Genesis — whole document

This OET (very) Literal Version was designed to be used as a view into the original language words, so as to be an aid to understanding the source text for the Readers’ Version, so you won’t get the best understanding from this single viewpoint. This is still an early look into the drafted text of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check the text in advance before using in public. This view displays the entire ‘book’ so it may be very long to scroll through.

The parsed Hebrew text used to create this file is Copyright © 2019 by https://hb.
openscriptures.org

1:12 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

1:12 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

2:10 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

2:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

3:17 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

6:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

7:23 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

8:17 OSHB variant note: הוצא: (x-qere) ’הַיְצֵ֣א’: lemma=3318 morph=HVhv2ms id=01S7t הַיְצֵ֣א

9:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

12:8 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

13:3 OSHB variant note: אהל/ה: (x-qere) ’אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙’: lemma=168 n=0.1.0 morph=HNcmsc/Sp3ms id=01Gdj אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙

14:2 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ים’: lemma=6636 n=0.1 morph=HNp id=01kJL צְבוֹיִ֔ים

14:2 OSHB note: We read one or more consonants in L differently from BHS.

14:8 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ם’: lemma=6636 n=1.1 morph=HNp id=01Jqs צְבוֹיִ֔ם

14:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

14:17 OSHB note: Marks an anomalous form.

14:17 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

15:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

16:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

16:5 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

17:20 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

18:9 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

19:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

19:33 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

22:2 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

22:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

24:33 OSHB variant note: ו/יישם: (x-qere) ’וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם’: lemma=c/7760 a morph=HC/VHw3ms id=01SiU וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם

24:36 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

25:23 OSHB variant note: גיים: (x-qere) ’גוֹיִם֙’: lemma=1471 a n=1.2.0 morph=HNcmpa id=01eWf גוֹיִם֙

26:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

26:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

27:3 OSHB variant note: צידה: (x-qere) ’צָֽיִד’: lemma=6720 n=0 morph=HNcbsa id=01ydd צָֽיִד

27:29 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ’: lemma=c/7812 morph=HC/Vvj3mp id=01DTM וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ

27:29 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.

27:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

29:19 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

30:11 OSHB variant note: ב/גד: (x-qere) ’בָּ֣א’: lemma=935 morph=HVqrmsa id=01Q3H בָּ֣א ’גָ֑ד’: lemma=1409 n=1 morph=HNcmsa id=01gKG גָ֑ד

30:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

30:37 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

31:42 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

31:48 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

31:51 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:1 Note: KJB: Gen.31.55

32:2 Note: KJB: Gen.32.1

32:3 Note: KJB: Gen.32.2

32:4 Note: KJB: Gen.32.3

32:5 Note: KJB: Gen.32.4

32:6 Note: KJB: Gen.32.5

32:7 Note: KJB: Gen.32.6

32:8 Note: KJB: Gen.32.7

32:9 Note: KJB: Gen.32.8

32:10 Note: KJB: Gen.32.9

32:11 Note: KJB: Gen.32.10

32:12 Note: KJB: Gen.32.11

32:13 Note: KJB: Gen.32.12

32:14 Note: KJB: Gen.32.13

32:15 Note: KJB: Gen.32.14

32:16 Note: KJB: Gen.32.15

32:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:17 Note: KJB: Gen.32.16

32:18 Note: KJB: Gen.32.17

32:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:19 Note: KJB: Gen.32.18

32:20 Note: KJB: Gen.32.19

32:21 Note: KJB: Gen.32.20

32:22 Note: KJB: Gen.32.21

32:23 Note: KJB: Gen.32.22

32:24 Note: KJB: Gen.32.23

32:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:25 Note: KJB: Gen.32.24

32:26 Note: KJB: Gen.32.25

32:27 Note: KJB: Gen.32.26

32:28 Note: KJB: Gen.32.27

32:29 Note: KJB: Gen.32.28

32:30 Note: KJB: Gen.32.29

32:31 Note: KJB: Gen.32.30

32:32 Note: KJB: Gen.32.31

32:33 Note: KJB: Gen.32.32

33:4 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

33:4 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

33:14 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

34:11 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

34:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

35:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

35:10 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

35:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

35:22 OSHB alternative note: וַ/יִּשְׁכַּב֙: (x-accent)וַ/יִּשְׁכַּ֕ב

35:22 OSHB alternative note: בִּלְהָה֙: (x-accent)בִּלְהָ֖ה

35:22 OSHB alternative note: אָבִ֔י/ו: (x-accent)אָבִ֑י/ו

35:22 OSHB alternative note: יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל: (x-accent)יִשְׂרָאֵֽל

36:5 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma=3266 morph=HNp id=01PEh יְע֥וּשׁ

36:13 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

36:14 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma=3266 morph=HNp id=019PN יְע֥וּשׁ

37:12 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

38:9 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

38:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

38:24 OSHB exegesis note: WLC has this word divided as כְּ/מִשְׁלֹ֣שׁ

38:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

39:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

39:20 OSHB variant note: אסורי: (x-qere) ’אֲסִירֵ֥י’: lemma=615 morph=HNcmpc id=01qVE אֲסִירֵ֥י

40:3 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

40:20 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

41:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

41:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

41:30 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

41:46 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:7 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:28 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ’: lemma=c/7812 n=0 morph=HC/Vvw3mp id=01UGx וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ

43:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:28 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.

45:6 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

47:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

49:8 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

49:10 OSHB variant note: שילה: (x-qere) ’שִׁיל֔וֹ’: lemma=7886 n=0.1 morph=HNp id=01KU3 שִׁיל֔וֹ

49:11 OSHB variant note: עיר/ה: (x-qere) ’עִיר֔/וֹ’: lemma=5895 n=1.1 morph=HNcmsc/Sp3ms id=01BN1 עִיר֔/וֹ

49:11 OSHB variant note: סות/ה: (x-qere) ’סוּתֽ/וֹ’: lemma=5497 n=0 morph=HNcmsc/Sp3ms id=01Chx סוּתֽ/וֹ

49:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.