OET OET-RV OET-LV ULT UST BSB MSB BLB AICNT OEB WEBBE WMBB NET LSV FBV TCNT T4T LEB BBE Moff JPS Wymth ASV DRA YLT Drby RV SLT Wbstr KJB-1769 KJB-1611 Bshps Gnva Cvdl TNT Wycl SR-GNT UHB BrLXX BrTr Related Topics Parallel Interlinear Reference Dictionary Search
OET-LV By Document By Chapter Details
OET-LV GEN EXO LEV NUM DEU JOB JOS JDG RUTH 1 SAM 2 SAM PSA AMOS HOS 1 KI 2 KI 1 CHR 2 CHR PROV ECC SNG JOEL MIC ISA ZEP HAB JER LAM YNA NAH OBA DAN EZE EZRA EST NEH HAG ZEC MAL YHN MARK MAT LUKE ACTs YAC GAL 1 TH 2 TH 1 COR 2 COR ROM COL PHM EPH PHP 1 TIM TIT 1 PET 2 PET 2 TIM HEB YUD 1 YHN 2 YHN 3 YHN REV
This is still an early look into the drafted text of the Open English Translation of the Bible. Please double-check the text in advance before using in public. This view displays the entire ‘book’ so it may be very long to scroll through.
Gen
ESFM v0.6 GEN
WORDTABLE OET-LV_OT_word_table.tsv
The parsed Hebrew text used to create this file is Copyright © 2019 by https://hb.
openscriptures.org
Our English glosses are released CC0 by https://Freely-Given.org
ESFM file created 2026-09-11 22:38 by extract_glossed_OSHB_OT_to_ESFM v1.0.5
ESFM file edited by ScriptedBibleEditor v0.8.2 using ScriptedOTUpdates
Genesis
1:12 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
1:12 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.
2:10 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.
2:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
3:17 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
6:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
7:23 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
8:17 OSHB variant note: הוצא: (x-qere) ’הַיְצֵ֣א’: lemma_3318 morph_HVhv2ms id_01S7t הַיְצֵ֣א
9:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
12:8 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
13:3 OSHB variant note: אהל/ה: (x-qere) ’אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙’: lemma_168 n_0.1.0 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01Gdj אָֽהֳל/וֹ֙
14:2 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ים’: lemma_6636 n_0.1 morph_HNp id_01kJL צְבוֹיִ֔ים
14:2 OSHB note: We read one or more consonants in L differently from BHS.
14:8 OSHB variant note: צביים: (x-qere) ’צְבוֹיִ֔ם’: lemma_6636 n_1.1 morph_HNp id_01Jqs צְבוֹיִ֔ם
14:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
14:17 OSHB note: Marks an anomalous form.
14:17 OSHB note: We read punctuation in L differently from BHS.
15:10 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
16:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.
16:5 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.
17:20 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
18:9 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.
19:2 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.
19:33 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.
22:2 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
22:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
24:33 OSHB variant note: ו/יישם: (x-qere) ’וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם’: lemma_c/7760 a morph_HC/VHw3ms id_01SiU וַ/יּוּשַׂ֤ם
24:36 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
25:23 OSHB variant note: גיים: (x-qere) ’גוֹיִם֙’: lemma_1471 a n_1.2.0 morph_HNcmpa id_01eWf גוֹיִם֙
26:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
26:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
27:3 OSHB variant note: צידה: (x-qere) ’צָֽיִד’: lemma_6720 n_0 morph_HNcbsa id_01ydd צָֽיִד
27:29 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ’: lemma_c/7812 morph_HC/Vvj3mp id_01DTM וְ/יִֽשְׁתַּחֲו֤וּ
27:29 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.
27:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
29:19 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
30:11 OSHB variant note: ב/גד: (x-qere) ’בָּ֣א’: lemma_935 morph_HVqrmsa id_01Q3H בָּ֣א ’גָ֑ד’: lemma_1409 n_1 morph_HNcmsa id_01gKG גָ֑ד
30:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
30:37 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
31:42 OSHB note: We read one or more vowels in L differently from BHS.
31:48 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
31:51 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
32:1 Note: KJB: Gen.31.55
32:2 Note: KJB: Gen.32.1
32:3 Note: KJB: Gen.32.2
32:4 Note: KJB: Gen.32.3
32:5 Note: KJB: Gen.32.4
32:6 Note: KJB: Gen.32.5
32:7 Note: KJB: Gen.32.6
32:8 Note: KJB: Gen.32.7
32:9 Note: KJB: Gen.32.8
32:10 Note: KJB: Gen.32.9
32:11 Note: KJB: Gen.32.10
32:12 Note: KJB: Gen.32.11
32:13 Note: KJB: Gen.32.12
32:14 Note: KJB: Gen.32.13
32:15 Note: KJB: Gen.32.14
32:16 Note: KJB: Gen.32.15
32:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
32:17 Note: KJB: Gen.32.16
32:18 Note: KJB: Gen.32.17
32:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
32:18 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
32:19 Note: KJB: Gen.32.18
32:20 Note: KJB: Gen.32.19
32:21 Note: KJB: Gen.32.20
32:22 Note: KJB: Gen.32.21
32:23 Note: KJB: Gen.32.22
32:24 Note: KJB: Gen.32.23
32:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
32:25 Note: KJB: Gen.32.24
32:26 Note: KJB: Gen.32.25
32:27 Note: KJB: Gen.32.26
32:28 Note: KJB: Gen.32.27
32:29 Note: KJB: Gen.32.28
32:30 Note: KJB: Gen.32.29
32:31 Note: KJB: Gen.32.30
32:32 Note: KJB: Gen.32.31
32:33 Note: KJB: Gen.32.32
33:4 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
33:4 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.
33:14 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
34:11 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
34:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
35:1 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
35:10 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
35:21 OSHB note: We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
35:22 OSHB alternative note: וַ/יִּשְׁכַּב֙: (x-accent)וַ/יִּשְׁכַּ֕ב
35:22 OSHB alternative note: בִּלְהָה֙: (x-accent)בִּלְהָ֖ה
35:22 OSHB alternative note: אָבִ֔י/ו: (x-accent)אָבִ֑י/ו
35:22 OSHB alternative note: יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל: (x-accent)יִשְׂרָאֵֽל
36:5 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma_3266 morph_HNp id_01PEh יְע֥וּשׁ
36:13 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
36:14 OSHB variant note: יעיש: (x-qere) ’יְע֥וּשׁ’: lemma_3266 morph_HNp id_019PN יְע֥וּשׁ
37:12 OSHB note: Puncta extraordinaria a ◌ׄ is used to mark such marks in the text when they are above the line and a ◌ׅ when they are below the line.
38:9 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
38:16 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
38:24 OSHB exegesis note: WLC has this word divided as כְּ/מִשְׁלֹ֣שׁ
38:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
39:19 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
39:20 OSHB variant note: אסורי: (x-qere) ’אֲסִירֵ֥י’: lemma_615 morph_HNcmpc id_01qVE אֲסִירֵ֥י
40:3 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
40:20 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
41:12 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
41:24 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
41:30 OSHB note: We read one or more accents in L differently than BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical error in BHS.
41:46 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
43:7 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
43:28 OSHB variant note: ו/ישתחו: (x-qere) ’וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ’: lemma_c/7812 n_0 morph_HC/Vvw3mp id_01UGx וַ/יִּֽשְׁתַּחֲוּֽוּ
43:28 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
43:28 OSHB note: Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their design, do not indicate.
45:6 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
47:29 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
49:8 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.
49:10 OSHB variant note: שילה: (x-qere) ’שִׁיל֔וֹ’: lemma_7886 n_0.1 morph_HNp id_01KU3 שִׁיל֔וֹ
49:11 OSHB variant note: עיר/ה: (x-qere) ’עִיר֔/וֹ’: lemma_5895 n_1.1 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01BN1 עִיר֔/וֹ
49:11 OSHB variant note: סות/ה: (x-qere) ’סוּתֽ/וֹ’: lemma_5497 n_0 morph_HNcmsc/Sp3ms id_01Chx סוּתֽ/וֹ
49:26 OSHB note: BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where there might be a question of the validity of the form and we keep the same form as BHS.