Seir: that Seir was located either solely or primarily on the eastern side of the Arabah (the low valley dividing virtually all of Israel from northern end of the Jordan River to the city of Elath on the Red Sea). But this author is convinced that, prior to the later Old Testament, all biblical references to Seir regard it as a sub-region within the greater area of Edom, and it was located on the western side of the Arabah. To be clear, the biblical accounts consistently affirm that the nation of Edom (the descendants of Esau) occupied the eastern side of the Arabah and even had their own rulers before the Israelites had kings (Genesis 36), as shown on this map. But this area is not typically what is intended when the biblical writers use the term Seir. (A nearly exhaustive list of references to Seir as a geographical term includes: Genesis 14:6; 32-33; 36; Numbers 24:18; Deuteronomy 1:2, 44; 2:1-12, 22-29; 33:2; Joshua 11:17; 12:7; 24:4; Judges 5:4; 1 Chronicles 1:38; 4:42; 2 Chronicles 20:10-23; 25:11-14; Isaiah 21:11; Ezekiel 35:2-15.) Also, it should be noted that the assumption that Seir was located east of the Arabah is at least as old as the writings of Josephus (Ant., IV, iv, 7) immediately after the New Testament, for he seems to assume this. Yet, Josephus’s overall reliability regarding the location of the events of the wilderness wanderings (and thus Seir) is called into question by his misidentification of Mount Hor with Jebel Nebi Harun (see “The Israelites’ Journeys in the Wilderness” map), so it is very possible he was also mistaken about Seir. Similarly, though it is commonly concluded that the term Seir can be found in the name ash-Sharat, it should be noted that the Arabic term for the eastern mountains of Edom was likely applied to the region several hundred years after the close of the Old Testament era and the time of Josephus, so it is possible that the term Seir had long since shifted to the eastern mountains by this time. Also, while archeological data confirms that eastern Edom was populated with a settled civilization before western Edom, this data likely would not accurately reflect habitation by semi-nomadic peoples such as Esau and his earlier descendants, whose settlements would have been largely temporary and unlikely to be recovered. In terms of biblical evidence, however, several verses support and even seem to require that Seir be located on the western side of the Arabah (Deuteronomy 2:1; Joshua 12:7; 1 Chronicles 4:42-43; see also Joshua 15:1) and also that Seir was only a sub-region within the larger Edomite nation (Ezekiel 35:15). And while some verses seem ambiguous regarding the location of Seir, none of them offer compelling testimony that it should be located east of the Arabah. A few passages (for example, 2 Chronicles 25; Ezekiel 35 [though see v. 15]) seem at times to use the term Seir to refer to all of Edom, but they never use it to refer only to eastern Edom. Instead, they appear to use the term in a similar way that the biblical writers sometimes symbolically use the term Ephraim to refer to all the northern Israelite tribes (Isaiah 7-11; Jeremiah 31; Hosea 5-14; Zechariah 9-10), though it was widely understood that Ephraim only occupied a specific portion of tribal territory within the land of Israel. If the borders of Seir, however, are relocated west of the Arabah, as shown here at the time of Joshua’s allotment of Canaan, several related stories in the Bible make better sense. For example, the journeys of Jacob and Esau as they meet each other and part once again make the best sense if Esau was arriving from a location on the west side of the Jordan River (Genesis 32-33; also see “Jacob Returns to Canaan” and “Jacob Travels to Southern Canaan” maps). Likewise it is easiest to envision the Israelites skirting the land of Seir after turning back from Kadesh (Deuteronomy 2:1; see “The Israelites’ Journeys in the Wilderness” map) if Seir was located west of the Arabah. Joshua’s description of Judah’s southern border also makes the most sense if Seir (and thus Edom) was located west of the Arabah (Joshua 15:1). In the time of Hezekiah, a western location for Seir makes it easiest to envision a company of 500 Simeonites exterminating a remnant of Amalekites there and settling in their place (1 Chronicles 4:42-43; see “Hezekiah Strengthens Judah” map). Finally, the prophet Ezekiel cursed the Edomites for encroaching far north of Judah’s southern border after the Babylonians ravaged the land (Ezekiel 35), and this is easiest to envision if the Edomites already occupied land immediately south of Judah. And by way of extrapolation, if it is to be assumed that the Horites, who formerly inhabited Seir (Deuteronomy 2:12), took their name from Mount Hor or that Mount Hor was named after them, then it is likely that this peak where Aaron died was located somewhere within the region of Seir as it is shown here (see “The Israelites’ Journeys in the Wilderness” map).