Note: This view shows ‘verses’ which are not natural language units and hence sometimes only part of a sentence will be visible. Normally the OET discourages the reading of individual ‘verses’, but this view is only designed for doing comparisons of different translations. Click on any Bible version abbreviation down the left-hand side to see the verse in more of its context. The OET segments on this page are still very early looks into the unfinished texts of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check these texts in advance before using in public.
Key: khaki:verbs.
Note: Automatic aligning of the OET-RV to the LV is done by some temporary software, hence the OET-RV alignments are incomplete (and may occasionally be wrong).
BrLXXΚαὶ τὰ πρόβατα αὐτῶν, καὶ τοὺς βόας αὐτῶν, καὶ τοὺς ὄνους αὐτῶν, ὅσα τε ἦν ἐν τῇ πόλει, καὶ ὅσα ἦν ἐν τῷ πεδίῳ, ἔλαβον. (Kai ta probata autōn, kai tous boas autōn, kai tous onous autōn, hosa te aʸn en taʸ polei, kai hosa aʸn en tōi pediōi, elabon. )
BrTrAnd their sheep, and their oxen, and their asses they took, and all things whatsoever were in the city, and whatsoever were in the plain.
ULTThey took their flocks and their herds and their donkeys, and what was in the city and what was in the fields.
USTThey plundered whatever was in the city and in the surrounding fields, including the people’s flocks of sheep and goats, their herds of cattle and their donkeys.
BSBThey took their flocks and herds and donkeys, and everything else in the city or in the field.
OEBThey took their flocks and their herds and their donkeys and all that which was in the city and all that which was in the field.
WEBBEThey took their flocks, their herds, their donkeys, that which was in the city, that which was in the field,
NETThey took their flocks, herds, and donkeys, as well as everything in the city and in the surrounding fields.
LSVtheir flock and their herd, and their donkeys, and that which [is] in the city, and that which [is] in the field, have they taken;
FBVThey took their sheep, goats, cattle, and donkeys. They took whatever was in the town, and in the fields—
T4TThey took away the people’s sheep and goats, their cattle, their donkeys, and everything else that they wanted from inside the city and from out in the countryside.
LEBThey took their flocks and their cattle and their donkeys, and whatever was in the field.
BBEThey took their flocks and their herds and their asses and everything in their town and in their fields,
JPSThey took their flocks and their herds and their asses, and that which was in the city and that which was in the field;
ASVThey took their flocks and their herds and their asses, and that which was in the city, and that which was in the field;
DRAAnd they took their sheep and their herds and their asses, wasting all they had in their houses and in the fields.
YLTtheir flock and their herd, and their asses, and that which [is] in the city, and that which [is] in the field, have they taken;
DrbyTheir sheep, and their oxen, and their asses, and what [was] in the city, and what [was] in the field they took;
RVThey took their flocks and their herds and their asses, and that which was in the city, and that which was in the field;
WbstrThey took their sheep, and their oxen, and their asses, and that which was in the city, and that which was in the field.
KJB-1769They took their sheep, and their oxen, and their asses, and that which was in the city, and that which was in the field,
KJB-1611They tooke their sheepe, and their oxen, and their asses, and that which was in the citie, and that which was in the field. (Modernised spelling is same as from KJB-1769 above, apart from punctuation)
BshpsAnd toke their sheepe, oxen, and their asses, and whatsoeuer was in the citie, and also in the fieldes. (And took their sheep, oxen, and their asses, and whatsoever was in the city, and also in the fields.)
GnvaThey tooke their sheepe and their beeues, and their asses, and whatsoeuer was in the citie, and in the fieldes. (They took their sheep and their beeues, and their asses, and whatsoever was in the city, and in the fields. )
Cvdland toke their shepe, oxen, Asses, and what so euer was in the cite and in the londe, (and took their sheep, oxen, Asses, and what so ever was in the cite and in the land,)
WyclAnd thei wastiden the scheep of tho men, and droues of oxun, and assis, and alle thingis that weren in howsis and feeldis, (And they wastiden the sheep of those men, and droves of oxen, and assis, and all things that were in howsis and fields,)
Luthund nahmen ihre Schafe, Rinder, Esel und was in der Stadt und auf dem Felde war, (and took their/her sheep, Rinder, donkey and what/which in the/of_the city and on to_him field was,)
ClVgOves eorum, et armenta, et asinos, cunctaque vastantes quæ in domibus et in agris erant, (Oves their, and armenta, and asinos, cunctaque vastantes which in domibus and in agris erant, )
34:1-31 Once Jacob and his family settled in the land, the Canaanite presence became a threat. This account is a stern warning to the Israelites about the possibility of their being defiled by the Canaanites. The nation of Israel was later commanded not to intermarry or make treaties with them, for they were a corrupt and corrupting people. This chapter implicitly warns against becoming familiar with the way they lived (34:1-2). It also taught Israel that in dealing with the Canaanites, they were to keep their integrity and not use the holy things of the covenant for deception and slaughter (34:13); Israel’s reputation was at stake in the land (34:30). For their ruthless violence, Simeon and Levi were passed over in the birthright blessing (49:5-7).
As with many of the stories of the Bible, the events of Jacob’s life are often misunderstood by readers as disjointed pericopes arranged primarily for theological and cultural purposes. Because of this, readers often fail to see that these stories follow a clear geographical progression of the patriarch throughout the land of Canaan. This realistic and coherent geographical framework behind the stories gives strong support to the belief that these stories are authentic, historical accounts of the experiences of Jacob and his ancestors. The overall framework for virtually all of Jacob’s stories is very simple: Jacob is born and raised in southern Canaan but comes into conflict with his twin brother Esau, so he flees to Paddan-aram in Mesopotamia (Genesis 25-28; see “Jacob Goes to Paddan-Aram” map). There he builds a large family and great wealth (Genesis 29-30) and eventually returns to southern Canaan, likely retracing the exact steps he followed when he fled (Genesis 31-35; see also “Jacob Returns to Canaan” map). During this time, Esau moves to the hill country of Seir, likely just south of southern Canaan (“Edom and the Land of Seir” map), and establishes his own family there, giving rise to the nation of Edom (Genesis 36). Though the primary intent of Jacob’s return was no doubt to resettle in Canaan, comments made during his reunion with Esau near Peniel may reveal that he also intended to travel even further to Seir to visit his brother there (Genesis 33:12-14). After crossing from Mahanaim to Peniel in Gilead, Jacob reunites with Esau and settles in Succoth for a time and builds a house for himself and booths for his cattle. He eventually crosses the Jordan River and enters Canaan, stopping first at the ancient city of Shechem. There Jacob’s daughter Dinah is defiled by the son of the region’s leader, and her brothers take revenge by killing all the men of the city. Thus, Jacob is forced to leave, but first he calls upon all his household to purify themselves. He collects their idols and rings and buries them beneath a tree in Shechem. Upon reaching Bethel, Jacob builds an altar and calls it El-bethel. The nurse of Jacob’s mother Rebekah also dies at Bethel and is buried under an oak below the town, leading them to call the place Allon-bacuth (“oak of weeping”). Jacob and his family leave for Bethlehem, but very soon after they start the journey Rachel gives birth to Benjamin and then dies. Jacob buries her along the way, apparently near a place called Zelzah (or perhaps Elzah; see 1 Samuel 10 and “Saul Search for His Donkeys” map). Jacob continues on and camps beyond the tower of Eder, perhaps near Bethlehem, since that seems to have been his original destination. Finally Jacob reaches Mamre and Hebron. Soon after this Isaac dies, and Esau and Jacob bury him. The story of Jacob’s journey ends at Genesis 35, and we are not explicitly told if Jacob traveled even further to Seir. Genesis 36, however, catalogs the descendants of Esau, the Edomites, perhaps indicating that Jacob did indeed fulfill the intentions he stated in Genesis 33:12-14.
Though the patriarch Isaac moved from place to place several times within southern Canaan, compared to his father Abraham and his son Jacob, Isaac appears to have been a bit of a homebody. In fact, unless Isaac resettled in places not recorded in Scripture, the farthest extent he ever traveled appears to have been only about 90 miles (113 km). Yet, as the child of God’s promise to Abraham to build a great nation from his descendants, Isaac’s relatively simple life served as a critical bridge from Abraham to the beginnings of the twelve tribes of Israel, who were descended from Isaac’s son Jacob. It is likely that Isaac was born at Beersheba (see Genesis 21:1-24), and later Abraham offered him as a sacrifice on Mount Moriah (located at Jerusalem; see 2 Chronicles 3:1). Then Abraham, Isaac, and those with them returned to Beersheba (Genesis 22:1-19). When Isaac reached adulthood, his father sent a servant to bring back a bride for him from Aram-naharaim, far north of Canaan. When his bride, Rebekah, arrived, Isaac had just come from Beer-lahai-roi and settled in the Negev (Genesis 24:62). Later Isaac resettled with Rebekah in Beer-lahai-roi, and this may have been where their twins son Esau and Jacob were born. A famine forced Isaac to go to Gerar (Genesis 26:1-6) in “the land of the Philistines.” The distinct people group known as the Philistines in later books of the Bible did not arrive until the time of the Judges, so the term here must have referred to another people group living in this region, and this is supported by the fact that King Abimelech’s name is Semitic, not Aegean (the likely origin of the later Philistines). While Isaac was there, he repeated his father’s error (Genesis 20) by lying to the king that his wife was only his sister. Isaac also became increasingly prosperous at Gerar, so the Philistines told him to leave their region. Isaac moved away from the town of Gerar and settled further away in the valley of Gerar. There he dug a well, but the Philistines claimed it for themselves, so he called it Esek, meaning “argument.” So Isaac’s men dug another well and called it Sitnah (meaning “hostility”), but it led to more quarreling, so he dug yet another well and called it Rehoboth (meaning “open space”). The locations of these two later wells are not certain, but they may have been located near Ruheibeh as shown on this map. Then Isaac moved to Beersheba and built an altar. He also dug a well there, and King Abimelech of the Philistines came and exchanged oaths of peace with him. It was likely at Beersheba that Isaac blessed his sons Esau and Jacob, and both sons eventually left Canaan (see “Jacob Goes to Paddan-Aram” map). When Jacob later returned, he traveled to Mamre near Hebron and reunited with Isaac. Sometime after this Isaac died, and Jacob and Esau buried him there.
