OET-LV GEN book

This OET (very) Literal Version was designed to be used as a view into the original language words, so as to be an aid to understanding the source text for the Readers’ Version, so you won’t get the best understanding from this single viewpoint. This is still an early look into the drafted text of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check the text in advance before using in public. This view displays the entire ‘book’ so it may be very long to scroll through.

The parsed Hebrew text used to create this file is Copyright © 2019 by https://hb.
openscriptures.org

1:12 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

1:12 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

2:10 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

2:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

3:17 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

6:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

7:23 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

8:17 OSHB variant note: הוצא: (x-qere) ’הַיְצֵ֣א’: lemma_3318 morph_HVhv2ms id_01S7t הַיְצֵ֣א

9:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

12:8 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

13:3 OSHB variant note: אהל/ה: (x-qere) ’אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙’: lemma_168 n_0.1.0 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01Gdj אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙

14:2 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ים’: lemma_6636 n_0.1 morph_HNp id_01kJL צְבוֹיִ֔ים

14:2 OSHB note: We read one or more consonants in L differently from BHS.

14:8 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ם’: lemma_6636 n_1.1 morph_HNp id_01Jqs צְבוֹיִ֔ם

14:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

14:17 OSHB note: Marks an anomalous form.

14:17 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.

15:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

16:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

16:5 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

17:20 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

18:9 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

19:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

19:33 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

22:2 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

22:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

24:33 OSHB variant note: ו/יישם: (x-qere) ’וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם’: lemma_c/7760 a morph_HC/VHw3ms id_01SiU וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם

24:36 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

25:23 OSHB variant note: גיים: (x-qere) ’גוֹיִם֙’: lemma_1471 a n_1.2.0 morph_HNcmpa id_01eWf גוֹיִם֙

26:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

26:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

27:3 OSHB variant note: צידה: (x-qere) ’צָֽיִד’: lemma_6720 n_0 morph_HNcbsa id_01ydd צָֽיִד

27:29 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ’: lemma_c/7812 morph_HC/Vvj3mp id_01DTM וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ

27:29 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.

27:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

29:19 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

30:11 OSHB variant note: ב/גד: (x-qere) ’בָּ֣א’: lemma_935 morph_HVqrmsa id_01Q3H בָּ֣א ’גָ֑ד’: lemma_1409 n_1 morph_HNcmsa id_01gKG גָ֑ד

30:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

30:37 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

31:42 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.

31:48 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

31:51 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:1 Note: KJB: Gen.31.55

32:2 Note: KJB: Gen.32.1

32:3 Note: KJB: Gen.32.2

32:4 Note: KJB: Gen.32.3

32:5 Note: KJB: Gen.32.4

32:6 Note: KJB: Gen.32.5

32:7 Note: KJB: Gen.32.6

32:8 Note: KJB: Gen.32.7

32:9 Note: KJB: Gen.32.8

32:10 Note: KJB: Gen.32.9

32:11 Note: KJB: Gen.32.10

32:12 Note: KJB: Gen.32.11

32:13 Note: KJB: Gen.32.12

32:14 Note: KJB: Gen.32.13

32:15 Note: KJB: Gen.32.14

32:16 Note: KJB: Gen.32.15

32:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:17 Note: KJB: Gen.32.16

32:18 Note: KJB: Gen.32.17

32:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:19 Note: KJB: Gen.32.18

32:20 Note: KJB: Gen.32.19

32:21 Note: KJB: Gen.32.20

32:22 Note: KJB: Gen.32.21

32:23 Note: KJB: Gen.32.22

32:24 Note: KJB: Gen.32.23

32:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

32:25 Note: KJB: Gen.32.24

32:26 Note: KJB: Gen.32.25

32:27 Note: KJB: Gen.32.26

32:28 Note: KJB: Gen.32.27

32:29 Note: KJB: Gen.32.28

32:30 Note: KJB: Gen.32.29

32:31 Note: KJB: Gen.32.30

32:32 Note: KJB: Gen.32.31

32:33 Note: KJB: Gen.32.32

33:4 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

33:4 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

33:14 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

34:11 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

34:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

35:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

35:10 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

35:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

35:22 OSHB alternative note: וַ/יִּשְׁכַּב֙: (x-accent)וַ/יִּשְׁכַּ֕ב

35:22 OSHB alternative note: בִּלְהָה֙: (x-accent)בִּלְהָ֖ה

35:22 OSHB alternative note: אָבִ֔י/ו: (x-accent)אָבִ֑י/ו

35:22 OSHB alternative note: יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל: (x-accent)יִשְׂרָאֵֽל

36:5 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma_3266 morph_HNp id_01PEh יְע֥וּשׁ

36:13 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

36:14 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma_3266 morph_HNp id_019PN יְע֥וּשׁ

37:12 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.

38:9 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

38:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

38:24 OSHB exegesis note: WLC has this word divided as כְּ/מִשְׁלֹ֣שׁ

38:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

39:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

39:20 OSHB variant note: אסורי: (x-qere) ’אֲסִירֵ֥י’: lemma_615 morph_HNcmpc id_01qVE אֲסִירֵ֥י

40:3 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

40:20 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

41:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

41:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

41:30 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.

41:46 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:7 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:28 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ’: lemma_c/7812 n_0 morph_HC/Vvw3mp id_01UGx וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ

43:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

43:28 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.

45:6 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

47:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

49:8 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.

49:10 OSHB variant note: שילה: (x-qere) ’שִׁיל֔וֹ’: lemma_7886 n_0.1 morph_HNp id_01KU3 שִׁיל֔וֹ

49:11 OSHB variant note: עיר/ה: (x-qere) ’עִיר֔/וֹ’: lemma_5895 n_1.1 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01BN1 עִיר֔/וֹ

49:11 OSHB variant note: סות/ה: (x-qere) ’סוּתֽ/וֹ’: lemma_5497 n_0 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01Chx סוּתֽ/וֹ

49:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.