JOB 10:4 Parallel Verse View

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance=normal (All still tentative.)

Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).

BrLXX Ἢ ὥσπερ βροτὸς ὁρᾷ, καθορᾷς; ἢ καθὼς ὁρᾷ ἄνθρωπος, βλέψῃ;
(Aʸ hōsper brotos hora, kathoras; aʸ kathōs hora anthrōpos, blepsaʸ; )

ULT Are eyes of flesh to you?
⇔ If you see according to the seeing of a man?

UST Certainly you know and understand more than what people can see with their eyes! So you should understand my true motives and know that I am innocent.

OEB Hast Thou then eyes of flesh?
⇔ Or seest Thou as man seeth?

WEBBE Do you have eyes of flesh?
⇔ Or do you see as man sees?

WMBB (Same as above)

NET “Do you have eyes of flesh,
⇔ or do you see as a human being sees?

LSV Do you have eyes of flesh? Do You see as man sees?

FBV Do you have human eyes? Do you see like human beings do?

T4T Do you understand things the way that we humans do?

LEB • [fn] Or[fn]

10:? Literally “Are eyes of flesh for you”

10:? Literally “as seeing of human beings you see”

BBE Have you eyes of flesh, or do you see as man sees?

Moff No Moff JOB book available

JPS Hast Thou eyes of flesh? or seest Thou as man seeth?

ASV Hast thou eyes of flesh?
⇔ Or seest thou as man seeth?

DRA Hast thou eyes of flesh: or, shalt thou see as man seeth?

YLT Eyes of flesh hast Thou? As man seeth — seest Thou?

Drby Hast thou eyes of flesh? or seest thou as man seeth?

RV Hast thou eyes of flesh, or seest thou as man seeth?

Wbstr Hast thou eyes of flesh? or seest thou as man seeth?

KJB-1769 Hast thou eyes of flesh? or seest thou as man seeth?
(Hast thou/you eyes of flesh? or seest thou/you as man seeth? )

KJB-1611 Hast thou eyes of flesh? or seest thou as man seeth?
(Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above)

Bshps Hast thou fleshy eyes? or doest thou loke as a man loketh?
(Hast thou/you fleshy eyes? or doest thou/you look as a man looketh/looks?)

Gnva Hast thou carnall eyes? or doest thou see as man seeth?
(Hast thou/you carnal eyes? or doest thou/you see as man seeth? )

Cvdl Hast thou fle?shy eyes then, or doest thou loke as man loketh?
(Hast thou/you fle?shy eyes then, or doest thou/you look as man looketh/looks?)

Wycl Whethir fleischli iyen ben to thee, ethir, as a man seeth, also thou schalt se?
(Whethir fleshly eyes been to thee/you, ethir, as a man seeth, also thou/you shalt se?)

Luth Hast du denn auch fleischliche Augen, oder siehest du, wie ein Mensch siehet?
(Hast you because also fleischliche Augen, or siehest you, like a person siehet?)

ClVg Numquid oculi carnei tibi sunt? aut sicut videt homo, et tu videbis?[fn]
(Numquid oculi carnei to_you sunt? aut like videt homo, and you videbis? )

10.4 Nunquid oculi carnei. Oculi carnis non nisi aliqua facta in tempore agnoscunt, quia et cum tempore clauduntur, et humanus visus quodlibet opus sequitur, non præcurrit.

10.4 Nunquid oculi carnei. Oculi carnis not/no nisi aliqua facts in tempore agnoscunt, because and when/with tempore clauduntur, and humanus visus quodlibet opus follows, not/no præcurrit.

UTN uW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy

הַ⁠עֵינֵ֣י בָשָׂ֣ר לָ֑⁠ךְ אִם־כִּ⁠רְא֖וֹת אֱנ֣וֹשׁ תִּרְאֶֽה

?,eyes flesh/meat to/for=you(fs) if as,sees ʼEnōshh see

Job is using the terms eyes and seeing to mean by association knowing and understanding, since people often discover things by seeing them. If it would be helpful in your language, you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: “Do you only know and understand the kinds of things that people can see with their eyes”

Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / rquestion

הַ⁠עֵינֵ֣י בָשָׂ֣ר לָ֑⁠ךְ אִם־כִּ⁠רְא֖וֹת אֱנ֣וֹשׁ תִּרְאֶֽה

?,eyes flesh/meat to/for=you(fs) if as,sees ʼEnōshh see

Job is using the question form for emphasis. If you would not use the question form for that purpose in your language, you could translate these questions as statements or as exclamations. Alternate translation: “You do not have eyes of flesh! You do not see according to the seeing of a man!”

Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy

הַ⁠עֵינֵ֣י בָשָׂ֣ר לָ֑⁠ךְ

?,eyes flesh/meat to/for=you(fs)

Job is using the expression of flesh to mean “human,” by association with the way that humans have flesh. If it would be helpful in your language, you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: “Do you have human eyes?” or “You do not have human eyes!”

Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / idiom

אִם־כִּ⁠רְא֖וֹת אֱנ֣וֹשׁ תִּרְאֶֽה

if as,sees ʼEnōshh see

Job is using the word If to introduce a question that anticipates a negative answer. If it would be helpful to your readers, you could indicate this in your translation. Alternate translation: “You do not see as people see, do you?”

Note 5 topic: figures-of-speech / gendernotations

כִּ⁠רְא֖וֹת אֱנ֣וֹשׁ

as,sees ʼEnōshh

Here the masculine term man has a generic sense that includes both men and women. If it would be helpful to your readers, you could use language in your translation that is clearly inclusive of both men and women. Alternate translation: “as people do”

Parallel JOB 10:4