MAT 1:6 Parallel Verse View

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

Text critical issues=small word differences Clarity of original=clear Importance=normal (All still tentative.)

Key: khaki:verbs, light-green:nominative/subject, orange:accusative/object, pink:genitive/possessor.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).

ULT and Jesse fathered David the king, and David fathered Solomon by the wife of Uriah,

UST Jesse was the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon. Solomon’s mother was Bathsheba, who had been Uriah’s wife.

BSB and Jesse the father of David the king.
§ Next:
⇔ David was the father of Solomon by Uriah’s wife,

BLB and Jesse begat David the king. Next: David begat Solomon, out of the wife of Uriah,

AICNT Jesse fathered David the king. David [[the king]][fn] fathered Solomon by the wife of Uriah,

1:6, the king: Some manuscripts include. C(04) W(032) BYZ TR ‖ Absent from 𝔓1 ℵ(01) B(03) NA28 SBLGNT THGNT

OEB Jesse of David the King. David was the father of Solomon, whose mother was Uriah’s widow,

WEBBE Jesse became the father of King David. David the king[fn] became the father of Solomon by her who had been Uriah’s wife.

1:6 NU omits “the king”.

WMBB (Same as above including footnotes)

NET and Jesse the father of David the king.
¶ David was the father of Solomon (by the wife of Uriah ),

LSV and Jesse begot David the king. And David the king begot Solomon, of her [who had been] Uriah’s,

FBV and Jesse the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon (his mother had been Uriah's wife);

TCNT and Jesse was the father of David the king.
¶ David [fn]the king was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah,

1:6 the king ¦ — CT

T4T Jesse was the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon. Solomon’s mother was previously married to Uriah.

LEB and Jesse became the father of David the king.And David became the father of Solomon by the wife[fn] of Uriah,

1:6 *The word “wife” is not in the Greek text, but is implied idiomatically

BBE And the son of Jesse was David the king; and the son of David was Solomon by her who had been the wife of Uriah;

Moff No Moff MAT book available

Wymth Jesse of David—the King. David (by Uriah's widow) was the father of Solomon;

ASV and Jesse begat David the king.
¶ And David begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Uriah;

DRA And Jesse begot David the king. And David the king begot Solomon, of her that had been the wife of Urias.

YLT and Jesse begat David the king. And David the king begat Solomon, of her [who had been] Uriah's,

Drby and Jesse begat David the king. And David begat Solomon, of her [that had been the wife] of Urias;

RV and Jesse begat David the king. And David begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Uriah;

Wbstr And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Uriah;

KJB-1769 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;

KJB-1611 [fn]And [fn]Iesse begate Dauid the King, & Dauid the King begat Solomon of her that had bin the wife of Urias.
(And Yesse begat David the King, and David the King begat Solomon of her that had bin the wife of Urias.)

1:6 2. Sam. 12. 24.

1:6 1. Sam. 16. 1. and 17. 12.

Bshps Iesse begat Dauid the kyng, Dauid the kyng begat Solomon, of her that was the wyfe of Urie.
(Yesse begat David the king, David the king begat Solomon, of her that was the wife of Urie.)

Gnva And Iesse begate Dauid the King. And Dauid the King begate Salomon of her that was the wife of Vrias.
(And Yesse begat David the King. And David the King begat Salomon of her that was the wife of Vrias. )

Cvdl Iesse begat Dauid the kynge: Dauid the kynge begat Salomon, of her that was the wyfe of Vry:
(Yesse begat David the kynge: David the king begat Salomon, of her that was the wife of Vry:)

TNT Iesse begat Dauid the kynge: Dauid the kynge begat Salomon of her that was the wyfe of Ury:
(Yesse begat David the kynge: David the king begat Salomon of her that was the wife of Ury: )

Wycl Dauid the king bigat Salamon, of hir that was Vries wijf.
(David the king begat Salamon, of her that was Vries wife.)

Luth Jesse zeugete den König David. Der König David zeugete Salomo von dem Weibe des Uria.
(Yesse zeugete the king David. The king David zeugete Salomo from to_him Weibe the Uria.)

ClVg David autem rex genuit Salomonem ex ea quæ fuit Uriæ.[fn]
(David however king genuit Salomonem from ea which fuit Uriæ. )

1.6 David autem rex. Mystice David, id est Christus qui Goliam, id est diabolum superavit. Ipse est manu fortis, vel visu desiderabilis. De eodem dicitur: Dominus fortis et potens Psal. 23., etc. Et iterum: Speciosus forma præ filiis hominum Ibid. 44.. Uriæ. Uria, lux mea Dei scilicet, id est, diabolus, qui dixit: Similis ero Altissimo Isa. 14.: cui Ecclesiam conjugatam Christus de solario paternæ majestatis adamavit, et pulchram factam sibi matrimonio copulavit. Urias qui est figura diaboli, lux mea Deus interpretatur, qui adhuc transformat se in angelum lucis, et lucem Dei se facit.

1.6 David however rex. Mystice David, id it_is Christus who Goliam, id it_is diabolum superavit. Exactly_that it_is by_hand fortis, or visu desiderabilis. De eodem it_is_said: Master fortis and potens Psal. 23., etc. And again: Speciosus forma præ childrens of_men Ibid. 44.. Uriæ. Uria, light mea of_God scilicet, id it_is, diabolus, who dixit: Similis ero Altissimo Isa. 14.: cui Ecclesiam conyugatam Christus about solario paternæ mayestatis adamavit, and pulchram factam sibi matrimonio copulavit. Urias who it_is figura diaboli, lux mea God interpretatur, who adhuc transformat se in a_messenger/angel lucis, and the_light of_God se facit.

UGNT Ἰεσσαὶ δὲ ἐγέννησεν τὸν Δαυεὶδ τὸν βασιλέα.
¶  Δαυεὶδ δὲ ἐγέννησεν τὸν Σολομῶνα ἐκ τῆς τοῦ Οὐρίου,
(Yessai de egennaʸsen ton Daueid ton basilea.
¶  Daueid de egennaʸsen ton Solomōna ek taʸs tou Ouriou,)

SBL-GNT Ἰεσσαὶ δὲ ἐγέννησεν τὸν Δαυὶδ τὸν βασιλέα. Δαυὶδ ⸀δὲ ἐγέννησεν τὸν Σολομῶνα ἐκ τῆς τοῦ Οὐρίου,
(Yessai de egennaʸsen ton Dawid ton basilea. Dawid ⸀de egennaʸsen ton Solomōna ek taʸs tou Ouriou,)

TC-GNT Ἰεσσαὶ δὲ ἐγέννησε τὸν [fn]Δαυὶδ τὸν βασιλέα.
¶ [fn]Δαυὶδ δὲ [fn]ὁ βασιλεὺς ἐγέννησε τὸν [fn]Σολομῶνα ἐκ τῆς τοῦ Οὐρίου·
(Yessai de egennaʸse ton Dawid ton basilea.
¶ Dawid de ho basileus egennaʸse ton Solomōna ek taʸs tou Ouriou; )

1:6 δαυιδ ¦ δαβιδ HF TR ¦ δαυειδ TH WH

1:6 ο βασιλευς ¦ — CT

1:6 σολομωνα ¦ σολομωντα TR

Key for above GNTs: yellow:punctuation differs, red:words differ (from our SR-GNT base).

TTN Tyndale Theme Notes:

Genealogy of Jesus

Both Matthew and Luke provide genealogies of Jesus (Matt 1:1-17; Luke 3:23-38). The two genealogies differ for the generations following King David. Matthew follows the line of David’s son Solomon, while Luke follows the line of David’s son Nathan. One possible explanation is that Matthew records Joseph’s genealogy while Luke records Mary’s (in which case Joseph would have been Heli’s son-in-law).

Genealogies were kept quite accurately in Judaism, as Josephus confirms (Josephus, Life 1). Genealogies were important in the Old Testament and in Judaism generally because land rights were apportioned to families in Israel and because certain offices, such as priest and king, were inherited from father to son. Genealogies sometimes ran a record from the past to the present to illustrate religious themes, family descent, or political ties, as well as simple chronology (1 Chr 1–9). Most such lists were representative rather than a complete list of every individual.

The purpose of Matthew’s genealogy, unlike Luke’s, is to show Jesus’ heritage as running from Abraham through David. Jesus’ genealogy confirms him as a legitimate heir to the throne of David. So Jesus’ genealogy in Matthew goes back to Abraham, the father of the Jewish race. By contrast, the genealogy in Luke goes all the way back to Adam. This is consistent with Luke’s emphasis on Jesus as the Savior for all people everywhere.

In Matthew’s genealogy, the unusual mention of women with stained reputations (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba), some of them Gentiles, is noteworthy and emphasizes God’s grace to redeem even those deemed unworthy by others.

Jesus’ genealogies do not prove that Jesus is the Messiah, but they do make him a possible candidate. His identity as the Messiah becomes evident in other ways (Matt 11:2-6). God had guided the course of history to its climax. Jesus is the anticipated Messiah of the Old Testament, the Savior of his people, and the King descended from David assuming his throne (see 2 Sam 7:16). He is heir to Abraham and ultimately fulfills God’s promises to Abraham (Gen 12:1-3).

Passages for Further Study

Gen 12:1-3; 2 Sam 7:16; Matt 1:1-17; Luke 3:23-38

Parallel MAT 1:6