Parallel 1SA 17:50

---

OEB So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone and struck down the Philistine, killing him, although there was no sword in David’s hand.

WEBBE So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David’s hand.

WMBB (Same as above)

NET David prevailed over the Philistine with just the sling and the stone. He struck down the Philistine and killed him. David did not even have a sword in his hand.

LSV And David is stronger than the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and strikes the Philistine, and puts him to death, and there is no sword in the hand of David,

FBV This is how David defeated the Philistine with just a sling and a stone; with no sword in his hand David knocked the Philistine down and killed him.

T4T Then David ran and stood over Goliath. He pulled Goliath’s sword from its sheath and killed him with it, and then cut off his head. In that way David defeated the Philistine without having his own sword. He used only a sling and a stone!
¶ When the other Philistines saw that their great warrior was dead, they ran away.

LEB So David prevailed over the Philistine with the sling and with the stone, and he struck down the Philistine and killed him, but there was no sword in David’s hand.

BBE So David overcame the Philistine with his leather band and a stone, wounding the Philistine and causing his death: but David had no sword in his hand.

Moff No Moff 1SA book available

JPS So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.

ASV So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.

DRA And David prevailed over the Philistine, with a sling and a stone, and he struck, and slew the Philistine. And as David had no sword in his hand,

YLT And David is stronger than the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smiteth the Philistine, and putteth him to death, and there is no sword in the hand of David,

Drby So David overcame the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and smote the Philistine and killed him; and there was no sword in the hand of David.

RV So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.

Wbstr So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.

KJB-1769 So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.
   (So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew/killed him; but there was no sword in the hand of David. )

KJB-1611 [fn]So Dauid preuailed ouer the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him, but there was no sword in the hande of Dauid.
   (So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew/killed him, but there was no sword in the hand of David.)

---

Bshps And so Dauid ouercame the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and smote the Philistine, & slue him, euen when Dauid had no sword in his hand.
   (And so David ouercame the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew/killed him, even when David had no sword in his hand.)

Gnva So Dauid ouercame the Philistim with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistim, and slew him, when Dauid had no sword in his hand.
   (So David ouercame the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew/killed him, when David had no sword in his hand. )

Cvdl So Dauid ouercame ye Philistyne with the slynge and with ye stone, and smote him, and slewe him. And for so moch as Dauid had no swerde in his hande,
   (So David ouercame ye/you_all Philistine with the sling and with ye/you_all stone, and smote him, and slew/killed him. And for so much as David had no sword in his hand,)

Wyc And Dauid hadde the maistrie ayens `the Filistei `in a slyng and stoon, and he killide `the Filistei smytun. And whanne Dauid hadde no swerd in the hond,
   (And David had the maistrie against `the Philistine `in a sling and stone, and he killed `the Philistine smytun. And when David had no sword in the hand,)

Luth Also überwand David den Philister mit der Schleuder und mit dem Stein; und schlug ihn und tötete ihn. Und da David kein Schwert in seiner Hand hatte,
   (So überwand David the Philistines with the/of_the Schleuder and with to_him Stein; and hit/beat him/it and tötete ihn. And there David kein sword in his hand had,)

ClVg Prævaluitque David adversum Philisthæum in funda et lapide, percussumque Philisthæum interfecit. Cumque gladium non haberet in manu David,
   (Prævaluitque David adversum Philisthæum in funda and lapide, percussumque Philisthæum interfecit. Cumque gladium not/no haberet in by_hand David, )