Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key

OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Parallel Simple Interlinear Topics Reference Dictionary Search

InterlinearVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT ESA WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV

Job C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42

Job 15 V1 V2 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V30 V31 V32 V33 V34 V35

OET interlinear JOB 15:3

◄ ← JOB 15:3 ↓ → ► ║ ≡ ©

Hebrew word order

    1. Hebrew word
    2. Hebrew lemma
    3. OET-LV words
    4. OET-RV words
    5. Strongs
    6. Role/Morphology
    7. Gloss
    8. CAPS codes
    9. OET tags
    10. OET word #
    1. הוֹכֵחַ
    2. 340530
    3. Does he argue
    4. argue
    5. 3198
    6. V-Vha
    7. does_he_argue?
    8. S
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235897
    1. בְּ,דָבָר
    2. 340531,340532
    3. with a message
    4. talk
    5. 1697
    6. S-R,Ncmsa
    7. with,a_word
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235898
    1. לֹא
    2. 340533
    3. which not
    4. that
    5. 3808
    6. S-Tn
    7. [which]_not
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235899
    1. יִסְכּוֹן
    2. 340534
    3. it is of use
    4. -
    5. 5532
    6. V-Vqi3ms
    7. it_is_of_use
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235900
    1. וּ,מִלִּים
    2. 340535,340536
    3. and words/messages
    4. words
    5. 4405
    6. S-C,Ncfpa
    7. and,words
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235901
    1. לֹא
    2. 340537
    3. which not
    4. -
    5. 3808
    6. S-Tn
    7. [which]_not
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235902
    1. 340538
    2. -
    3. -
    4. -x-maqqef
    5. -
    6. -
    7. 235903
    1. יוֹעִיל
    2. 340539
    3. anyone profits
    4. -
    5. 3276
    6. V-Vhi3ms
    7. anyone_profits
    8. -
    9. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    10. 235904
    1. בָּ,ם
    2. 340540,340541
    3. by them
    4. -
    5. S-R,Sp3mp
    6. by,them
    7. -
    8. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    9. 235905
    1. 340542
    2. -
    3. -
    4. -x-sof-pasuq
    5. -
    6. -
    7. 235906

OET (OET-LV) Does_he_argue with_a_message which_not it_is_of_use and_words/messages which_not anyone_profits by_them.

OET (OET-RV) Should a person argue against useless talk,
 ⇔ ≈ or against words that have no value?

None
uW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / rquestion

הוֹכֵ֣חַ בְּ֭⁠דָבָר לֹ֣א יִסְכּ֑וֹן וּ֝⁠מִלִּ֗ים לֹא־יוֹעִ֥יל בָּֽ⁠ם

argue (Some words not found in UHB: argue with,a_word not profitable and,words not do_~_good by,them )

Eliphaz is using the question form for emphasis. If you would not use the question form for that purpose in your language, you could translate this as a statement or as an exclamation. This verse is the continuation of a question that began in the previous verse, but it may be helpful to make it a separate sentence in your translation. Alternate translation: [No, a wise person does not reason with a word that does not benefit or with words that do not have profit in them!]

Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy

הוֹכֵ֣חַ בְּ֭⁠דָבָר לֹ֣א יִסְכּ֑וֹן וּ֝⁠מִלִּ֗ים לֹא־יוֹעִ֥יל בָּֽ⁠ם

argue (Some words not found in UHB: argue with,a_word not profitable and,words not do_~_good by,them )

Eliphaz is using the terms word and words to mean what Job has been saying by using words. If it would be helpful in your language, you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: [reasoning by saying things that do not benefit and by making statements that do not have profit in them]

OET-LV English word order (‘Reverse’ interlinear)

    1. OET-LV words
    2. OET-RV words
    3. Strongs
    4. Hebrew word
    5. Hebrew lemma
    6. Role/Morphology
    7. Gloss
    8. CAPS codes
    9. OET tags
    10. OET word #
    1. Does he argue
    2. argue
    3. 3230
    4. 340530
    5. V-Vha
    6. S
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235897
    1. with a message
    2. talk
    3. 846,1726
    4. 340531,340532
    5. S-R,Ncmsa
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235898
    1. which not
    2. that
    3. 3835
    4. 340533
    5. S-Tn
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235899
    1. it is of use
    2. -
    3. 5435
    4. 340534
    5. V-Vqi3ms
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235900
    1. and words/messages
    2. words
    3. 1987,4118
    4. 340535,340536
    5. S-C,Ncfpa
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235901
    1. which not
    2. -
    3. 3835
    4. 340537
    5. S-Tn
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235902
    1. anyone profits
    2. -
    3. 3260
    4. 340539
    5. V-Vhi3ms
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235904
    1. by them
    2. -
    3. 846,1978
    4. 340540,340541
    5. S-R,Sp3mp
    6. -
    7. Y-1520; TJob's_Trial
    8. 235905

OET (OET-LV) Does_he_argue with_a_message which_not it_is_of_use and_words/messages which_not anyone_profits by_them.

OET (OET-RV) Should a person argue against useless talk,
 ⇔ ≈ or against words that have no value?

Note: The OET-RV is still only a first draft, and so far only a few words have been (mostly automatically) matched to the Hebrew or Greek words that they’re translated from.

Acknowledgements: The Hebrew text, lemmas, and morphology are all thanks to the OSHB and some of the glosses are from Macula Hebrew.OET logo mark

◄ ← JOB 15:3 ↑ → ► ║ ≡ ©