Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB BLB AICNT OEB WEB WMB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE MOF JPS ASV DRA YLT DBY RV WBS KJB-1769 KJB-1611 BB GNV CB TNT WYC SR-GNT UHB Related Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
parallelVerse INT GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOS JDG RUTH 1SA 2SA 1KI 2KI 1CH 2CH EZRA NEH EST JOB PSA PRO ECC SNG ISA JER LAM EZE DAN HOS JOEL AMOS OBA YNA MIC NAH HAB ZEP HAG ZEC MAL YHN MARK MAT LUKE ACTs ROM 1COR 2COR GAL EPH PHP COL 1TH 2TH 1TIM 2TIM TIT PHM HEB YAC 1PET 2PET 1YHN 2YHN 3YHN YUD REV
Job Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42
Job 9 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V30 V31 V33 V34 V35
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. This view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
OET (OET-RV) He’s not a human like me,
⇔ so we wouldn’t be going into court together.
OET-LV If/because not [he_is]_a_human like_me answer_him we_will_come together in/on/at/with_court.
UHB כִּי־לֹא־אִ֣ישׁ כָּמֹ֣נִי אֶֽעֱנֶ֑נּוּ נָב֥וֹא יַ֝חְדָּ֗ו בַּמִּשְׁפָּֽט׃ ‡
(kī-loʼ-ʼish kāmonī ʼeˊₑnennū nāⱱōʼ yaḩdāv bammishpāţ.)
Key: khaki:verbs, red:negative.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
ULT For I would not be answering a man like me,
⇔ we would not be coming together into judgment.
UST God is not a human, as I am,
⇔ so I could not refute him to prove that I am innocent
⇔ if we went together to have a trial in a courtroom.
BSB ⇔ For He is not a man like me, that I can answer Him,
⇔ that we can take each other to court.
OEB Thou art not a man like myself,
⇔ That we come into judgment together.
WEB For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him,
⇔ that we should come together in judgment.
WMB (Same as above)
NET For he is not a human being like I am,
⇔ that I might answer him,
⇔ that we might come together in judgment.
LSV But if a man like myself—I answer Him,
We come together into judgment.
FBV For God is not a mortal being like me, I can't defend myself or take him to court.
T4T ⇔ “God is not a human, as I am,
⇔ so there is no way that I could answer him to prove that I am innocent
⇔ if we went together to have a trial in a courtroom.
LEB • [fn] he is not a mortal like me that I can answer him, that[fn]
?:? Or the emphatic “Indeed”
?:? Literally “we come together in the justice,” or “we come together in the judgment”
BBE For he is not a man as I am, that I might give him an answer, that we might come together before a judge.
MOF No MOF JOB book available
JPS For He is not a man, as I am, that I should answer Him, that we should come together in judgment.
ASV For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him,
⇔ That we should come together in judgment.
DRA For I shall not answer a man that is like myself: nor one that may be heard with me equally in judgment.
YLT But if a man like myself — I answer him, We come together into judgment.
DBY For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him; that we should come together in judgment.
RV For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him, that we should come together in judgment.
WBS For he is not a man, as I am , that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgment.
KJB-1769 For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgment.
KJB-1611 For he is not a man as I am, that I should answere him, and we should come together in iudgement.
(For he is not a man as I am, that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgement.)
BB For he that I must geue aunswere vnto, and with whom I go to the lawe, is not a man as I am:
(For he that I must give answer unto, and with whom I go to the law, is not a man as I am:)
GNV For he is not a man as I am, that I shoulde answere him, if we come together to iudgement.
(For he is not a man as I am, that I should answer him, if we come together to judgement. )
CB For he yt I must geue answere vnto, and with whom I go to lawe, is not a man as I am.
(For he it I must give answer unto, and with whom I go to law, is not a man as I am.)
WYC Trewli Y schal not answere a man, which is lijk me; nether that may be herd euenli with me in doom.
(Trewli I shall not answer a man, which is like me; neither that may be heard euenli with me in doom.)
LUT Denn er ist nicht meinesgleichen, dem ich antworten möchte, daß wir vor Gericht miteinander kämen.
(Because he is not meinesgleichen, to_him I antworten möchte, that wir before/in_front_of Gericht miteinander kämen.)
CLV Neque enim viro qui similis mei est, respondebo; nec qui mecum in judicio ex æquo possit audiri.[fn]
(Neque because to_the_man who similis my/mine it_is, respondebo; but_not who with_me in yudicio from æquo possit audiri. )
9.32 Neque enim viso. Inter homines, et audimus objecta, et ad ea respondemus et audimur; sed in judicio Dei, ipse nos audit, quia videt omnia quæ agimus, sed non audimus eum, quia quod ei displicet plene non intelligimus. Non ex æquo potest audiri.
9.32 Neque because viso. Inter homines, and audimus obyecta, and to ea respondemus and audimur; but in yudicio God, himself we audit, because videt everything which agimus, but not/no audimus him, because that to_him displicet plene not/no intelligimus. Non from æquo potest audiri.
BRN For thou art not man like me, with whom I could contend, that we might come together to judgment.
BrLXX Οὐ γὰρ εἰ ἄνθρωπος κατʼ ἐμὲ, ᾧ ἀντικρινοῦμαι, ἵνα ἔλθωμεν ὁμοθυμαδὸν εἰς κρίσιν.
(Ou gar ei anthrōpos katʼ eme, hō antikrinoumai, hina elthōmen homothumadon eis krisin. )
9:1-35 Job responded to Bildad by describing God’s cosmic and judicial power. His speech sounds like a complicated legal case, with a summons and response (9:3, 14-16, 19b, 32), the possibility of self-incrimination (9:20), an arbiter (9:33-34), an accusatory question (9:12), a legal sentence (9:22), and a declaration of guilt (9:28-30).