Open Bible Data Home  About  News  OET Key

OETOET-RVOET-LVULTUSTBSBBLBAICNTOEBWEBBEWMBBNETLSVFBVTCNTT4TLEBBBEMoffJPSWymthASVDRAYLTDrbyRVWbstrKJB-1769KJB-1611BshpsGnvaCvdlTNTWyclSR-GNTUHBBrLXXBrTrRelatedTopics Parallel InterlinearReferenceDictionarySearch

parallelVerse INTGENEXOLEVNUMDEUJOBJOSJDGRUTH1SA2SAPSAAMOSHOS1KI2KI1CH2CHPROECCSNGJOELMICISAZEPHABJERLAMYNANAHOBADANEZEEZRAESTNEHHAGZECMALYHNMARKMATLUKEACTsYACGAL1TH2TH1COR2CORROMCOLPHMEPHPHP1TIMTIT1PET2PET2TIMHEBYUD1YHN2YHN3YHNREV

Acts IntroC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28

Acts 17 V1V2V3V4V5V6V7V8V9V10V11V12V13V14V15V16V17V18V19V20V21V22V23V24V25V26V27V28V30V31V32V33V34

Parallel ACTs 17:29

Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.

BI Acts 17:29 ©

Text critical issues=small word differences Clarity of original=clearImportance=normal(All still tentative.)

OET (OET-RV)So since we are God’s offspring, we shouldn’t be putting gold or silver or stone craftsmanship in the same class as the divine.

OET-LVTherefore being descent of_ the _god, we_ought not to_be_thinking about_gold or silver or a_stone mark of_the_craft and thoughts of_human_origin, to_be similar the divine.

SR-GNTΓένος οὖν ὑπάρχοντες τοῦ ˚Θεοῦ, οὐκ ὀφείλομεν νομίζειν χρυσῷ ἀργύρῳ λίθῳ χαράγματι τέχνης καὶ ἐνθυμήσεως ἀνθρώπου, τὸ θεῖον εἶναι ὅμοιον.
   (Genos oun huparⱪontes tou ˚Theou, ouk ofeilomen nomizein ⱪrusōi argurōi lithōi ⱪaragmati teⱪnaʸs kai enthumaʸseōs anthrōpou, to theion einai homoion.)

Key: khaki:verbs, light-green:nominative/subject, orange:accusative/object, pink:genitive/possessor, cyan:dative/indirect object, red:negative.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).

ULTTherefore, being offspring of God, we ought not to consider the Divine to be similar to gold or silver or stone—images of the skill and imagination of man.

USTTherefore, because we are God’s children, we should not think that God is like an idol that a person would design and make out of gold, silver, or stone.

BSBTherefore, being offspring of God, we should not think that the Divine Being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by man’s skill and imagination.

BLBTherefore, being offspring of God, we ought not to consider the Divine Being to be like to gold or to silver or to stone, a graven thing of man's craft and imagination.


AICNT“Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the divine nature is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and thought of man.

OEBTherefore, as the offspring of God, we must not think that the Deity has any resemblance to anything made of gold, or silver, or stone – a work of human art and imagination.

WEBBEBeing then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold, or silver, or stone, engraved by art and design of man.

WMBB (Same as above)

NETSo since we are God’s offspring, we should not think the deity is like gold or silver or stone, an image made by human skill and imagination.

LSVBeing, therefore, offspring of God, we ought not to think the Godhead to be like to gold, or silver, or stone, [an] engraving of art and imagination of man;

FBVSince we are his family we shouldn't think that God is like gold, or silver, or stone, shaped by human artistry and thinking.

TCNT  § Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold, silver, or stone, an image formed by the skill and imagination of man.

T4TTherefore, because we are God’s children and can communicate like God does, we (inc) should not think that he is anything like an image that people have made of gold or silver or stone which cannot communicate. Those images are designed and skillfully made {People design and make those images}, but they are not alive.

LEBTherefore, because we[fn] are offspring of God, we ought not to think the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by human skill and thought.


17:29 *Here “because” is supplied as a component of the participle (“are”) which is understood as causal

BBEIf then we are the offspring of God, it is not right for us to have the idea that God is like gold or silver or stone, formed by the art or design of man.

MoffNo Moff ACTs book available

WymthSince then we are God's offspring, we ought not to imagine that His nature resembles gold or silver or marble, or anything sculptured by the art and inventive faculty of man.

ASVBeing then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and device of man.

DRABeing therefore the offspring of God, we must not suppose the divinity to be like unto gold, or silver, or stone, the graving of art, and device of man.

YLT'Being, therefore, offspring of God, we ought not to think the Godhead to be like to gold, or silver, or stone, graving of art and device of man;

DrbyBeing therefore [the] offspring of [fn]God, we ought not to think that which is divine to be like gold or silver or stone, [the] graven form of man's art and imagination.


17.29 Elohim

RVBeing then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and device of man.

WbstrBeing then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like to gold, or silver, or stone graven by art and man's device.

KJB-1769Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

KJB-1611[fn]Forasmuch then as wee are the offspring of God, wee ought not to thinke that the Godhead is like vnto golde, or siluer, or stone grauen by arte, and mans deuice.
   (Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to thinke that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone graven by arte, and mans deuice.)


17:29 Esai 40.18

BshpsForasmuch then as we are the offpring of God, we ought not to thynke that the Godhead is lyke vnto golde, siluer, or stone, grauen by art, and mans deuice.
   (Forasmuch then as we are the offpring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, silver, or stone, graven by art, and mans deuice.)

GnvaForasmuch then, as we are the generation of God, we ought not to thinke that ye Godhead is like vnto gold, or siluer, or stone grauen by arte and the inuention of man.
   (Forasmuch then, as we are the generation of God, we ought not to thinke that ye/you_all Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone graven by art and the invention of man. )

CvdlFor as moch then as we are the generacion of God, we oughte not to thinke that the Godheade is like vnto golde or syluer, or ymagery worke of the crafte or ymaginacion of man.
   (For as much then as we are the generation of God, we oughte not to thinke that the Godheade is like unto gold or silver, or imagery work of the crafte or imagineacion of man.)

TNTFor as moche then as we are the generacion of God we ought not to thynke that the godhed is lyke vnto golde silver or stone graven by crafte and ymaginacion of man.
   (For as much then as we are the generation of God we ought not to think that the godhed is like unto gold silver or stone graven by crafte and imagineacion of man. )

WyclTherfor sithen we ben the kynde of God, we schulen not deme, that godli thing is lijk gold, and siluer, ethir stoon, ethir to grauyng of craft and thouyt of man.
   (Therefore since we been the kind of God, we should not deme, that godli thing is like gold, and silver, ethir stone, ethir to grauyng of craft and thouyt of man.)

LuthSo wir denn göttliches Geschlechts sind, sollen wir nicht meinen, die GOttheit sei gleich den güldenen, silbernen und steinernen Bildern, durch menschliche Gedanken gemacht.
   (So we/us because göttliches Geschlechts are, sollen we/us not meinen, the Godheit be gleich the güldenen, silbernen and steinernen Bildern, through menschliche Gedanken made.)

ClVgGenus ergo cum simus Dei, non debemus æstimare auro, aut argento, aut lapidi, sculpturæ artis, et cogitationis hominis, divinum esse simile.[fn]
   (Genus therefore when/with simus of_God, not/no debemus æstimare with_gold, aut argento, aut lapidi, sculpturæ artis, and cogitationis of_man, divinum esse simile. )


17.29 Genus ergo, etc., non debemus. RAB. Homo in medio est, habens Deum superiorem, aurum ex argentum, cum cæteris hujusmodi inferiora, quæ non debent ei comparari.


17.29 Genus therefore, etc., non debemus. RAB. Homo in in_the_middle it_is, habens God superiorem, aurum from argentum, when/with cæteris huyusmodi inferiora, which not/no debent to_him comparari.

UGNTγένος οὖν ὑπάρχοντες τοῦ Θεοῦ, οὐκ ὀφείλομεν νομίζειν χρυσῷ, ἢ ἀργύρῳ, ἢ λίθῳ χαράγματι τέχνης καὶ ἐνθυμήσεως ἀνθρώπου, τὸ θεῖον εἶναι ὅμοιον.
   (genos oun huparⱪontes tou Theou, ouk ofeilomen nomizein ⱪrusōi, aʸ argurōi, aʸ lithōi ⱪaragmati teⱪnaʸs kai enthumaʸseōs anthrōpou, to theion einai homoion.)

SBL-GNTγένος οὖν ὑπάρχοντες τοῦ θεοῦ οὐκ ὀφείλομεν νομίζειν χρυσῷ ἢ ἀργύρῳ ἢ λίθῳ, χαράγματι τέχνης καὶ ἐνθυμήσεως ἀνθρώπου, τὸ θεῖον εἶναι ὅμοιον.
   (genos oun huparⱪontes tou theou ouk ofeilomen nomizein ⱪrusōi aʸ argurōi aʸ lithōi, ⱪaragmati teⱪnaʸs kai enthumaʸseōs anthrōpou, to theion einai homoion.)

TC-GNT  § Γένος οὖν ὑπάρχοντες τοῦ Θεοῦ, οὐκ ὀφείλομεν νομίζειν χρυσῷ ἢ ἀργύρῳ ἢ λίθῳ, χαράγματι τέχνης καὶ ἐνθυμήσεως ἀνθρώπου, τὸ θεῖον εἶναι ὅμοιον.
   ( § Genos oun huparⱪontes tou Theou, ouk ofeilomen nomizein ⱪrusōi aʸ argurōi aʸ lithōi, ⱪaragmati teⱪnaʸs kai enthumaʸseōs anthrōpou, to theion einai homoion. )

Key for above GNTs: yellow:punctuation differs (from our SR-GNT base).


TSNTyndale Study Notes:

17:16-34 In this chapter, we see Paul presented as a model witness for Christ, engaging the thinkers of his day and challenging them with the Christian message. Paul quoted writers his audience would be familiar with and showed the relevance of the gospel by dialoguing with them, critiquing their assumptions, and offering Jesus as a constructive alternative (see Col 1:28). Paul reminded these proud intellectuals that there is a living God to whom all human beings are answerable; that they will be judged by him through Jesus, whom God raised from the dead; and that they should therefore repent and put their faith in Jesus.

TTNTyndale Theme Notes:

The Unknown God

When Paul spoke to the Areopagus, the “high council of the city” of Athens (Acts 17:19), he was speaking to people who did not share his faith in the God of Abraham and Moses who had revealed himself “many times and in many ways to [his] ancestors through the prophets” (Heb 1:1). The members of his audience had a very different definition of the divine. A host of divinities inhabited their world, and the common people retained much of their belief in the ancient gods. But many of the cultural elite of Athens no longer believed in the gods in any literal sense. Instead, they held to either a form of materialism (the physical is everything) or pantheism (the divine inhabits everything).

What they all shared in common was the absence of the idea that there is one true God who is Lord of all. Their myths told of the activities of various gods, but they did not have faith that the ultimate reality, God himself, could be known. Instead, they reasoned and discussed “the latest ideas,” hoping for a better understanding of the nature of things.

There were a wide variety of philosophical ideas current in Athens when Paul visited, but two main schools of thought dominated, Stoicism and Epicureanism (Acts 17:18).

Zeno of Citium (334~262 BC) founded Stoicism. Stoics studied nature’s laws and believed in the Logos, a pervasive organizing and sustaining force that gives all things their essential nature and so gives life and reason to humanity. The good life is one in which reason rules, and peace of mind and harmony with nature prevail. Many prominent statesmen were Stoics or influenced by Stoicism, including Cicero, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius. Stoic ideas proved attractive to some Christians because of the similarities between the Stoic logos and the divine Logos (John 1:1-18), and between the idea of natural law and the law of God.

Those who followed Epicurus (341–270 BC) were empiricists; they relied upon sense experience (as opposed to reason) for knowledge. Epicureans were concerned with natural evidence and were unenthusiastic about mathematics. Their focus was ethics, the study of right behavior; they judged the value of an action or thing in terms of the pleasure or pain it brought. Epicurus saw belief in gods (meddling and powerful beings who terrified ordinary mortals) as a serious threat to tranquility. For him and his followers, neither the gods nor death (which is the end) should be feared.

When Paul spoke in that context, he used their own poets to proclaim things that they could barely comprehend: That the God who made everything is both personal and knowable; that he revealed himself clearly, historically, and definitively in Jesus Christ; that death is not followed by either the cessation of existence or the migration of the soul, but by judgment; and that the proof of all of this is the resurrection of Christ from the dead.

What was foolishness to most of the Greeks of Athens turns out to be the ultimate truth: God is knowable, and can be known through Jesus Christ.

Passages for Further Study

Ps 50:7-15; Isa 42:5-7; Acts 17:16-32; Rom 1:18-32; Col 1:15-23; 2:6-12; 1 Thes 1:9-10; Heb 1:1-4


UTNuW Translation Notes:

Note 1 topic: figures-of-speech / metaphor

γένος & ὑπάρχοντες τοῦ Θεοῦ

descent & being ¬the ˱of˲_God

Paul is speaking as if people were literally God’s offspring or children. He means that God created people, and they are his creatures. If it would be clearer in your language, you could express this metaphor as a simile. Alternate translation: [being like God’s children]

Note 2 topic: figures-of-speech / nominaladj

τὸ θεῖον

the divine

Paul is using the adjective Divine as a noun to mean God, who is divine. ULT capitalizes the word to show this. Your language may use adjectives in the same way. If not, you could translate this word with an equivalent phrase. Alternate translation: [God]

Note 3 topic: figures-of-speech / metonymy

χρυσῷ, ἢ ἀργύρῳ, ἢ λίθῳ

˱about˲_gold or silver or /a/_stone

Paul is referring to idols by association with the materials out of which people made idols. If it would be helpful in your language, you could use an equivalent expression or express the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: [to idols made of gold or silver or stone]

Note 4 topic: figures-of-speech / possession

χαράγματι τέχνης καὶ ἐνθυμήσεως ἀνθρώπου

mark ˱of˲_/the/_craft and thoughts ˱of˲_human_origin

Paul is using the possessive form not to mean images that resemble human skill and imagination but to describe the qualities that people use to create images or idols. Alternate translation: [images that people create by using their skill and imagination]

Note 5 topic: figures-of-speech / gendernotations

ἀνθρώπου

˱of˲_human_origin

Although the term man is masculine, Paul is using the word in a generic sense that includes both men and women. If it would be helpful to your readers, you could use a term in your language that is clearly inclusive of both men and women. Alternate translation: [of humans]

BI Acts 17:29 ©