Open Bible Data Home About News OET Key
OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
ParallelVerse GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA (JNA) NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL LAO GES LES ESG DNG 2 PS TOB JDT WIS SIR BAR LJE PAZ SUS BEL MAN 1 MAC 2 MAC 3 MAC 4 MAC YHN (JHN) MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC (JAM) GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD (JUD) 1 YHN (1 JHN) 2 YHN (2 JHN) 3 YHN (3 JHN) REV
Prov Intro C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31
Prov 30 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20 V21 V22 V23 V24 V25 V26 V27 V28 V29 V30 V31 V32 V33
Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible—click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed as a tool for doing comparisons of different translations—the older translations are further down the page (so you can read up from the bottom to trace the English translation history). The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible—please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Text critical issues=none Clarity of original=clear Importance to us=normal (All still tentative.)
OET (OET-RV) The leech has two daughters: Give! Give!”
¶ There are three, maybe four, things that are never satisfied—
⇔ ≈ four that never have enough:![]()
OET-LV belong_to_a_leech two_of daughters give give three_things they not they_are_satisfied four_things not they_say enough.
![]()
UHB לַֽעֲלוּקָ֨ה ׀ שְׁתֵּ֥י בָנוֹת֮ הַ֤ב ׀ הַ֥ב שָׁל֣וֹשׁ הֵ֭נָּה לֹ֣א תִשְׂבַּ֑עְנָה אַ֝רְבַּ֗ע לֹא־אָ֥מְרוּ הֽוֹן׃ ‡
(laˊₐlūqāh shəttēy ⱱānōt haⱱ haⱱ shālōsh hēnnāh loʼ tisbaˊnāh ʼarbaˊ loʼ-ʼāmərū hōn.)
Key: khaki:verbs, red:negative.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
BrLXX No BrLXX PROV 30:15 verse available
BrTr No BrTr PROV 30:15 verse available
ULT Two daughters are to the leech, ‘Give! Give!’
⇔ There are three, they are not satisfied;
⇔ four, they do not say, ‘Enough:’
UST Greedy people are like the offspring of leeches
⇔ because they always want other people to give them more.
⇔ There are three, even four things that always want more:
BSB The leech has two daughters:
⇔ Give [and] Give.
§ There are three [things that] are never satisfied, four [that] never say, ‘Enough!’:
MSB (Same as BSB above)
OEB No OEB PROV book available
WEBBE ⇔ “The leech has two daughters:
⇔ ‘Give, give.’
⇔ “There are three things that are never satisfied;
⇔ four that don’t say, ‘Enough!’:
WMBB (Same as above)
NET The leech has two daughters:
⇔ “Give! Give!”
⇔ There are three things that are never satisfied,
⇔ four that never say, “Enough” –
LSV To the leech [are] two daughters—Give! Give! Behold, three things are not satisfied,
Four have not said “Sufficiency”;
FBV The leech has two daughters who cry out, “Give me! Give me!”
¶ There are three things that are never satisfied, four that never say, “Enough!”:
T4T ⇔ Leeches are always wanting more blood to suck;
⇔ similarly, greedy people are always saying “Give me some!” or “Give me more!” [MET]
⇔ There are four things that are never ◄satisfied/content with what they have►;
⇔ they always want more [LIT]:
LEB • For the leech, there are two daughters; “Give, give!” they cry.
• As for three of these, they are not satisfied;
• as for four, they do not say enough.
BBE The night-spirit has two daughters, Give, give. There are three things which are never full, even four which never say, Enough:
Moff The leech has daughters twain:
⇔ “Give, give!” is their refrain.
¶
⇔ Three things are never satisfied
⇔ four never say “Enough!”--
JPS The horseleech hath two daughters: 'Give, give.' There are three things that are never satisfied, yea, four that say not: 'Enough':
ASV ⇔ The horseleach hath two daughters, crying, Give, give.
⇔ There are three things that are never satisfied,
⇔ Yea, four that say not, Enough:
DRA The horseleech hath two daughters that say: Bring, bring. There are three things that never are satisfied, and the fourth never saith: It is enough.
YLT To the leech [are] two daughters, 'Give, give, Lo, three things are not satisfied, Four have not said 'Sufficiency;'
Drby The leech hath two daughters: Give, give. There are three [things] never satisfied; four which say not, It is enough:
RV The horseleach hath two daughters, Crying, Give, give. There are three things that are never satisfied, yea, four that say not, Enough:
(The horseleach hath/has two daughters, Crying, Give, give. There are three things that are never satisfied, yea, four that say not, Enough: )
SLT To the leech two daughters: Give, give. Behold, three shall not satisfied; four shall not say, Wealth:
Wbstr The horse-leech hath two daughters, crying , Give, give. There are three things that are never satisfied, yes , four things say not, It is enough:
KJB-1769 The horseleach hath two daughters, crying, Give, give. There are three things that are never satisfied, yea, four things say not, It is enough:[fn]
(The horseleach hath/has two daughters, crying, Give, give. There are three things that are never satisfied, yea, four things say not, It is enough: )
30.15 It is…: Heb. Wealth
KJB-1611 [fn]The horse-leach hath two daughters, crying, Giue, giue. There are three things that are neuer satisfied, yea foure things say not, It is enough:
(The horse-leach hath/has two daughters, crying, Giue, giue. There are three things that are never satisfied, yea four things say not, It is enough:)
30:15 Heb. wealth.
Bshps The horse leache hath two daughters crying: bryng hyther, bryng hyther. There be three thynges that are neuer satisfied, yea foure thynges sayth neuer hoe:
(The horse leache hath/has two daughters crying: bring hither/here, bring hither/here. There be three things that are never satisfied, yea four things saith/says never hoe:)
Gnva The horse leache hath two daughters which crye, Giue, giue. There be three things that will not be satisfied: yea, foure that say not, It is ynough.
(The horse leache hath/has two daughters which cry, Giue, giue. There be three things that will not be satisfied: yea, four that say not, It is enough. )
Cvdl This generacion (which is like an horsleche) hath two doughters: ye one is called, fetch hither: the other, brynge hither.
(This generation (which is like an horsleche) hath/has two daughters: ye/you_all one is called, fetch hither/here: the other, bring hither/here.)
Wycl The watir leche hath twei douytris, seiynge, Brynge, bringe. Thre thingis ben vnable to be fillid, and the fourthe, that seith neuere, It suffisith;
(The water leche hath/has twain/two_or_both daughters, saying, Bring, bringe. Thre things been unable to be filled, and the forth, that saith/says never, It suffisith;)
Luth Die Igel hat zwo Töchter: Bring her, bring her! Drei Dinge sind nicht zu sättigen, und das vierte spricht nicht: Es ist genug:
(The hedgehog has two daughters: Bring her, bring her! Drei things are not to/for saturate/satisfy, and the fourth speaks/says not: It is enough:)
ClVg Sanguisugæ duæ sunt filiæ, dicentes: Affer, affer. Tria sunt insaturabilia, et quartum quod numquam dicit: Sufficit.[fn]
(Bloodugæ two are daughters, saying: Affer, affer. Tria are insaturabilia, and fourth that never he_says: Sufficit. )
30.15 Sanguisugæ duæ sunt filiæ. Diabolus, qui siti peccata suadendi perpetuo ardet; Duæ filiæ, quæ ejus imitantur ardorem, luxuria et philargyria. Nam luxuriæ, quo liberius frena laxantur, eo noxius delectatur; et Crescit amor nummi, quantum ipsa pecunia crescit. Tria sunt insaturabilia. Infernus nunquam redundat; meretrix habet similia. Corpus non satiatur deliciis, et avarus non dicit, sufficit; alii infernum dicunt diabolum, qui non satiatur seductione humana.
30.15 Bloodugæ two are daughters. Diabolus, who/which thirst sins suadendi forever ardet; Two daughters, which his imitantur ardour/enthusiasm, luxury/extravagance and philargyria. For/Surely luxuriæ, where childrenus frena laxantur, by_him night/darknessius is_delighted; and Crescit love nummi, quantum herself money/wealth grows. Tria are insaturabilia. Infernus never/certainly_not overflow; prostitute has similar. Corpus not/no satiatur delights, and avarus not/no he_says, enough; others hell they_say devil, who/which not/no satiatur seductione human.
30:15-16 The number parallelism (three . . . no, four) is a device for presenting a list of poetic examples. This list shows powers that are insatiable and often dangerous. See also 30:18-19, 21-23, 29-31.
• The grave, which stands for death itself, never seems to have enough—people keep dying (27:20).
• barren womb: Women who are unable to have children often long to have them, like Sarah until she gave birth to Isaac, Rebekah until the birth of Esau and Jacob, and Hannah until the birth of Samuel.
• The thirsty desert and a fire consume anything in their path.
This section is a collection of verses that were written or organized by Agur the son of Jakeh.Some scholars think that Agur wrote or collected only verses 1–4, 1–6, 1–9, or 1–14. UBS (page 617), Toy (page 518), and Longman (page 513) are among those who list some of these possibilities. The GNT indicates with quotation marks that Agur’s words end after v.6. No other versions indicate that Agur’s words end before the end of the chapter. Waltke (volume I, page 26) strongly defends the entire chapter as the “oracle” of Agur on the basis of its structural unity. Kidner (page 178) divides the chapter into two sections (1–9) and (10–33), but identifies both as coming from “the sage.” The title of this section (30:1a) is the only place in Scripture that Agur is mentioned. The section is divided into paragraphs that vary from one to five verses. The Notes will suggest a paragraph heading for all paragraphs after 30:1a. It is suggested that you use similar headings in your translation to help the readers follow the changes of topic and audience.
The first nine verses contain Agur’s personal thoughts and prayers. Some are addressed to God, others to his audience. The rest of the chapter contains proverbs on various topics. Some are individual warnings or statements (30:10, 17, 20, 32–33). Others contain several kinds of lists of four items each. The lists in verses 15b–16, 18–19, 21–23, and 29–31 have the same form as the numerical proverb in 6:16–19. (See the paragraph summary for 6:16–19 and the notes on 6:16a–b.) The lists in verses 11–14 and 24–28 have different forms. These will be described in the paragraph summaries where they first occur.
Some other headings for this section are:
The Words of Agur (ESV)
Wise Words from Agur (NCV)
Words that the LORD caused Agur to make known
This verse part is a separate proverb. Although it has the number two and the following numerical proverb has the numbers three and four, it is not part of that numerical proverb. It is related to the preceding verse and the following numerical proverb by the topic of greed.McKane (pages 652–653) makes the point that this proverb is associated with 30:15b–16 by the similar topic of “insatiability,” but is not part of that numerical proverb, because no other numerical proverbs have such a form. Whybray (page 413) echoes the same opinion.
The leech has two daughters: Give and Give.
¶ The bloodsucking leech has two daughters. Both their names are “Give!”
¶ The leech has two mouths that suck blood. They are like greedy daughters. The name of one is “Give me more!” The name of the other is also “Give me more!”
¶ Greed has two daughters named “More!” and “More!”
The leech has two daughters: Give and Give: There are two ways to interpret the words Give and Give:
These words are the names of the two daughters. For example:
The leech has two daughters: Give and Give. (ESV) (BSB, CEV, ESV, GW, NAB, NASB, NCV, NJPS, GNT)
These are the words that the two daughters say. For example:
The leech has two daughters; ‘Give,’ says one, and ‘Give,’ says the other. (REB) (KJV, NET, NIV, NJB, NLT, NRSV, REB)
The Notes will follow interpretation (1), along with a slight majority of versions and scholars, but interpretation (2) is equally acceptable. With either interpretation the point of the proverb is the same: the leech’s two daughters always want more blood.
The leech has two daughters: The phrase two daughters refers to the two suckers that a leech has at the ends of its body. The leech uses these suckers or mouths to suck blood from a person or animal.
The leech is personified here as a mother with two daughters. Some other ways to translate the personification in this verse part are:
Keep the personification. For example:
A leech has two daughters, and both are named “Give me!” (GNT)
Use a simile. For example:
The two mouths/suckers of a leech are like its two daughters. The names of both of them are “Give me more!”
The two suckers of a leech are like two greedy daughters named “Give me!” and “Give me!”
Substitute the greed of the leech for the leech itself. For example:
Greed has twins, each named “Give me!” (CEV)
leech: This word refers specifically to the horseleech (KJV).It is identified as the horseleech by Waltke (page 487), Fox (page 867), and Cohen (page 209). Most versions use the more general word leech. In language areas where the leech is not well known, some other ways to translate this word are:
Add a word that describes the leech or use a descriptive phrase. For example:
bloodsucking leech (GW)
a kind of worm that sucks blood
Use a borrowed word along with a picture and/or a footnote. A suggested footnote is:
A leech is a worm that has a sucker or mouth at each end of its body. It fastens itself to a person or animal and sucks its blood until it swells up.
Use the significance of the leech in this proverb rather than the word itself. For example:
Greed has two daughters (NCV)
This paragraph is a numerical proverb. A numerical proverb lists things that are similar in some way. In a numerical proverb, the second line contains a number (in this case, four) that is one greater than the parallel number (three) in the first line. This kind of proverb is always followed by a list of items that correspond to the number in the second line. The two numbers are primarily a poetic feature. They should not imply that the author is unsure of the number of items or that he changed his mind. They should also not imply that the items in the list are the only things that belong to that category. One way to avoid these wrong implications is to use a general phrase instead of the first number. For example:
There are some things that…four of them never say…This suggestion comes from UBS (page 633).
(combined/reordered)
¶ There are four things that think they never get enough, so they are never satisfied.
Here are four things that are never satisfied.
The parallel parts in bold print are similar in meaning. The two numbers function together as a pair. They indicate that the list in 30:16a–d will contain four things that are never satisfied.
15b“There are three things that are never satisfied,
15c four that never say, ‘Enough!’
There is an ellipsis in 30:15c. In some languages, it may be necessary to supply the missing phrase from 30:14b. For example:
15c there are four that never say, ‘Enough!’
There are three things that are never satisfied,
¶ Three things cannot be satisfied.
¶ Here/These are three things that always want more.
¶ Here are some things that are never satisfied.
There are three things that are never satisfied: Some other ways to translate this line are:
Three things are never satisfied. (GW)
Here/These are three things that always want more.
four that never say, ‘Enough!’:
Four things never say, “That is enough.”
In fact, four things never say that they have enough.
Four of them always want more.
four that never say, ‘Enough!’: In some languages, it may be helpful to introduce this line with a word such as “Indeed” or “Actually.” Some other ways to translate this line are:
really four that never say, ‘I’ve had enough!’ (NCV)
Four things never say that they do not want any more.
In some languages, it may be more natural to combine and/or reorder the parallel parts. For example:
There are four things that are never satisfied: (GNT)
Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metaphor
לַֽעֲלוּקָ֨ה ׀ שְׁתֵּ֥י בָנוֹת֮
(Some words not found in UHB: [belong]_to,a_leech two(fd) daughters give give three they(f) not satisfied four not say enough )
Here, Agur speaks of a greedy person as if that person were a leech and as if what that person demands from others were Two daughters. If it would be helpful in your language, you could express the meaning plainly or use a simile. Alternate translation: “Greedy people always say” or “Greedy people are like a leech with two daughters”
Note 2 topic: translate-unknown
לַֽעֲלוּקָ֨ה
(Some words not found in UHB: [belong]_to,a_leech two(fd) daughters give give three they(f) not satisfied four not say enough )
A leech is a type of worm that attaches itself to the skin of a person or animal in order to suck blood. If your readers would not be familiar with this type of animal, you could use the name of something similar in your area or you could use a more general term. Alternate translation: “are for the blood-sucking animal” or “are for the parasite”
Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / explicit
הַ֤ב ׀ הַ֥ב
give give
This could refer to: (1) the names of the Two daughters. Alternate translation: “they are named Give and Give” (2) what the Two daughters say. Alternate translation: “they say, ‘Give! Give!’”
שָׁל֣וֹשׁ הֵ֭נָּה לֹ֣א תִשְׂבַּ֑עְנָה אַ֝רְבַּ֗ע לֹא־אָ֥מְרוּ הֽוֹן
three they(f) not satisfied four not say enough
The second half of [30:15](../30/15.md) and all of [30:16](../30/16.md) are the second of six numerical sayings in this chapter. See the discussion of numerical sayings in the Chapter Introduction.
Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / parallelism
שָׁל֣וֹשׁ הֵ֭נָּה לֹ֣א תִשְׂבַּ֑עְנָה אַ֝רְבַּ֗ע לֹא־אָ֥מְרוּ הֽוֹן
three they(f) not satisfied four not say enough
To make a comprehensive statement, Agur is using a rhetorical device in which the speaker names a number that should be sufficient to illustrate his point and then increases that number by one for emphasis. Since the meaning of both clauses is the same, you could also combine them into one clause. If it would be helpful in your language, you could state the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: “These four things are absolutely never satisfied”
Note 5 topic: writing-poetry
לֹ֣א תִשְׂבַּ֑עְנָה
not satisfied
Parallelism is common in Hebrew poetry. You may want to begin a new line at the start of each parallel statement. If not, use a form in your language that is natural for expressing poetry. Alternate translation: “never have enough for themselves”